Cargando…

Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Disasters triggered by climate and other natural hazards are increasing in frequency, severity and duration worldwide. Disasters disproportionately impact women and girls, with some evidence suggesting that violence against women and girls (VAWG) increases in disaster settings. Suggest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thurston, Alyssa Mari, Stöckl, Heidi, Ranganathan, Meghna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004377
_version_ 1783690682212286464
author Thurston, Alyssa Mari
Stöckl, Heidi
Ranganathan, Meghna
author_facet Thurston, Alyssa Mari
Stöckl, Heidi
Ranganathan, Meghna
author_sort Thurston, Alyssa Mari
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Disasters triggered by climate and other natural hazards are increasing in frequency, severity and duration worldwide. Disasters disproportionately impact women and girls, with some evidence suggesting that violence against women and girls (VAWG) increases in disaster settings. Suggested risk factors for postdisaster VAWG include increased life stressors, failure of law enforcement, exposure to high-risk environments, exacerbation of existing gender inequalities and unequal social norms. We aim to systematically appraise the global literature on the association between disasters from natural hazards and VAWG. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using the following databases: Embase, Global Health, Medline, PubMed and Social Policy and Practice and searched grey literature. We included quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods studies published in English language that examined the association between disasters from natural hazards and VAWG. We summarised the findings using a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: Of 555 non-duplicate records, we included a total of 37 quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Among the quantitative studies, eight studies found a positive association between disaster exposure and increased VAWG, and four additional studies found positive associations with some violence types but not others. Qualitative findings offered insights into three hypothesised pathways: disaster exposure associated with (1) an increase of stressors that trigger VAWG; (2) an increase of enabling environments for VAWG and (3) an exacerbation of underlying drivers of VAWG. CONCLUSION: As the first known global systematic review on the relationship between disasters from natural hazards and VAWG, this review contributes to the evidence base. We were limited by the quality of quantitative studies, specifically study designs, the measurement of variables and geographic scope. The severe health consequences of VAWG and increasing frequency of extreme events means that rigorously designed and better quality studies are needed to inform evidence-based policies and safeguard women and girls during and after disasters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8112410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81124102021-05-25 Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review Thurston, Alyssa Mari Stöckl, Heidi Ranganathan, Meghna BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Disasters triggered by climate and other natural hazards are increasing in frequency, severity and duration worldwide. Disasters disproportionately impact women and girls, with some evidence suggesting that violence against women and girls (VAWG) increases in disaster settings. Suggested risk factors for postdisaster VAWG include increased life stressors, failure of law enforcement, exposure to high-risk environments, exacerbation of existing gender inequalities and unequal social norms. We aim to systematically appraise the global literature on the association between disasters from natural hazards and VAWG. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using the following databases: Embase, Global Health, Medline, PubMed and Social Policy and Practice and searched grey literature. We included quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods studies published in English language that examined the association between disasters from natural hazards and VAWG. We summarised the findings using a narrative synthesis approach. RESULTS: Of 555 non-duplicate records, we included a total of 37 quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Among the quantitative studies, eight studies found a positive association between disaster exposure and increased VAWG, and four additional studies found positive associations with some violence types but not others. Qualitative findings offered insights into three hypothesised pathways: disaster exposure associated with (1) an increase of stressors that trigger VAWG; (2) an increase of enabling environments for VAWG and (3) an exacerbation of underlying drivers of VAWG. CONCLUSION: As the first known global systematic review on the relationship between disasters from natural hazards and VAWG, this review contributes to the evidence base. We were limited by the quality of quantitative studies, specifically study designs, the measurement of variables and geographic scope. The severe health consequences of VAWG and increasing frequency of extreme events means that rigorously designed and better quality studies are needed to inform evidence-based policies and safeguard women and girls during and after disasters. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8112410/ /pubmed/33958379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004377 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Thurston, Alyssa Mari
Stöckl, Heidi
Ranganathan, Meghna
Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review
title Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review
title_full Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review
title_fullStr Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review
title_short Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review
title_sort natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004377
work_keys_str_mv AT thurstonalyssamari naturalhazardsdisastersandviolenceagainstwomenandgirlsaglobalmixedmethodssystematicreview
AT stocklheidi naturalhazardsdisastersandviolenceagainstwomenandgirlsaglobalmixedmethodssystematicreview
AT ranganathanmeghna naturalhazardsdisastersandviolenceagainstwomenandgirlsaglobalmixedmethodssystematicreview