Cargando…

Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Aberrant DNA methylation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene has been found in many cancers. The object of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of PTEN methylation as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. The study includes 153 newly diagnosed females, and they were d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramadan, Amal, Hashim, Maha, Abouzid, Amr, Swellam, Menha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8110663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00169-4
_version_ 1783690337779187712
author Ramadan, Amal
Hashim, Maha
Abouzid, Amr
Swellam, Menha
author_facet Ramadan, Amal
Hashim, Maha
Abouzid, Amr
Swellam, Menha
author_sort Ramadan, Amal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aberrant DNA methylation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene has been found in many cancers. The object of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of PTEN methylation as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. The study includes 153 newly diagnosed females, and they were divided according to their clinical diagnosis into breast cancer patients (n = 112) and females with benign breast lesion (n = 41). A group of healthy individuals (n = 25) were recruited as control individuals. Breast cancer patients were categorized into early stage (0–I, n = 48) and late stage (II–III, n = 64), and graded into low grade (I–II, n = 42) and high grade (III, n = 70). Their pathological types were invasive duct carcinoma (IDC) (n = 66) and duct carcinoma in situ (DCI) (n = 46). Tumor markers (CEA and CA15.3) were detected using ELISA. DNA was taken away from the blood, and the PTEN promoter methylation level was evaluated using the EpiTect Methyl II PCR method. RESULTS: The findings revealed the superiority of PTEN methylation status as a good discriminator of the cancer group from the other two groups (benign and control) with its highest AUC and increased sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (100%) over tumor markers (50% and 84% for CEA and 49.1% and 86.4% for CA15.3), respectively. The frequency of PTEN methylation was 96.4% of breast cancer patients and none of the benign and controls showed PTEN methylation and the means of PTEN methylation (87 ± 0.6) were significantly increased in blood samples of breast cancer group as compared to both benign and control groups (25 ± 0.7 and 12.6 ± 0.3), respectively. Methylation levels of PTEN were higher in the blood of patients with ER-positive than in patients with ER-negative cancers (P = 0.007) and in HER2 positive vs. HER2 negative tumors (P = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis recognizes PTEN methylation status as a significant forecaster of bad progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after 40 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PETN methylation could be supposed as one of the epigenetic aspects influencing the breast cancer prognosis that might foretell more aggressive actions and worse results in breast cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8110663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81106632021-05-25 Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer Ramadan, Amal Hashim, Maha Abouzid, Amr Swellam, Menha J Genet Eng Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: Aberrant DNA methylation of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene has been found in many cancers. The object of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of PTEN methylation as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. The study includes 153 newly diagnosed females, and they were divided according to their clinical diagnosis into breast cancer patients (n = 112) and females with benign breast lesion (n = 41). A group of healthy individuals (n = 25) were recruited as control individuals. Breast cancer patients were categorized into early stage (0–I, n = 48) and late stage (II–III, n = 64), and graded into low grade (I–II, n = 42) and high grade (III, n = 70). Their pathological types were invasive duct carcinoma (IDC) (n = 66) and duct carcinoma in situ (DCI) (n = 46). Tumor markers (CEA and CA15.3) were detected using ELISA. DNA was taken away from the blood, and the PTEN promoter methylation level was evaluated using the EpiTect Methyl II PCR method. RESULTS: The findings revealed the superiority of PTEN methylation status as a good discriminator of the cancer group from the other two groups (benign and control) with its highest AUC and increased sensitivity (96.4%) and specificity (100%) over tumor markers (50% and 84% for CEA and 49.1% and 86.4% for CA15.3), respectively. The frequency of PTEN methylation was 96.4% of breast cancer patients and none of the benign and controls showed PTEN methylation and the means of PTEN methylation (87 ± 0.6) were significantly increased in blood samples of breast cancer group as compared to both benign and control groups (25 ± 0.7 and 12.6 ± 0.3), respectively. Methylation levels of PTEN were higher in the blood of patients with ER-positive than in patients with ER-negative cancers (P = 0.007) and in HER2 positive vs. HER2 negative tumors (P = 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis recognizes PTEN methylation status as a significant forecaster of bad progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after 40 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PETN methylation could be supposed as one of the epigenetic aspects influencing the breast cancer prognosis that might foretell more aggressive actions and worse results in breast cancer patients. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8110663/ /pubmed/33970384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00169-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Ramadan, Amal
Hashim, Maha
Abouzid, Amr
Swellam, Menha
Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer
title Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_full Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_fullStr Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_short Clinical impact of PTEN methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer
title_sort clinical impact of pten methylation status as a prognostic marker for breast cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8110663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00169-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ramadanamal clinicalimpactofptenmethylationstatusasaprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer
AT hashimmaha clinicalimpactofptenmethylationstatusasaprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer
AT abouzidamr clinicalimpactofptenmethylationstatusasaprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer
AT swellammenha clinicalimpactofptenmethylationstatusasaprognosticmarkerforbreastcancer