Cargando…

The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: Novel devices such as the barrier enclosure were developed in hopes of improving provider safety by limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission during tracheal intubation. Nevertheless, concerns arose regarding a lack of rigorous efficacy and safety data for these devices. We conducted a randomized co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jen, Tim T. H., Gusti, Vionarica, Badh, Charanjit, Mehta, Sachin, Denomme, Justine, Lockhart, Shannon, Shams, Benajir, Klaibert, Beau, Chau, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33973161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z
_version_ 1783690246129451008
author Jen, Tim T. H.
Gusti, Vionarica
Badh, Charanjit
Mehta, Sachin
Denomme, Justine
Lockhart, Shannon
Shams, Benajir
Klaibert, Beau
Chau, Anthony
author_facet Jen, Tim T. H.
Gusti, Vionarica
Badh, Charanjit
Mehta, Sachin
Denomme, Justine
Lockhart, Shannon
Shams, Benajir
Klaibert, Beau
Chau, Anthony
author_sort Jen, Tim T. H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Novel devices such as the barrier enclosure were developed in hopes of improving provider safety by limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission during tracheal intubation. Nevertheless, concerns arose regarding a lack of rigorous efficacy and safety data for these devices. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of the barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation. METHOD: After Research Ethics Board approval, elective surgical patients with normal airway predictors were randomly allocated 1:1 to tracheal intubation with or without a barrier enclosure. The primary outcome was time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success rate, total time of airway manipulation, anesthesiologists’ perception of intubation difficulty, likelihood of use in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, and patients’ perception of comfort and acceptability. RESULTS: There were 48 participants in the barrier enclosure group and 46 participants in the control group. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time to tracheal intubation was 62 (29) sec with barrier closure and 53 (27) sec without barrier enclosure (mean difference, 9 sec; 95% confidence interval, − 3 to 20; P = 0.14). Anesthesiologists rated the difficulty of intubation higher with barrier enclosure (mean [SD] visual analogue scale score, 27 [26] mm vs 9 [17] mm; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In healthy surgical patients with normal airway predictors, the use of a barrier enclosure during tracheal intubation did not significantly prolong time to intubation or decrease first-pass intubation success. Nevertheless, there was an increase in difficulty of intubation perceived by the anesthesiologists with use of a barrier enclosure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04366141); registered 28 April 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8109846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81098462021-05-11 The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial Jen, Tim T. H. Gusti, Vionarica Badh, Charanjit Mehta, Sachin Denomme, Justine Lockhart, Shannon Shams, Benajir Klaibert, Beau Chau, Anthony Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Novel devices such as the barrier enclosure were developed in hopes of improving provider safety by limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission during tracheal intubation. Nevertheless, concerns arose regarding a lack of rigorous efficacy and safety data for these devices. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of the barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation. METHOD: After Research Ethics Board approval, elective surgical patients with normal airway predictors were randomly allocated 1:1 to tracheal intubation with or without a barrier enclosure. The primary outcome was time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success rate, total time of airway manipulation, anesthesiologists’ perception of intubation difficulty, likelihood of use in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, and patients’ perception of comfort and acceptability. RESULTS: There were 48 participants in the barrier enclosure group and 46 participants in the control group. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time to tracheal intubation was 62 (29) sec with barrier closure and 53 (27) sec without barrier enclosure (mean difference, 9 sec; 95% confidence interval, − 3 to 20; P = 0.14). Anesthesiologists rated the difficulty of intubation higher with barrier enclosure (mean [SD] visual analogue scale score, 27 [26] mm vs 9 [17] mm; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In healthy surgical patients with normal airway predictors, the use of a barrier enclosure during tracheal intubation did not significantly prolong time to intubation or decrease first-pass intubation success. Nevertheless, there was an increase in difficulty of intubation perceived by the anesthesiologists with use of a barrier enclosure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04366141); registered 28 April 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8109846/ /pubmed/33973161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z Text en © Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Reports of Original Investigations
Jen, Tim T. H.
Gusti, Vionarica
Badh, Charanjit
Mehta, Sachin
Denomme, Justine
Lockhart, Shannon
Shams, Benajir
Klaibert, Beau
Chau, Anthony
The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial
title The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial
topic Reports of Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33973161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jentimth theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gustivionarica theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT badhcharanjit theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mehtasachin theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT denommejustine theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lockhartshannon theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shamsbenajir theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT klaibertbeau theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chauanthony theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jentimth impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gustivionarica impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT badhcharanjit impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mehtasachin impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT denommejustine impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lockhartshannon impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shamsbenajir impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT klaibertbeau impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chauanthony impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial