Cargando…
The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial
PURPOSE: Novel devices such as the barrier enclosure were developed in hopes of improving provider safety by limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission during tracheal intubation. Nevertheless, concerns arose regarding a lack of rigorous efficacy and safety data for these devices. We conducted a randomized co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33973161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z |
_version_ | 1783690246129451008 |
---|---|
author | Jen, Tim T. H. Gusti, Vionarica Badh, Charanjit Mehta, Sachin Denomme, Justine Lockhart, Shannon Shams, Benajir Klaibert, Beau Chau, Anthony |
author_facet | Jen, Tim T. H. Gusti, Vionarica Badh, Charanjit Mehta, Sachin Denomme, Justine Lockhart, Shannon Shams, Benajir Klaibert, Beau Chau, Anthony |
author_sort | Jen, Tim T. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Novel devices such as the barrier enclosure were developed in hopes of improving provider safety by limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission during tracheal intubation. Nevertheless, concerns arose regarding a lack of rigorous efficacy and safety data for these devices. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of the barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation. METHOD: After Research Ethics Board approval, elective surgical patients with normal airway predictors were randomly allocated 1:1 to tracheal intubation with or without a barrier enclosure. The primary outcome was time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success rate, total time of airway manipulation, anesthesiologists’ perception of intubation difficulty, likelihood of use in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, and patients’ perception of comfort and acceptability. RESULTS: There were 48 participants in the barrier enclosure group and 46 participants in the control group. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time to tracheal intubation was 62 (29) sec with barrier closure and 53 (27) sec without barrier enclosure (mean difference, 9 sec; 95% confidence interval, − 3 to 20; P = 0.14). Anesthesiologists rated the difficulty of intubation higher with barrier enclosure (mean [SD] visual analogue scale score, 27 [26] mm vs 9 [17] mm; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In healthy surgical patients with normal airway predictors, the use of a barrier enclosure during tracheal intubation did not significantly prolong time to intubation or decrease first-pass intubation success. Nevertheless, there was an increase in difficulty of intubation perceived by the anesthesiologists with use of a barrier enclosure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04366141); registered 28 April 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8109846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81098462021-05-11 The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial Jen, Tim T. H. Gusti, Vionarica Badh, Charanjit Mehta, Sachin Denomme, Justine Lockhart, Shannon Shams, Benajir Klaibert, Beau Chau, Anthony Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Novel devices such as the barrier enclosure were developed in hopes of improving provider safety by limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission during tracheal intubation. Nevertheless, concerns arose regarding a lack of rigorous efficacy and safety data for these devices. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of the barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation. METHOD: After Research Ethics Board approval, elective surgical patients with normal airway predictors were randomly allocated 1:1 to tracheal intubation with or without a barrier enclosure. The primary outcome was time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included first-pass success rate, total time of airway manipulation, anesthesiologists’ perception of intubation difficulty, likelihood of use in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, and patients’ perception of comfort and acceptability. RESULTS: There were 48 participants in the barrier enclosure group and 46 participants in the control group. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) time to tracheal intubation was 62 (29) sec with barrier closure and 53 (27) sec without barrier enclosure (mean difference, 9 sec; 95% confidence interval, − 3 to 20; P = 0.14). Anesthesiologists rated the difficulty of intubation higher with barrier enclosure (mean [SD] visual analogue scale score, 27 [26] mm vs 9 [17] mm; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In healthy surgical patients with normal airway predictors, the use of a barrier enclosure during tracheal intubation did not significantly prolong time to intubation or decrease first-pass intubation success. Nevertheless, there was an increase in difficulty of intubation perceived by the anesthesiologists with use of a barrier enclosure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04366141); registered 28 April 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8109846/ /pubmed/33973161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z Text en © Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Reports of Original Investigations Jen, Tim T. H. Gusti, Vionarica Badh, Charanjit Mehta, Sachin Denomme, Justine Lockhart, Shannon Shams, Benajir Klaibert, Beau Chau, Anthony The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial |
title | The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | impact of a barrier enclosure on time to tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Reports of Original Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8109846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33973161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02024-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jentimth theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gustivionarica theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT badhcharanjit theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mehtasachin theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT denommejustine theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lockhartshannon theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shamsbenajir theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT klaibertbeau theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chauanthony theimpactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jentimth impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gustivionarica impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT badhcharanjit impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mehtasachin impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT denommejustine impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lockhartshannon impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shamsbenajir impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT klaibertbeau impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chauanthony impactofabarrierenclosureontimetotrachealintubationarandomizedcontrolledtrial |