Cargando…

Surface Analysis and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Frequently Exposed to a Desensitizing Agent

BACKGROUND: Patients with tooth sensitivity are frequently exposed to desensitizing agents on a regular basis. These agents might have an impact on the surface properties and color of existing oral restorations. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the color stability, surface microhardness,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aref, Neven S., Abdallah, Reham M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8110422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9989747
_version_ 1783690300260089856
author Aref, Neven S.
Abdallah, Reham M.
author_facet Aref, Neven S.
Abdallah, Reham M.
author_sort Aref, Neven S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with tooth sensitivity are frequently exposed to desensitizing agents on a regular basis. These agents might have an impact on the surface properties and color of existing oral restorations. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the color stability, surface microhardness, and surface roughness of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC), amalgomer CR, nanohybrid, and bulk-fill resin composites restorative materials after frequent exposure to a desensitizing agent. Materials and Methods. One hundred and twenty specimens were prepared; 10 specimens for each restorative material were equally subdivided into control and desensitizing-agent-exposed groups in each test. Surface microhardness and surface roughness were evaluated using the Vickers microhardness tester and surface profilometer, respectively. The color change was measured by using a spectrophotometer using the CIE L(∗)a(∗)b(∗) formula. Surface topography was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The collected data were analyzed with Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey post hoc tests for pairwise comparison at a level of significance of 0.05. RESULT: The frequent use of a desensitizing agent significantly decreased surface hardness of RMGIC, amalgomer, and bulk-fill composite materials. However, nanohybrid composite exhibited a significant surface hardness increase. The surface roughness of RMGIC, amalgomer, and nanohybrid composite increased significantly. Meanwhile, the bulk-fill resin composite showed a nonsignificant decrease. Both RMGIC and amalgomer exhibited significantly higher values of color change in comparison to those of nanohybrid and bulk-fill composites. CONCLUSION: The bulk-fill composite seems to be more resistant to discoloration and surface topographical changes than other tested materials on frequent exposure to the desensitizing agent. However, this exposure may pose a negative impact on its surface hardness. Bulk-fill resin composite may be the most suitable esthetic restorative in patients who frequently use desensitizing agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8110422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81104222021-05-17 Surface Analysis and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Frequently Exposed to a Desensitizing Agent Aref, Neven S. Abdallah, Reham M. Int J Biomater Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with tooth sensitivity are frequently exposed to desensitizing agents on a regular basis. These agents might have an impact on the surface properties and color of existing oral restorations. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the color stability, surface microhardness, and surface roughness of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC), amalgomer CR, nanohybrid, and bulk-fill resin composites restorative materials after frequent exposure to a desensitizing agent. Materials and Methods. One hundred and twenty specimens were prepared; 10 specimens for each restorative material were equally subdivided into control and desensitizing-agent-exposed groups in each test. Surface microhardness and surface roughness were evaluated using the Vickers microhardness tester and surface profilometer, respectively. The color change was measured by using a spectrophotometer using the CIE L(∗)a(∗)b(∗) formula. Surface topography was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The collected data were analyzed with Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey post hoc tests for pairwise comparison at a level of significance of 0.05. RESULT: The frequent use of a desensitizing agent significantly decreased surface hardness of RMGIC, amalgomer, and bulk-fill composite materials. However, nanohybrid composite exhibited a significant surface hardness increase. The surface roughness of RMGIC, amalgomer, and nanohybrid composite increased significantly. Meanwhile, the bulk-fill resin composite showed a nonsignificant decrease. Both RMGIC and amalgomer exhibited significantly higher values of color change in comparison to those of nanohybrid and bulk-fill composites. CONCLUSION: The bulk-fill composite seems to be more resistant to discoloration and surface topographical changes than other tested materials on frequent exposure to the desensitizing agent. However, this exposure may pose a negative impact on its surface hardness. Bulk-fill resin composite may be the most suitable esthetic restorative in patients who frequently use desensitizing agents. Hindawi 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8110422/ /pubmed/34007281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9989747 Text en Copyright © 2021 Neven S. Aref and Reham M. Abdallah. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aref, Neven S.
Abdallah, Reham M.
Surface Analysis and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Frequently Exposed to a Desensitizing Agent
title Surface Analysis and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Frequently Exposed to a Desensitizing Agent
title_full Surface Analysis and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Frequently Exposed to a Desensitizing Agent
title_fullStr Surface Analysis and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Frequently Exposed to a Desensitizing Agent
title_full_unstemmed Surface Analysis and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Frequently Exposed to a Desensitizing Agent
title_short Surface Analysis and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Frequently Exposed to a Desensitizing Agent
title_sort surface analysis and spectrophotometric evaluation of different esthetic restorative materials frequently exposed to a desensitizing agent
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8110422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9989747
work_keys_str_mv AT arefnevens surfaceanalysisandspectrophotometricevaluationofdifferentestheticrestorativematerialsfrequentlyexposedtoadesensitizingagent
AT abdallahrehamm surfaceanalysisandspectrophotometricevaluationofdifferentestheticrestorativematerialsfrequentlyexposedtoadesensitizingagent