Cargando…
Refuting the myth of a ‘tsunami’ of mental ill-health in populations affected by COVID-19: evidence that response to the pandemic is heterogeneous, not homogeneous
BACKGROUND: The current study argues that population prevalence estimates for mental health disorders, or changes in mean scores over time, may not adequately reflect the heterogeneity in mental health response to the COVID-19 pandemic within the population. METHODS: The COVID-19 Psychological Resea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001665 |
_version_ | 1783690450942558208 |
---|---|
author | Shevlin, Mark Butter, Sarah McBride, Orla Murphy, Jamie Gibson-Miller, Jilly Hartman, Todd K. Levita, Liat Mason, Liam Martinez, Anton P. McKay, Ryan Stocks, Thomas V. A. Bennett, Kate Hyland, Philip Bentall, Richard P. |
author_facet | Shevlin, Mark Butter, Sarah McBride, Orla Murphy, Jamie Gibson-Miller, Jilly Hartman, Todd K. Levita, Liat Mason, Liam Martinez, Anton P. McKay, Ryan Stocks, Thomas V. A. Bennett, Kate Hyland, Philip Bentall, Richard P. |
author_sort | Shevlin, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The current study argues that population prevalence estimates for mental health disorders, or changes in mean scores over time, may not adequately reflect the heterogeneity in mental health response to the COVID-19 pandemic within the population. METHODS: The COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study is a longitudinal, nationally representative, online survey of UK adults. The current study analysed data from its first three waves of data collection: Wave 1 (March 2020, N = 2025), Wave 2 (April 2020, N = 1406) and Wave 3 (July 2020, N = 1166). Anxiety-depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (a composite measure of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7) and COVID-19-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the International Trauma Questionnaire. Changes in mental health outcomes were modelled across the three waves. Latent class growth analysis was used to identify subgroups of individuals with different trajectories of change in anxiety-depression and COVID-19 PTSD. Latent class membership was regressed on baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of anxiety-depression remained stable, while COVID-19 PTSD reduced between Waves 2 and 3. Heterogeneity in mental health response was found, and hypothesised classes reflecting (i) stability, (ii) improvement and (iii) deterioration in mental health were identified. Psychological factors were most likely to differentiate the improving, deteriorating and high-stable classes from the low-stable mental health trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: A low-stable profile characterised by little-to-no psychological distress (‘resilient’ class) was the most common trajectory for both anxiety-depression and COVID-19 PTSD. Monitoring these trajectories is necessary moving forward, in particular for the ~30% of individuals with increasing anxiety-depression levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8111207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81112072021-05-11 Refuting the myth of a ‘tsunami’ of mental ill-health in populations affected by COVID-19: evidence that response to the pandemic is heterogeneous, not homogeneous Shevlin, Mark Butter, Sarah McBride, Orla Murphy, Jamie Gibson-Miller, Jilly Hartman, Todd K. Levita, Liat Mason, Liam Martinez, Anton P. McKay, Ryan Stocks, Thomas V. A. Bennett, Kate Hyland, Philip Bentall, Richard P. Psychol Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The current study argues that population prevalence estimates for mental health disorders, or changes in mean scores over time, may not adequately reflect the heterogeneity in mental health response to the COVID-19 pandemic within the population. METHODS: The COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study is a longitudinal, nationally representative, online survey of UK adults. The current study analysed data from its first three waves of data collection: Wave 1 (March 2020, N = 2025), Wave 2 (April 2020, N = 1406) and Wave 3 (July 2020, N = 1166). Anxiety-depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (a composite measure of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7) and COVID-19-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with the International Trauma Questionnaire. Changes in mental health outcomes were modelled across the three waves. Latent class growth analysis was used to identify subgroups of individuals with different trajectories of change in anxiety-depression and COVID-19 PTSD. Latent class membership was regressed on baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of anxiety-depression remained stable, while COVID-19 PTSD reduced between Waves 2 and 3. Heterogeneity in mental health response was found, and hypothesised classes reflecting (i) stability, (ii) improvement and (iii) deterioration in mental health were identified. Psychological factors were most likely to differentiate the improving, deteriorating and high-stable classes from the low-stable mental health trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: A low-stable profile characterised by little-to-no psychological distress (‘resilient’ class) was the most common trajectory for both anxiety-depression and COVID-19 PTSD. Monitoring these trajectories is necessary moving forward, in particular for the ~30% of individuals with increasing anxiety-depression levels. Cambridge University Press 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8111207/ /pubmed/33875044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001665 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re- use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shevlin, Mark Butter, Sarah McBride, Orla Murphy, Jamie Gibson-Miller, Jilly Hartman, Todd K. Levita, Liat Mason, Liam Martinez, Anton P. McKay, Ryan Stocks, Thomas V. A. Bennett, Kate Hyland, Philip Bentall, Richard P. Refuting the myth of a ‘tsunami’ of mental ill-health in populations affected by COVID-19: evidence that response to the pandemic is heterogeneous, not homogeneous |
title | Refuting the myth of a ‘tsunami’ of mental ill-health in populations affected by COVID-19: evidence that response to the pandemic is heterogeneous, not homogeneous |
title_full | Refuting the myth of a ‘tsunami’ of mental ill-health in populations affected by COVID-19: evidence that response to the pandemic is heterogeneous, not homogeneous |
title_fullStr | Refuting the myth of a ‘tsunami’ of mental ill-health in populations affected by COVID-19: evidence that response to the pandemic is heterogeneous, not homogeneous |
title_full_unstemmed | Refuting the myth of a ‘tsunami’ of mental ill-health in populations affected by COVID-19: evidence that response to the pandemic is heterogeneous, not homogeneous |
title_short | Refuting the myth of a ‘tsunami’ of mental ill-health in populations affected by COVID-19: evidence that response to the pandemic is heterogeneous, not homogeneous |
title_sort | refuting the myth of a ‘tsunami’ of mental ill-health in populations affected by covid-19: evidence that response to the pandemic is heterogeneous, not homogeneous |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001665 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shevlinmark refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT buttersarah refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT mcbrideorla refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT murphyjamie refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT gibsonmillerjilly refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT hartmantoddk refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT levitaliat refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT masonliam refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT martinezantonp refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT mckayryan refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT stocksthomasva refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT bennettkate refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT hylandphilip refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous AT bentallrichardp refutingthemythofatsunamiofmentalillhealthinpopulationsaffectedbycovid19evidencethatresponsetothepandemicisheterogeneousnothomogeneous |