Cargando…
Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management
BACKGROUND: Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is an unusual anomaly with an unique geographical distribution. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of CPC among anorectal malformation (ARM) cases in our institute and to compare the outcome between conventional three-staged surgery versus tw...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595539 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_53_20 |
_version_ | 1783690225203019776 |
---|---|
author | Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar Jena, Pradeep Kumar Mohanty, Hiranya Kishor |
author_facet | Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar Jena, Pradeep Kumar Mohanty, Hiranya Kishor |
author_sort | Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is an unusual anomaly with an unique geographical distribution. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of CPC among anorectal malformation (ARM) cases in our institute and to compare the outcome between conventional three-staged surgery versus two-staged management approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in the department of pediatric surgery over a period of 7 years from 1(st) April 2013 to 31(st) March 2020. RESULTS: Out of 754 cases of ARMs, 43 cases of CPC were detected. The incidence of pouch colon among patients with high ARMs was found to be 7.6% with a male predominance (M:F = 4.4:1). The anomaly was diagnosed in 72% of our patients preoperatively and Type IV variety was the most common intra-operative finding. The survival after initial hospitalisation was 82% and 88% in three-stage and two-stage surgical procedures, respectively. However, the final clinical outcome after the completion of all stages of surgery and follow-up was better in two-staged approach (54% vs. 47%). CONCLUSION: Although, CPC is a rare anomaly, the incidence in our institute is 7.6% among high ARM cases. As compared to conventional three-staged surgery, the two-staged management approach has the advantage of better survival and decreased morbidity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8109753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81097532021-05-18 Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar Jena, Pradeep Kumar Mohanty, Hiranya Kishor Afr J Paediatr Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is an unusual anomaly with an unique geographical distribution. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of CPC among anorectal malformation (ARM) cases in our institute and to compare the outcome between conventional three-staged surgery versus two-staged management approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in the department of pediatric surgery over a period of 7 years from 1(st) April 2013 to 31(st) March 2020. RESULTS: Out of 754 cases of ARMs, 43 cases of CPC were detected. The incidence of pouch colon among patients with high ARMs was found to be 7.6% with a male predominance (M:F = 4.4:1). The anomaly was diagnosed in 72% of our patients preoperatively and Type IV variety was the most common intra-operative finding. The survival after initial hospitalisation was 82% and 88% in three-stage and two-stage surgical procedures, respectively. However, the final clinical outcome after the completion of all stages of surgery and follow-up was better in two-staged approach (54% vs. 47%). CONCLUSION: Although, CPC is a rare anomaly, the incidence in our institute is 7.6% among high ARM cases. As compared to conventional three-staged surgery, the two-staged management approach has the advantage of better survival and decreased morbidity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8109753/ /pubmed/33595539 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_53_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 African Journal of Paediatric Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar Jena, Pradeep Kumar Mohanty, Hiranya Kishor Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management |
title | Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management |
title_full | Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management |
title_fullStr | Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management |
title_full_unstemmed | Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management |
title_short | Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management |
title_sort | congenital pouch colon: a comparative study between two modalities of management |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595539 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_53_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tripathyprasantakumar congenitalpouchcolonacomparativestudybetweentwomodalitiesofmanagement AT jenapradeepkumar congenitalpouchcolonacomparativestudybetweentwomodalitiesofmanagement AT mohantyhiranyakishor congenitalpouchcolonacomparativestudybetweentwomodalitiesofmanagement |