Cargando…

Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought with it crucial policy- and decision-making situations, especially when making judgments between financial and health concerns. One particularly relevant decision-making phenomenon is the prominence effect, where decision-makers base their de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maaravi, Yossi, Heller, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035906
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27324.2
_version_ 1783690689834385408
author Maaravi, Yossi
Heller, Ben
author_facet Maaravi, Yossi
Heller, Ben
author_sort Maaravi, Yossi
collection PubMed
description The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought with it crucial policy- and decision-making situations, especially when making judgments between financial and health concerns. One particularly relevant decision-making phenomenon is the prominence effect, where decision-makers base their decisions on the most prominent attribute of the object at hand (e.g., health concerns) rather than weigh all the attributes together. This bias diminishes when the decision-making mode inhibits heuristic processes. In this study, we tested the prominence of health vs. financial concerns across two decision-making modes - choice (prone to heuristics) and matching (mitigates heuristics) - during the peak of the COVID-19 in the UK using Tversky et al.’s classic experimental paradigm. We added to the classic experimental design a priming condition. Participants were presented with two casualty-minimization programs, differing in lives saved and costs: program X would save 100 lives at the cost of 55-million-pound sterling, whereas program Y would save 30 lives at the cost of 12-million-pound sterling. Half of the participants were required to choose between the programs (choice condition). The other half were not given the cost of program X and were asked to determine what the cost should be to make it as equally attractive as the program Y. Participants in both groups were primed for either: a) financial concerns; b) health concerns; or c) control (no priming). Results showed that in the choice condition, unless primed for financial concerns, health concerns are more prominent. In the matching condition, on the other hand, the prominence of health concerns did not affect decision-makers, as they all “preferred” the cheaper option. These results add further support to the practical relevance of using the proper decision-making modes in times of consequential crises where multiple concerns, interests, and parties are involved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8112458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81124582021-05-24 Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making. Maaravi, Yossi Heller, Ben F1000Res Brief Report The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought with it crucial policy- and decision-making situations, especially when making judgments between financial and health concerns. One particularly relevant decision-making phenomenon is the prominence effect, where decision-makers base their decisions on the most prominent attribute of the object at hand (e.g., health concerns) rather than weigh all the attributes together. This bias diminishes when the decision-making mode inhibits heuristic processes. In this study, we tested the prominence of health vs. financial concerns across two decision-making modes - choice (prone to heuristics) and matching (mitigates heuristics) - during the peak of the COVID-19 in the UK using Tversky et al.’s classic experimental paradigm. We added to the classic experimental design a priming condition. Participants were presented with two casualty-minimization programs, differing in lives saved and costs: program X would save 100 lives at the cost of 55-million-pound sterling, whereas program Y would save 30 lives at the cost of 12-million-pound sterling. Half of the participants were required to choose between the programs (choice condition). The other half were not given the cost of program X and were asked to determine what the cost should be to make it as equally attractive as the program Y. Participants in both groups were primed for either: a) financial concerns; b) health concerns; or c) control (no priming). Results showed that in the choice condition, unless primed for financial concerns, health concerns are more prominent. In the matching condition, on the other hand, the prominence of health concerns did not affect decision-makers, as they all “preferred” the cheaper option. These results add further support to the practical relevance of using the proper decision-making modes in times of consequential crises where multiple concerns, interests, and parties are involved. F1000 Research Limited 2021-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8112458/ /pubmed/34035906 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27324.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Maaravi Y and Heller B https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Maaravi, Yossi
Heller, Ben
Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making.
title Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making.
title_full Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making.
title_fullStr Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making.
title_full_unstemmed Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making.
title_short Studying the prominence effect amid the COVID-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making.
title_sort studying the prominence effect amid the covid-19 crisis: implications for public health policy decision-making.
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035906
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27324.2
work_keys_str_mv AT maaraviyossi studyingtheprominenceeffectamidthecovid19crisisimplicationsforpublichealthpolicydecisionmaking
AT hellerben studyingtheprominenceeffectamidthecovid19crisisimplicationsforpublichealthpolicydecisionmaking