Cargando…

No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study

INTRODUCTION: Placebo and nocebo effects in pain are well documented. One leading explanation is that instructions indicating that pain will either increase or decrease after receipt of a treatment give rise to expectations for increased or decreased pain. However, the psychological mechanisms throu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coleshill, Matthew James, Sharpe, Louise, Colagiuri, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000921
_version_ 1783690157430407168
author Coleshill, Matthew James
Sharpe, Louise
Colagiuri, Ben
author_facet Coleshill, Matthew James
Sharpe, Louise
Colagiuri, Ben
author_sort Coleshill, Matthew James
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Placebo and nocebo effects in pain are well documented. One leading explanation is that instructions indicating that pain will either increase or decrease after receipt of a treatment give rise to expectations for increased or decreased pain. However, the psychological mechanisms through which expectations affect pain perception are not well understood. One possibility is that the expectation of increased pain leads to anticipatory anxiety, which in turn increases attention towards painful sensations. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that attention mediates nocebo hyperalgesia. This was done by measuring attentional bias towards pain using a dot-probe task both before and after a nocebo manipulation. METHODS: Ninety-six healthy volunteers were randomized to receive one of the following: (1) an inert nasal spray with placebo instructions, (2) an inert nasal spray with nocebo instructions, or (3) no treatment. Participants completed measures of expectations, anxiety, and attention bias (dot-probe paradigm) both before and after randomization. RESULTS: Results showed that the nocebo instructions induced expectations for increased pain and resulted in nocebo hyperalgesia. Conversely, the placebo instruction failed to induce expectations for decreases in pain and did not demonstrate any placebo analgesia. Furthermore, despite the significant expectancies for pain and subsequent nocebo hyperalgesia, there were no differences between the nocebo group and either the placebo or no-treatment group for anxiety or attentional bias. CONCLUSION: The results are consistent with the expectancy model of placebo and nocebo effects. That is, changes in expectations seemed to be necessary to induce a placebo or nocebo effect. However, there was no evidence that anxiety or attention bias towards pain-related stimuli was necessary to achieve nocebo hyperalgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8108596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81085962021-05-11 No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study Coleshill, Matthew James Sharpe, Louise Colagiuri, Ben Pain Rep Psychology INTRODUCTION: Placebo and nocebo effects in pain are well documented. One leading explanation is that instructions indicating that pain will either increase or decrease after receipt of a treatment give rise to expectations for increased or decreased pain. However, the psychological mechanisms through which expectations affect pain perception are not well understood. One possibility is that the expectation of increased pain leads to anticipatory anxiety, which in turn increases attention towards painful sensations. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that attention mediates nocebo hyperalgesia. This was done by measuring attentional bias towards pain using a dot-probe task both before and after a nocebo manipulation. METHODS: Ninety-six healthy volunteers were randomized to receive one of the following: (1) an inert nasal spray with placebo instructions, (2) an inert nasal spray with nocebo instructions, or (3) no treatment. Participants completed measures of expectations, anxiety, and attention bias (dot-probe paradigm) both before and after randomization. RESULTS: Results showed that the nocebo instructions induced expectations for increased pain and resulted in nocebo hyperalgesia. Conversely, the placebo instruction failed to induce expectations for decreases in pain and did not demonstrate any placebo analgesia. Furthermore, despite the significant expectancies for pain and subsequent nocebo hyperalgesia, there were no differences between the nocebo group and either the placebo or no-treatment group for anxiety or attentional bias. CONCLUSION: The results are consistent with the expectancy model of placebo and nocebo effects. That is, changes in expectations seemed to be necessary to induce a placebo or nocebo effect. However, there was no evidence that anxiety or attention bias towards pain-related stimuli was necessary to achieve nocebo hyperalgesia. Wolters Kluwer 2021-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8108596/ /pubmed/33981937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000921 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The International Association for the Study of Pain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Psychology
Coleshill, Matthew James
Sharpe, Louise
Colagiuri, Ben
No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study
title No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study
title_full No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study
title_fullStr No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study
title_full_unstemmed No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study
title_short No evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study
title_sort no evidence that attentional bias towards pain-related words is associated with verbally induced nocebo hyperalgesia: a dot-probe study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8108596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000921
work_keys_str_mv AT coleshillmatthewjames noevidencethatattentionalbiastowardspainrelatedwordsisassociatedwithverballyinducednocebohyperalgesiaadotprobestudy
AT sharpelouise noevidencethatattentionalbiastowardspainrelatedwordsisassociatedwithverballyinducednocebohyperalgesiaadotprobestudy
AT colagiuriben noevidencethatattentionalbiastowardspainrelatedwordsisassociatedwithverballyinducednocebohyperalgesiaadotprobestudy