Cargando…
Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related ou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33972329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960 |
_version_ | 1783690685583458304 |
---|---|
author | Blauth, Michael Joeris, Alexander Rometsch, Elke Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin Wattanapanom, Pannida Jarayabhand, Rahat Poeze, Martijn Wong, Merng K Kwek, Ernest B. K. Hegeman, Johannes H Perez-Uribarri, Carlos Guerado, Enrique Revak, Thomas J Zohner, Sebastian Joseph, David Gosch, Markus |
author_facet | Blauth, Michael Joeris, Alexander Rometsch, Elke Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin Wattanapanom, Pannida Jarayabhand, Rahat Poeze, Martijn Wong, Merng K Kwek, Ernest B. K. Hegeman, Johannes H Perez-Uribarri, Carlos Guerado, Enrique Revak, Thomas J Zohner, Sebastian Joseph, David Gosch, Markus |
author_sort | Blauth, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes. DESIGN: Cohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1 year. SETTING: International (six countries, three continents) multicentre study. PARTICIPANTS: 281 patients aged ≥70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life. RESULTS: Patients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p<0.001). Analysing individual MAEs, this was significant for pneumonia (GFC: 9.2%; UCC: 2.9%; OR, 3.40 (95% CI 1.08 to 10.70), p=0.027) and delirium (GFC: 11.3%; UCC: 2.2%, OR, 5.76 (95% CI 1.64 to 20.23), p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our study hypothesis, the rate of MAEs was higher in GFCs than in UCCs. Delirium was revealed as a main contributor. Most likely, this was based on improved detection rather than a truly elevated incidence, which we interpret as positive effect of geriatric comanagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8112430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81124302021-05-25 Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study Blauth, Michael Joeris, Alexander Rometsch, Elke Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin Wattanapanom, Pannida Jarayabhand, Rahat Poeze, Martijn Wong, Merng K Kwek, Ernest B. K. Hegeman, Johannes H Perez-Uribarri, Carlos Guerado, Enrique Revak, Thomas J Zohner, Sebastian Joseph, David Gosch, Markus BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes. DESIGN: Cohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1 year. SETTING: International (six countries, three continents) multicentre study. PARTICIPANTS: 281 patients aged ≥70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life. RESULTS: Patients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p<0.001). Analysing individual MAEs, this was significant for pneumonia (GFC: 9.2%; UCC: 2.9%; OR, 3.40 (95% CI 1.08 to 10.70), p=0.027) and delirium (GFC: 11.3%; UCC: 2.2%, OR, 5.76 (95% CI 1.64 to 20.23), p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our study hypothesis, the rate of MAEs was higher in GFCs than in UCCs. Delirium was revealed as a main contributor. Most likely, this was based on improved detection rather than a truly elevated incidence, which we interpret as positive effect of geriatric comanagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8112430/ /pubmed/33972329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Blauth, Michael Joeris, Alexander Rometsch, Elke Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin Wattanapanom, Pannida Jarayabhand, Rahat Poeze, Martijn Wong, Merng K Kwek, Ernest B. K. Hegeman, Johannes H Perez-Uribarri, Carlos Guerado, Enrique Revak, Thomas J Zohner, Sebastian Joseph, David Gosch, Markus Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study |
title | Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study |
title_full | Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study |
title_fullStr | Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study |
title_full_unstemmed | Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study |
title_short | Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study |
title_sort | geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? results of a large international prospective multicentre study |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33972329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blauthmichael geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT joerisalexander geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT rometschelke geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT espinozarebmannkathrin geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT wattanapanompannida geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT jarayabhandrahat geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT poezemartijn geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT wongmerngk geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT kwekernestbk geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT hegemanjohannesh geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT perezuribarricarlos geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT gueradoenrique geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT revakthomasj geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT zohnersebastian geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT josephdavid geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy AT goschmarkus geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy |