Cargando…

Gender Difference of Cardiac Remodeling in University Athletes: Results from 2015 Gwangju Summer Universiade

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is little data about cardiac geometry in highly trained young athletes, especially female specific changes. We investigated gender difference on exercise induced cardiac remodeling (EICR) in highly trained university athletes. METHODS: A total of 1,185 university ath...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Hyun Ju, Kim, Kye Hun, Hornsby, Kyle, Park, Jae Hyeong, Park, Hyukjin, Kim, Hyung Yoon, Cho, Jae Yeong, Ahn, Youngkeun, Jeong, Myung Ho, Cho, Jeong Gwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Cardiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764011
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2020.0484
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is little data about cardiac geometry in highly trained young athletes, especially female specific changes. We investigated gender difference on exercise induced cardiac remodeling (EICR) in highly trained university athletes. METHODS: A total of 1,185 university athletes divided into 2 groups; female (n=497, 22.0±2.3 years) vs. male (n=688, 22.6±2.4 years). Remodeling of the left ventricle (LV), left atrium (LA), right ventricle (RV), and any cardiac chamber were compared. RESULTS: LV, LA, RV, and any remodeling was found in 156 (13.2%), 206 (17.4%), 82 (6.9%), and 379 athletes (31.9%), respectively. LV, LA, and any remodeling were more common in male than female athletes (n=53, 12.1% vs. n=103, 15.5%, p=0.065), (n=65, 13.1% vs. n=141, 20.5%, p<0.001), (n=144, 30.0% vs. n=235, 34.2%, p=0.058), respectively, whereas RV remodeling was significantly more common in female than male athletes (n=56, 11.3% vs. n=26, 3.8%, p<0.001). Interestingly, the development of LV, LA, and RV remodeling were not overlapped in many of athletes, suggesting different mechanism of EICR according to cardiac chamber. Various predictors including sports type, heart rate, muscle mass, fat mass, body surface area, and training time were differently involved in cardiac remodeling, and there were gender differences of these predictors for cardiac remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: EICR was common in both sex and was independently developed among cardiac chambers in highly trained university athletes. LV and LA remodeling were common in males, whereas RV remodeling was significantly more common in females demonstrating gender difference in EICR. The present study also demonstrated gender difference in the predictors of EICR.