Cargando…

Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage

BACKGROUND: Although Bankart repair with remplissage is commonly performed to treat anterior shoulder instability, there is limited information on specific outcomes or patients’ fears regarding return to sports (RTS). PURPOSE: To study recurrence rates, pain, shoulder function, active range of motio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Sijia, Chen, Mo, Chen, Jun, Li, Hong, Chen, Jiwu, Chen, Shiyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211001775
_version_ 1783690464160907264
author Feng, Sijia
Chen, Mo
Chen, Jun
Li, Hong
Chen, Jiwu
Chen, Shiyi
author_facet Feng, Sijia
Chen, Mo
Chen, Jun
Li, Hong
Chen, Jiwu
Chen, Shiyi
author_sort Feng, Sijia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although Bankart repair with remplissage is commonly performed to treat anterior shoulder instability, there is limited information on specific outcomes or patients’ fears regarding return to sports (RTS). PURPOSE: To study recurrence rates, pain, shoulder function, active range of motion (ROM), RTS rate, and patients’ fears and expectations for RTS after arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage for anterior shoulder instability. We compared these outcomes with those after Bankart repair alone. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out between 2007 and 2017 among patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (group BR) and Bankart repair alone (group B). At the final follow-up, outcomes including recurrence, pain, shoulder function, active ROM, RTS rate, and fear toward RTS were assessed. The specific outcomes for RTS were evaluated based on 3 levels: return to normal life, RTS at any level (RTSA), and RTS at previous level (RTSP). RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included (29 in group BR and 41 in group B) with a mean 67.2 months of follow-up. Group BR demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate than did group B (0 vs 22.0%, respectively; P = .007) as well as higher postoperative Rowe score (92.8 ± 7.1 vs 83.3 ± 16.2, respectively; P = .005). There were no differences between the groups in postoperative visual analog scale for pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, or active ROM. The rates of RTSA (100% vs 84.2%; P = .03) and RTSP (77.8% vs 50.0%; P = .02) were higher in group BR than in group B, respectively, and significantly fewer patients in group BR reported fear of RTS (40.7% vs 63.2%; P = .04). CONCLUSION: In this study, recurrence rate, pain, shoulder function, active ROM, and RTS rate were satisfactory after arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage. Patients who underwent this procedure reported less fear toward RTS and higher rates of RTSA and RTSP than did those who undergo Bankart repair alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8111275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81112752021-05-14 Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage Feng, Sijia Chen, Mo Chen, Jun Li, Hong Chen, Jiwu Chen, Shiyi Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Although Bankart repair with remplissage is commonly performed to treat anterior shoulder instability, there is limited information on specific outcomes or patients’ fears regarding return to sports (RTS). PURPOSE: To study recurrence rates, pain, shoulder function, active range of motion (ROM), RTS rate, and patients’ fears and expectations for RTS after arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage for anterior shoulder instability. We compared these outcomes with those after Bankart repair alone. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out between 2007 and 2017 among patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (group BR) and Bankart repair alone (group B). At the final follow-up, outcomes including recurrence, pain, shoulder function, active ROM, RTS rate, and fear toward RTS were assessed. The specific outcomes for RTS were evaluated based on 3 levels: return to normal life, RTS at any level (RTSA), and RTS at previous level (RTSP). RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included (29 in group BR and 41 in group B) with a mean 67.2 months of follow-up. Group BR demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate than did group B (0 vs 22.0%, respectively; P = .007) as well as higher postoperative Rowe score (92.8 ± 7.1 vs 83.3 ± 16.2, respectively; P = .005). There were no differences between the groups in postoperative visual analog scale for pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, or active ROM. The rates of RTSA (100% vs 84.2%; P = .03) and RTSP (77.8% vs 50.0%; P = .02) were higher in group BR than in group B, respectively, and significantly fewer patients in group BR reported fear of RTS (40.7% vs 63.2%; P = .04). CONCLUSION: In this study, recurrence rate, pain, shoulder function, active ROM, and RTS rate were satisfactory after arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage. Patients who underwent this procedure reported less fear toward RTS and higher rates of RTSA and RTSP than did those who undergo Bankart repair alone. SAGE Publications 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8111275/ /pubmed/33997069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211001775 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Feng, Sijia
Chen, Mo
Chen, Jun
Li, Hong
Chen, Jiwu
Chen, Shiyi
Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage
title Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage
title_full Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage
title_fullStr Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage
title_full_unstemmed Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage
title_short Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage
title_sort patient outcomes and fear of returning to sports after arthroscopic bankart repair with remplissage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211001775
work_keys_str_mv AT fengsijia patientoutcomesandfearofreturningtosportsafterarthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissage
AT chenmo patientoutcomesandfearofreturningtosportsafterarthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissage
AT chenjun patientoutcomesandfearofreturningtosportsafterarthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissage
AT lihong patientoutcomesandfearofreturningtosportsafterarthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissage
AT chenjiwu patientoutcomesandfearofreturningtosportsafterarthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissage
AT chenshiyi patientoutcomesandfearofreturningtosportsafterarthroscopicbankartrepairwithremplissage