Cargando…
Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making.
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought with it crucial policy- and decision-making situations, especially when making judgments between financial and health concerns. One particularly relevant decision-making phenomenon is the prominence effect, where decision-makers base their de...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035906 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27324.2 |
_version_ | 1783690689834385408 |
---|---|
author | Maaravi, Yossi Heller, Ben |
author_facet | Maaravi, Yossi Heller, Ben |
author_sort | Maaravi, Yossi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought with it crucial policy- and decision-making situations, especially when making judgments between financial and health concerns. One particularly relevant decision-making phenomenon is the prominence effect, where decision-makers base their decisions on the most prominent attribute of the object at hand (e.g., health concerns) rather than weigh all the attributes together. This bias diminishes when the decision-making mode inhibits heuristic processes. In this study, we tested the prominence of health vs. financial concerns across two decision-making modes - choice (prone to heuristics) and matching (mitigates heuristics) - during the peak of the COVID-19 in the UK using Tversky et al.’s classic experimental paradigm. We added to the classic experimental design a priming condition. Participants were presented with two casualty-minimization programs, differing in lives saved and costs: program X would save 100 lives at the cost of 55-million-pound sterling, whereas program Y would save 30 lives at the cost of 12-million-pound sterling. Half of the participants were required to choose between the programs (choice condition). The other half were not given the cost of program X and were asked to determine what the cost should be to make it as equally attractive as the program Y. Participants in both groups were primed for either: a) financial concerns; b) health concerns; or c) control (no priming). Results showed that in the choice condition, unless primed for financial concerns, health concerns are more prominent. In the matching condition, on the other hand, the prominence of health concerns did not affect decision-makers, as they all “preferred” the cheaper option. These results add further support to the practical relevance of using the proper decision-making modes in times of consequential crises where multiple concerns, interests, and parties are involved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8112458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81124582021-05-24 Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making. Maaravi, Yossi Heller, Ben F1000Res Brief Report The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought with it crucial policy- and decision-making situations, especially when making judgments between financial and health concerns. One particularly relevant decision-making phenomenon is the prominence effect, where decision-makers base their decisions on the most prominent attribute of the object at hand (e.g., health concerns) rather than weigh all the attributes together. This bias diminishes when the decision-making mode inhibits heuristic processes. In this study, we tested the prominence of health vs. financial concerns across two decision-making modes - choice (prone to heuristics) and matching (mitigates heuristics) - during the peak of the COVID-19 in the UK using Tversky et al.’s classic experimental paradigm. We added to the classic experimental design a priming condition. Participants were presented with two casualty-minimization programs, differing in lives saved and costs: program X would save 100 lives at the cost of 55-million-pound sterling, whereas program Y would save 30 lives at the cost of 12-million-pound sterling. Half of the participants were required to choose between the programs (choice condition). The other half were not given the cost of program X and were asked to determine what the cost should be to make it as equally attractive as the program Y. Participants in both groups were primed for either: a) financial concerns; b) health concerns; or c) control (no priming). Results showed that in the choice condition, unless primed for financial concerns, health concerns are more prominent. In the matching condition, on the other hand, the prominence of health concerns did not affect decision-makers, as they all “preferred” the cheaper option. These results add further support to the practical relevance of using the proper decision-making modes in times of consequential crises where multiple concerns, interests, and parties are involved. F1000 Research Limited 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8112458/ /pubmed/34035906 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27324.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Maaravi Y and Heller B https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Maaravi, Yossi Heller, Ben Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making. |
title | Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making. |
title_full | Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making. |
title_fullStr | Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making. |
title_full_unstemmed | Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making. |
title_short | Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making. |
title_sort | studying the prominence effect amid the covid-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making. |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035906 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27324.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maaraviyossi studyingtheprominenceeffectamidthecovid19crisisimplicationsforpublichealthpolicydecisionmaking AT hellerben studyingtheprominenceeffectamidthecovid19crisisimplicationsforpublichealthpolicydecisionmaking |