Cargando…

Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blauth, Michael, Joeris, Alexander, Rometsch, Elke, Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin, Wattanapanom, Pannida, Jarayabhand, Rahat, Poeze, Martijn, Wong, Merng K, Kwek, Ernest B. K., Hegeman, Johannes H, Perez-Uribarri, Carlos, Guerado, Enrique, Revak, Thomas J, Zohner, Sebastian, Joseph, David, Gosch, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33972329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960
_version_ 1783690685583458304
author Blauth, Michael
Joeris, Alexander
Rometsch, Elke
Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin
Wattanapanom, Pannida
Jarayabhand, Rahat
Poeze, Martijn
Wong, Merng K
Kwek, Ernest B. K.
Hegeman, Johannes H
Perez-Uribarri, Carlos
Guerado, Enrique
Revak, Thomas J
Zohner, Sebastian
Joseph, David
Gosch, Markus
author_facet Blauth, Michael
Joeris, Alexander
Rometsch, Elke
Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin
Wattanapanom, Pannida
Jarayabhand, Rahat
Poeze, Martijn
Wong, Merng K
Kwek, Ernest B. K.
Hegeman, Johannes H
Perez-Uribarri, Carlos
Guerado, Enrique
Revak, Thomas J
Zohner, Sebastian
Joseph, David
Gosch, Markus
author_sort Blauth, Michael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes. DESIGN: Cohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1 year. SETTING: International (six countries, three continents) multicentre study. PARTICIPANTS: 281 patients aged ≥70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life. RESULTS: Patients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p<0.001). Analysing individual MAEs, this was significant for pneumonia (GFC: 9.2%; UCC: 2.9%; OR, 3.40 (95% CI 1.08 to 10.70), p=0.027) and delirium (GFC: 11.3%; UCC: 2.2%, OR, 5.76 (95% CI 1.64 to 20.23), p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our study hypothesis, the rate of MAEs was higher in GFCs than in UCCs. Delirium was revealed as a main contributor. Most likely, this was based on improved detection rather than a truly elevated incidence, which we interpret as positive effect of geriatric comanagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8112430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81124302021-05-25 Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study Blauth, Michael Joeris, Alexander Rometsch, Elke Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin Wattanapanom, Pannida Jarayabhand, Rahat Poeze, Martijn Wong, Merng K Kwek, Ernest B. K. Hegeman, Johannes H Perez-Uribarri, Carlos Guerado, Enrique Revak, Thomas J Zohner, Sebastian Joseph, David Gosch, Markus BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes. DESIGN: Cohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1 year. SETTING: International (six countries, three continents) multicentre study. PARTICIPANTS: 281 patients aged ≥70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life. RESULTS: Patients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p<0.001). Analysing individual MAEs, this was significant for pneumonia (GFC: 9.2%; UCC: 2.9%; OR, 3.40 (95% CI 1.08 to 10.70), p=0.027) and delirium (GFC: 11.3%; UCC: 2.2%, OR, 5.76 (95% CI 1.64 to 20.23), p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our study hypothesis, the rate of MAEs was higher in GFCs than in UCCs. Delirium was revealed as a main contributor. Most likely, this was based on improved detection rather than a truly elevated incidence, which we interpret as positive effect of geriatric comanagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8112430/ /pubmed/33972329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Blauth, Michael
Joeris, Alexander
Rometsch, Elke
Espinoza-Rebmann, Kathrin
Wattanapanom, Pannida
Jarayabhand, Rahat
Poeze, Martijn
Wong, Merng K
Kwek, Ernest B. K.
Hegeman, Johannes H
Perez-Uribarri, Carlos
Guerado, Enrique
Revak, Thomas J
Zohner, Sebastian
Joseph, David
Gosch, Markus
Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study
title Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study
title_full Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study
title_fullStr Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study
title_full_unstemmed Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study
title_short Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study
title_sort geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? results of a large international prospective multicentre study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112430/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33972329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960
work_keys_str_mv AT blauthmichael geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT joerisalexander geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT rometschelke geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT espinozarebmannkathrin geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT wattanapanompannida geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT jarayabhandrahat geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT poezemartijn geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT wongmerngk geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT kwekernestbk geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT hegemanjohannesh geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT perezuribarricarlos geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT gueradoenrique geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT revakthomasj geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT zohnersebastian geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT josephdavid geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT goschmarkus geriatricfracturecentrevsusualcareafterproximalfemurfractureinolderpatientswhatarethebenefitsresultsofalargeinternationalprospectivemulticentrestudy