Cargando…

Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management

BACKGROUND: Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is an unusual anomaly with an unique geographical distribution. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of CPC among anorectal malformation (ARM) cases in our institute and to compare the outcome between conventional three-staged surgery versus tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar, Jena, Pradeep Kumar, Mohanty, Hiranya Kishor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595539
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_53_20
_version_ 1783690225203019776
author Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar
Jena, Pradeep Kumar
Mohanty, Hiranya Kishor
author_facet Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar
Jena, Pradeep Kumar
Mohanty, Hiranya Kishor
author_sort Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is an unusual anomaly with an unique geographical distribution. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of CPC among anorectal malformation (ARM) cases in our institute and to compare the outcome between conventional three-staged surgery versus two-staged management approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in the department of pediatric surgery over a period of 7 years from 1(st) April 2013 to 31(st) March 2020. RESULTS: Out of 754 cases of ARMs, 43 cases of CPC were detected. The incidence of pouch colon among patients with high ARMs was found to be 7.6% with a male predominance (M:F = 4.4:1). The anomaly was diagnosed in 72% of our patients preoperatively and Type IV variety was the most common intra-operative finding. The survival after initial hospitalisation was 82% and 88% in three-stage and two-stage surgical procedures, respectively. However, the final clinical outcome after the completion of all stages of surgery and follow-up was better in two-staged approach (54% vs. 47%). CONCLUSION: Although, CPC is a rare anomaly, the incidence in our institute is 7.6% among high ARM cases. As compared to conventional three-staged surgery, the two-staged management approach has the advantage of better survival and decreased morbidity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8109753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81097532021-05-18 Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar Jena, Pradeep Kumar Mohanty, Hiranya Kishor Afr J Paediatr Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Congenital pouch colon (CPC) is an unusual anomaly with an unique geographical distribution. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of CPC among anorectal malformation (ARM) cases in our institute and to compare the outcome between conventional three-staged surgery versus two-staged management approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in the department of pediatric surgery over a period of 7 years from 1(st) April 2013 to 31(st) March 2020. RESULTS: Out of 754 cases of ARMs, 43 cases of CPC were detected. The incidence of pouch colon among patients with high ARMs was found to be 7.6% with a male predominance (M:F = 4.4:1). The anomaly was diagnosed in 72% of our patients preoperatively and Type IV variety was the most common intra-operative finding. The survival after initial hospitalisation was 82% and 88% in three-stage and two-stage surgical procedures, respectively. However, the final clinical outcome after the completion of all stages of surgery and follow-up was better in two-staged approach (54% vs. 47%). CONCLUSION: Although, CPC is a rare anomaly, the incidence in our institute is 7.6% among high ARM cases. As compared to conventional three-staged surgery, the two-staged management approach has the advantage of better survival and decreased morbidity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8109753/ /pubmed/33595539 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_53_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 African Journal of Paediatric Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tripathy, Prasanta Kumar
Jena, Pradeep Kumar
Mohanty, Hiranya Kishor
Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management
title Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management
title_full Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management
title_fullStr Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management
title_full_unstemmed Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management
title_short Congenital Pouch Colon: A Comparative Study between Two Modalities of Management
title_sort congenital pouch colon: a comparative study between two modalities of management
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33595539
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.AJPS_53_20
work_keys_str_mv AT tripathyprasantakumar congenitalpouchcolonacomparativestudybetweentwomodalitiesofmanagement
AT jenapradeepkumar congenitalpouchcolonacomparativestudybetweentwomodalitiesofmanagement
AT mohantyhiranyakishor congenitalpouchcolonacomparativestudybetweentwomodalitiesofmanagement