Cargando…

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from 13 hospitals in Viet Nam: VINARES 2016–2017

OBJECTIVE: To analyse data from 2016–17 from a hospital-based antimicrobial resistance surveillance with national coverage in a network of hospitals Viet Nam. METHODS: We analysed data from 13 hospitals, 3 less than the dataset from the 2012–13 period. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vu, Tien Viet Dung, Choisy, Marc, Do, Thi Thuy Nga, Nguyen, Van Minh Hoang, Campbell, James I., Le, Thi Hoi, Nguyen, Vu Trung, Wertheim, Heiman F. L., Pham, Ngoc Thach, Nguyen, Van Kinh, van Doorn, H. Rogier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33971969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00937-4
_version_ 1783690620430188544
author Vu, Tien Viet Dung
Choisy, Marc
Do, Thi Thuy Nga
Nguyen, Van Minh Hoang
Campbell, James I.
Le, Thi Hoi
Nguyen, Vu Trung
Wertheim, Heiman F. L.
Pham, Ngoc Thach
Nguyen, Van Kinh
van Doorn, H. Rogier
author_facet Vu, Tien Viet Dung
Choisy, Marc
Do, Thi Thuy Nga
Nguyen, Van Minh Hoang
Campbell, James I.
Le, Thi Hoi
Nguyen, Vu Trung
Wertheim, Heiman F. L.
Pham, Ngoc Thach
Nguyen, Van Kinh
van Doorn, H. Rogier
author_sort Vu, Tien Viet Dung
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyse data from 2016–17 from a hospital-based antimicrobial resistance surveillance with national coverage in a network of hospitals Viet Nam. METHODS: We analysed data from 13 hospitals, 3 less than the dataset from the 2012–13 period. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing data from the clinical microbiology laboratories from samples sent in for routine diagnostics were used. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2018 guidelines were used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing interpretation. WHONET was used for data entry, management and analysis. RESULTS: 42,553 deduplicated isolates were included in this analysis; including 30,222 (71%) Gram-negative and 12,331 (29%) Gram-positive bacteria. 8,793 (21%) were from ICUs and 7,439 (18%) isolates were from invasive infections. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were the most frequently detected species with 9,092 (21%) and 4,833 isolates (11%), respectively; followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (3,858 isolates – 9.1%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (3,870 isolates – 9%). Bacteria were mainly isolated from sputum (8,798 isolates – 21%), blood (7,118 isolates – 17%) and urine (5,202 isolates – 12%). Among Gram-positives 3,302/4,515 isolates (73%) of S. aureus were MRSA; 99/290 (34%) of Enterococcus faecium were resistant to vancomycin; and 58% (663/1,136) of Streptococcus pneumoniae proportion were reduced susceptible to penicillin. Among Gram-negatives 59% (4,085/6,953) and 40% (1,186/2,958) of E. coli and K. pneumoniae produced ESBL and 29% (376/1,298) and 11% (961/8,830) were resistant to carbapenems, respectively. 79% (2855/3622) and 45% (1,514/3,376) of Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were carbapenem resistant, respectively. 88% (804/911) of Haemophilus influenzae were ampicillin resistant and 18/253 (7%) of Salmonella spp. and 7/46 (15%) of Shigella spp. were resistant to fluoroquinolones. The number of isolates from which data were submitted in the 2016–2017 period was twice as high as in 2012–2013. AMR proportions were higher in 2016–2017 for most pathogen-antimicrobial combinations of interest including imipenem-resistant A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. CONCLUSIONS: The data show alarmingly high and increasing resistant proportions among important organisms in Viet Nam. AMR proportions varied across hospital types and should be interpreted with caution because existing sampling bias and missing information on whether isolates were community or hospital acquired. Affordable and scalable ways to adopt a sample- or case-based approach across the network should be explored and clinical data should be integrated to help provide more accurate inferences of the surveillance data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00937-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8112055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81120552021-05-12 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from 13 hospitals in Viet Nam: VINARES 2016–2017 Vu, Tien Viet Dung Choisy, Marc Do, Thi Thuy Nga Nguyen, Van Minh Hoang Campbell, James I. Le, Thi Hoi Nguyen, Vu Trung Wertheim, Heiman F. L. Pham, Ngoc Thach Nguyen, Van Kinh van Doorn, H. Rogier Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research OBJECTIVE: To analyse data from 2016–17 from a hospital-based antimicrobial resistance surveillance with national coverage in a network of hospitals Viet Nam. METHODS: We analysed data from 13 hospitals, 3 less than the dataset from the 2012–13 period. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing data from the clinical microbiology laboratories from samples sent in for routine diagnostics were used. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2018 guidelines were used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing interpretation. WHONET was used for data entry, management and analysis. RESULTS: 42,553 deduplicated isolates were included in this analysis; including 30,222 (71%) Gram-negative and 12,331 (29%) Gram-positive bacteria. 8,793 (21%) were from ICUs and 7,439 (18%) isolates were from invasive infections. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were the most frequently detected species with 9,092 (21%) and 4,833 isolates (11%), respectively; followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (3,858 isolates – 9.1%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (3,870 isolates – 9%). Bacteria were mainly isolated from sputum (8,798 isolates – 21%), blood (7,118 isolates – 17%) and urine (5,202 isolates – 12%). Among Gram-positives 3,302/4,515 isolates (73%) of S. aureus were MRSA; 99/290 (34%) of Enterococcus faecium were resistant to vancomycin; and 58% (663/1,136) of Streptococcus pneumoniae proportion were reduced susceptible to penicillin. Among Gram-negatives 59% (4,085/6,953) and 40% (1,186/2,958) of E. coli and K. pneumoniae produced ESBL and 29% (376/1,298) and 11% (961/8,830) were resistant to carbapenems, respectively. 79% (2855/3622) and 45% (1,514/3,376) of Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were carbapenem resistant, respectively. 88% (804/911) of Haemophilus influenzae were ampicillin resistant and 18/253 (7%) of Salmonella spp. and 7/46 (15%) of Shigella spp. were resistant to fluoroquinolones. The number of isolates from which data were submitted in the 2016–2017 period was twice as high as in 2012–2013. AMR proportions were higher in 2016–2017 for most pathogen-antimicrobial combinations of interest including imipenem-resistant A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. CONCLUSIONS: The data show alarmingly high and increasing resistant proportions among important organisms in Viet Nam. AMR proportions varied across hospital types and should be interpreted with caution because existing sampling bias and missing information on whether isolates were community or hospital acquired. Affordable and scalable ways to adopt a sample- or case-based approach across the network should be explored and clinical data should be integrated to help provide more accurate inferences of the surveillance data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00937-4. BioMed Central 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8112055/ /pubmed/33971969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00937-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Vu, Tien Viet Dung
Choisy, Marc
Do, Thi Thuy Nga
Nguyen, Van Minh Hoang
Campbell, James I.
Le, Thi Hoi
Nguyen, Vu Trung
Wertheim, Heiman F. L.
Pham, Ngoc Thach
Nguyen, Van Kinh
van Doorn, H. Rogier
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from 13 hospitals in Viet Nam: VINARES 2016–2017
title Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from 13 hospitals in Viet Nam: VINARES 2016–2017
title_full Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from 13 hospitals in Viet Nam: VINARES 2016–2017
title_fullStr Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from 13 hospitals in Viet Nam: VINARES 2016–2017
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from 13 hospitals in Viet Nam: VINARES 2016–2017
title_short Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from 13 hospitals in Viet Nam: VINARES 2016–2017
title_sort antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from 13 hospitals in viet nam: vinares 2016–2017
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33971969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00937-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vutienvietdung antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT choisymarc antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT dothithuynga antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT nguyenvanminhhoang antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT campbelljamesi antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT lethihoi antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT nguyenvutrung antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT wertheimheimanfl antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT phamngocthach antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT nguyenvankinh antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT vandoornhrogier antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017
AT antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingresultsfrom13hospitalsinvietnamvinares20162017