Cargando…

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Treatment of Opioid Dependence With Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Depot vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcomes in the treatment of opioid dependence may differ between subcutaneously administered depot buprenorphine and daily sublingual buprenorphine. OBJECTIVE: To compare patient satisfaction between depot buprenorphine and sublingual buprenorphine in adult outpatients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lintzeris, Nicholas, Dunlop, Adrian J., Haber, Paul S., Lubman, Dan I., Graham, Robert, Hutchinson, Sarah, Arunogiri, Shalini, Hayes, Victoria, Hjelmström, Peter, Svedberg, Agneta, Peterson, Stefan, Tiberg, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9041
_version_ 1783690510691467264
author Lintzeris, Nicholas
Dunlop, Adrian J.
Haber, Paul S.
Lubman, Dan I.
Graham, Robert
Hutchinson, Sarah
Arunogiri, Shalini
Hayes, Victoria
Hjelmström, Peter
Svedberg, Agneta
Peterson, Stefan
Tiberg, Fredrik
author_facet Lintzeris, Nicholas
Dunlop, Adrian J.
Haber, Paul S.
Lubman, Dan I.
Graham, Robert
Hutchinson, Sarah
Arunogiri, Shalini
Hayes, Victoria
Hjelmström, Peter
Svedberg, Agneta
Peterson, Stefan
Tiberg, Fredrik
author_sort Lintzeris, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcomes in the treatment of opioid dependence may differ between subcutaneously administered depot buprenorphine and daily sublingual buprenorphine. OBJECTIVE: To compare patient satisfaction between depot buprenorphine and sublingual buprenorphine in adult outpatients with opioid dependence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted among adult patients with opioid dependence at 6 outpatient clinical sites in Australia from October 2018 to September 2019. Data analysis was conducted from October 2019 to May 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive treatment with weekly or monthly depot buprenorphine or daily sublingual buprenorphine over 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the difference in global treatment satisfaction, assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) version 1.4 (range, 0-100; higher score indicates greater satisfaction) at week 24. Secondary end points included other patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life, treatment burden, and health-related outcomes, as well as measures of opioid use, retention in treatment, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 119 participants (70 [58.8%] men; mean [SD] age, 44.4 [10.5] years) were enrolled, randomized to, and received either depot buprenorphine (60 participants [50.4%]) or sublingual buprenorphine (59 participants [49.6%]). From the initial sample of 120, a participant (0.8%) in the sublingual buprenorphine group withdrew consent and did not receive study treatment. All participants were receiving sublingual buprenorphine when enrolled. The mean TSQM global satisfaction score was significantly higher for the depot group compared with the sublingual group at week 24 (mean [SE] score, 82.5 [2.3] vs 74.3 [2.3]; difference, 8.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 14.6; P = .01). Improved outcomes were also observed for several secondary end points after treatment with depot buprenorphine (eg, mean [SE] treatment burden assessed by the Treatment Burden Questionnaire global score, on which lower scores indicate lower burden: 13.2 [2.6] vs 28.6 [2.5]; difference, −15.4; 95% CI, −22.6 to −8.2; P < .001). Thirty-nine participants (65.0%) in the depot buprenorphine group experienced 117 adverse drug reactions, mainly injection site reactions of mild intensity following subcutaneous administration, and 12 participants (20.3%) in the sublingual buprenorphine group experienced 21 adverse drug reactions. No participants withdrew from the trial medication or the trial due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, participants receiving depot buprenorphine reported improved treatment satisfaction compared with those receiving sublingual buprenorphine. The results highlight the application of patient-reported outcomes as alternative end points to traditional markers of substance use in addiction treatment outcome studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ANZCTR12618001759280
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8111483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81114832021-05-12 Patient-Reported Outcomes of Treatment of Opioid Dependence With Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Depot vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial Lintzeris, Nicholas Dunlop, Adrian J. Haber, Paul S. Lubman, Dan I. Graham, Robert Hutchinson, Sarah Arunogiri, Shalini Hayes, Victoria Hjelmström, Peter Svedberg, Agneta Peterson, Stefan Tiberg, Fredrik JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcomes in the treatment of opioid dependence may differ between subcutaneously administered depot buprenorphine and daily sublingual buprenorphine. OBJECTIVE: To compare patient satisfaction between depot buprenorphine and sublingual buprenorphine in adult outpatients with opioid dependence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted among adult patients with opioid dependence at 6 outpatient clinical sites in Australia from October 2018 to September 2019. Data analysis was conducted from October 2019 to May 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive treatment with weekly or monthly depot buprenorphine or daily sublingual buprenorphine over 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the difference in global treatment satisfaction, assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) version 1.4 (range, 0-100; higher score indicates greater satisfaction) at week 24. Secondary end points included other patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life, treatment burden, and health-related outcomes, as well as measures of opioid use, retention in treatment, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 119 participants (70 [58.8%] men; mean [SD] age, 44.4 [10.5] years) were enrolled, randomized to, and received either depot buprenorphine (60 participants [50.4%]) or sublingual buprenorphine (59 participants [49.6%]). From the initial sample of 120, a participant (0.8%) in the sublingual buprenorphine group withdrew consent and did not receive study treatment. All participants were receiving sublingual buprenorphine when enrolled. The mean TSQM global satisfaction score was significantly higher for the depot group compared with the sublingual group at week 24 (mean [SE] score, 82.5 [2.3] vs 74.3 [2.3]; difference, 8.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 14.6; P = .01). Improved outcomes were also observed for several secondary end points after treatment with depot buprenorphine (eg, mean [SE] treatment burden assessed by the Treatment Burden Questionnaire global score, on which lower scores indicate lower burden: 13.2 [2.6] vs 28.6 [2.5]; difference, −15.4; 95% CI, −22.6 to −8.2; P < .001). Thirty-nine participants (65.0%) in the depot buprenorphine group experienced 117 adverse drug reactions, mainly injection site reactions of mild intensity following subcutaneous administration, and 12 participants (20.3%) in the sublingual buprenorphine group experienced 21 adverse drug reactions. No participants withdrew from the trial medication or the trial due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, participants receiving depot buprenorphine reported improved treatment satisfaction compared with those receiving sublingual buprenorphine. The results highlight the application of patient-reported outcomes as alternative end points to traditional markers of substance use in addiction treatment outcome studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ANZCTR12618001759280 American Medical Association 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8111483/ /pubmed/33970256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9041 Text en Copyright 2021 Lintzeris N et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Lintzeris, Nicholas
Dunlop, Adrian J.
Haber, Paul S.
Lubman, Dan I.
Graham, Robert
Hutchinson, Sarah
Arunogiri, Shalini
Hayes, Victoria
Hjelmström, Peter
Svedberg, Agneta
Peterson, Stefan
Tiberg, Fredrik
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Treatment of Opioid Dependence With Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Depot vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Patient-Reported Outcomes of Treatment of Opioid Dependence With Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Depot vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Patient-Reported Outcomes of Treatment of Opioid Dependence With Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Depot vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Outcomes of Treatment of Opioid Dependence With Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Depot vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Outcomes of Treatment of Opioid Dependence With Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Depot vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Patient-Reported Outcomes of Treatment of Opioid Dependence With Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Depot vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort patient-reported outcomes of treatment of opioid dependence with weekly and monthly subcutaneous depot vs daily sublingual buprenorphine: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9041
work_keys_str_mv AT lintzerisnicholas patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dunlopadrianj patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT haberpauls patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lubmandani patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT grahamrobert patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hutchinsonsarah patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT arunogirishalini patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hayesvictoria patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hjelmstrompeter patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT svedbergagneta patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT petersonstefan patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT tibergfredrik patientreportedoutcomesoftreatmentofopioiddependencewithweeklyandmonthlysubcutaneousdepotvsdailysublingualbuprenorphinearandomizedclinicaltrial