Cargando…

Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017)

BACKGROUND: Individualization of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose is considered standard clinical practice during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Furthermore, the gonadotropin dose is regularly adjusted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fatemi, Human, Bilger, Wilma, Denis, Deborah, Griesinger, Georg, La Marca, Antonio, Longobardi, Salvatore, Mahony, Mary, Yin, Xiaoyan, D’Hooghe, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00744-x
_version_ 1783690616514805760
author Fatemi, Human
Bilger, Wilma
Denis, Deborah
Griesinger, Georg
La Marca, Antonio
Longobardi, Salvatore
Mahony, Mary
Yin, Xiaoyan
D’Hooghe, Thomas
author_facet Fatemi, Human
Bilger, Wilma
Denis, Deborah
Griesinger, Georg
La Marca, Antonio
Longobardi, Salvatore
Mahony, Mary
Yin, Xiaoyan
D’Hooghe, Thomas
author_sort Fatemi, Human
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individualization of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose is considered standard clinical practice during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Furthermore, the gonadotropin dose is regularly adjusted during COS to avoid hyper- or hypo-ovarian response, but limited data are currently available to characterize such adjustments. This review describes the frequency and direction (increase/decrease) of recombinant-human FSH (r-hFSH) dose adjustment reported in clinical trials. METHODS: We evaluated the proportion of patients undergoing ART treatment who received ≥ 1 r-hFSH dose adjustments. The inclusion criteria included studies (published Sept 2007 to Sept 2017) in women receiving ART treatment that allowed dose adjustment within the study protocol and that reported ≥ 1 dose adjustments of r-hFSH; studies not allowing/reporting dose adjustment were excluded. Data on study design, dose adjustment and patient characteristics were extracted. Point-incidence estimates were calculated per study and overall based on pooled number of cycles with dose adjustment across studies. The Clopper–Pearson method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incidence where adjustment occurred in < 10% of patients; otherwise, a normal approximation method was used. RESULTS: Initially, 1409 publications were identified, of which 318 were excluded during initial screening and 1073 were excluded after full text review for not meeting the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies (6630 cycles) reported dose adjustment: 5/18 studies (1359 cycles) reported data for an unspecified dose adjustment (direction not defined), in 10/18 studies (3952 cycles) dose increases were reported, and in 11/18 studies (5123 cycles) dose decreases were reported. The studies were performed in women with poor, normal and high response, with one study reporting in oocyte donors and one in obese women. The median day that dose adjustment was permitted was Day 6 after the start of treatment. The point estimates for incidence (95% CI) for unspecified dose adjustment, dose increases, and dose decreases were 45.3% (42.7, 48.0), 19.2% (18.0, 20.5), and 9.5% (8.7, 10.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights that, in studies in which dose adjustment was allowed and reported, the estimated incidence of r-hFSH dose adjustments during ovarian stimulation was up to 45%. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-021-00744-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8112039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81120392021-05-12 Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017) Fatemi, Human Bilger, Wilma Denis, Deborah Griesinger, Georg La Marca, Antonio Longobardi, Salvatore Mahony, Mary Yin, Xiaoyan D’Hooghe, Thomas Reprod Biol Endocrinol Review BACKGROUND: Individualization of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose is considered standard clinical practice during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Furthermore, the gonadotropin dose is regularly adjusted during COS to avoid hyper- or hypo-ovarian response, but limited data are currently available to characterize such adjustments. This review describes the frequency and direction (increase/decrease) of recombinant-human FSH (r-hFSH) dose adjustment reported in clinical trials. METHODS: We evaluated the proportion of patients undergoing ART treatment who received ≥ 1 r-hFSH dose adjustments. The inclusion criteria included studies (published Sept 2007 to Sept 2017) in women receiving ART treatment that allowed dose adjustment within the study protocol and that reported ≥ 1 dose adjustments of r-hFSH; studies not allowing/reporting dose adjustment were excluded. Data on study design, dose adjustment and patient characteristics were extracted. Point-incidence estimates were calculated per study and overall based on pooled number of cycles with dose adjustment across studies. The Clopper–Pearson method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incidence where adjustment occurred in < 10% of patients; otherwise, a normal approximation method was used. RESULTS: Initially, 1409 publications were identified, of which 318 were excluded during initial screening and 1073 were excluded after full text review for not meeting the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies (6630 cycles) reported dose adjustment: 5/18 studies (1359 cycles) reported data for an unspecified dose adjustment (direction not defined), in 10/18 studies (3952 cycles) dose increases were reported, and in 11/18 studies (5123 cycles) dose decreases were reported. The studies were performed in women with poor, normal and high response, with one study reporting in oocyte donors and one in obese women. The median day that dose adjustment was permitted was Day 6 after the start of treatment. The point estimates for incidence (95% CI) for unspecified dose adjustment, dose increases, and dose decreases were 45.3% (42.7, 48.0), 19.2% (18.0, 20.5), and 9.5% (8.7, 10.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights that, in studies in which dose adjustment was allowed and reported, the estimated incidence of r-hFSH dose adjustments during ovarian stimulation was up to 45%. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12958-021-00744-x. BioMed Central 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8112039/ /pubmed/33975610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00744-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Fatemi, Human
Bilger, Wilma
Denis, Deborah
Griesinger, Georg
La Marca, Antonio
Longobardi, Salvatore
Mahony, Mary
Yin, Xiaoyan
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017)
title Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017)
title_full Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017)
title_fullStr Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017)
title_full_unstemmed Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017)
title_short Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017)
title_sort dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (fsh) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007–2017)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00744-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemihuman doseadjustmentoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshduringovarianstimulationaspartofmedicallyassistedreproductioninclinicalstudiesasystematicreviewcovering10years20072017
AT bilgerwilma doseadjustmentoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshduringovarianstimulationaspartofmedicallyassistedreproductioninclinicalstudiesasystematicreviewcovering10years20072017
AT denisdeborah doseadjustmentoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshduringovarianstimulationaspartofmedicallyassistedreproductioninclinicalstudiesasystematicreviewcovering10years20072017
AT griesingergeorg doseadjustmentoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshduringovarianstimulationaspartofmedicallyassistedreproductioninclinicalstudiesasystematicreviewcovering10years20072017
AT lamarcaantonio doseadjustmentoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshduringovarianstimulationaspartofmedicallyassistedreproductioninclinicalstudiesasystematicreviewcovering10years20072017
AT longobardisalvatore doseadjustmentoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshduringovarianstimulationaspartofmedicallyassistedreproductioninclinicalstudiesasystematicreviewcovering10years20072017
AT mahonymary doseadjustmentoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshduringovarianstimulationaspartofmedicallyassistedreproductioninclinicalstudiesasystematicreviewcovering10years20072017
AT yinxiaoyan doseadjustmentoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshduringovarianstimulationaspartofmedicallyassistedreproductioninclinicalstudiesasystematicreviewcovering10years20072017
AT dhooghethomas doseadjustmentoffolliclestimulatinghormonefshduringovarianstimulationaspartofmedicallyassistedreproductioninclinicalstudiesasystematicreviewcovering10years20072017