Cargando…
Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms
Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is especially suitable for colorectal surgery. Until now, most of the reports published were about laparoscopic NOSES, the reports about robotic NOSES are extremely rare. This study aims to explore the safety and feasibility of robotic NOSES for co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8110763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33972632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89323-z |
_version_ | 1783690357934915584 |
---|---|
author | Yao, Hongliang Li, Tiegang Chen, Weidong Lei, Sanlin Liu, Kuijie Liu, Bo Zhou, Jiangjiao |
author_facet | Yao, Hongliang Li, Tiegang Chen, Weidong Lei, Sanlin Liu, Kuijie Liu, Bo Zhou, Jiangjiao |
author_sort | Yao, Hongliang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is especially suitable for colorectal surgery. Until now, most of the reports published were about laparoscopic NOSES, the reports about robotic NOSES are extremely rare. This study aims to explore the safety and feasibility of robotic NOSES for colorectal neoplasms. All patients underwent robotic NOSES from March 2016 to October 2019 in our hospital were enrolled for retrospective analysis. Clinicopathological data including patient characteristics, perioperative information and pathological information were collected and analyzed. According to the distance between tumor and anus or whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nRCT) is performed, we grouped the cases and studied its influence on robotic NOSES. Also, we compared the previous reports on laparoscopic NOSES with our study and revealed advantages of robotic NOSES in terms of safety and feasibility. A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The average distance from the lower edge of the tumor to the anus was (8.64 ± 3.64) cm and maximum circumferential diameter (CDmax) of specimen was (3.5 ± 1.6) cm. In terms of safety, the average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were (187.5 ± 78.3) min, (47.4 ± 34) mL, and (11.3 ± 7.5) days, respectively. In terms of feasibility, the average number of lymph node harvested was (14.8 ± 5). Robotic NOSES shows advantages in terms of safety and feasibility compared with laparoscopic NOSES. This procedure could not only be a safe procedure but also could achieve good oncological outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8110763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81107632021-05-12 Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms Yao, Hongliang Li, Tiegang Chen, Weidong Lei, Sanlin Liu, Kuijie Liu, Bo Zhou, Jiangjiao Sci Rep Article Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is especially suitable for colorectal surgery. Until now, most of the reports published were about laparoscopic NOSES, the reports about robotic NOSES are extremely rare. This study aims to explore the safety and feasibility of robotic NOSES for colorectal neoplasms. All patients underwent robotic NOSES from March 2016 to October 2019 in our hospital were enrolled for retrospective analysis. Clinicopathological data including patient characteristics, perioperative information and pathological information were collected and analyzed. According to the distance between tumor and anus or whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nRCT) is performed, we grouped the cases and studied its influence on robotic NOSES. Also, we compared the previous reports on laparoscopic NOSES with our study and revealed advantages of robotic NOSES in terms of safety and feasibility. A total of 180 patients were enrolled. The average distance from the lower edge of the tumor to the anus was (8.64 ± 3.64) cm and maximum circumferential diameter (CDmax) of specimen was (3.5 ± 1.6) cm. In terms of safety, the average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay were (187.5 ± 78.3) min, (47.4 ± 34) mL, and (11.3 ± 7.5) days, respectively. In terms of feasibility, the average number of lymph node harvested was (14.8 ± 5). Robotic NOSES shows advantages in terms of safety and feasibility compared with laparoscopic NOSES. This procedure could not only be a safe procedure but also could achieve good oncological outcomes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8110763/ /pubmed/33972632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89323-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Yao, Hongliang Li, Tiegang Chen, Weidong Lei, Sanlin Liu, Kuijie Liu, Bo Zhou, Jiangjiao Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms |
title | Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms |
title_full | Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms |
title_fullStr | Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms |
title_short | Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms |
title_sort | role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8110763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33972632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89323-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaohongliang roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms AT litiegang roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms AT chenweidong roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms AT leisanlin roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms AT liukuijie roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms AT liubo roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms AT zhoujiangjiao roleofroboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryincolorectalneoplasms |