Cargando…

Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque – are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability?

Atherosclerosis (ATS) is still considered as a major, global health problem. For a deeper understanding of its pathogenesis, in the last years the research was translated from tissue visible events to molecular mechanisms. Osteopontin (OPN) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) are two molecules that have been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strobescu-Ciobanu, Cristina, Giuşcă, Simona Eliza, Căruntu, Irina-Draga, Amălinei, Cornelia, Rusu, Andreea, Cojocaru, Elena, Popa, Radu Florin, Lupaşcu, Cristian Dumitru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical Sciences, Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817720
http://dx.doi.org/10.47162/RJME.61.3.17
_version_ 1783690738858459136
author Strobescu-Ciobanu, Cristina
Giuşcă, Simona Eliza
Căruntu, Irina-Draga
Amălinei, Cornelia
Rusu, Andreea
Cojocaru, Elena
Popa, Radu Florin
Lupaşcu, Cristian Dumitru
author_facet Strobescu-Ciobanu, Cristina
Giuşcă, Simona Eliza
Căruntu, Irina-Draga
Amălinei, Cornelia
Rusu, Andreea
Cojocaru, Elena
Popa, Radu Florin
Lupaşcu, Cristian Dumitru
author_sort Strobescu-Ciobanu, Cristina
collection PubMed
description Atherosclerosis (ATS) is still considered as a major, global health problem. For a deeper understanding of its pathogenesis, in the last years the research was translated from tissue visible events to molecular mechanisms. Osteopontin (OPN) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) are two molecules that have been associated with the initiation and progression of ATS lesions. The aim of our study was to assess the OPN and OPG expression in advanced stages of carotid ATS, to analyze the correlation between these markers and the ultrasonographic plaque properties, pointing out the identification of possible patterns that can predict plaque vulnerability and risks of restenosis. The study group comprised 49 consecutive patients (38 males and 11 females) diagnosed with carotid stenotic lesions by using ultrasonography. The carotid endarterectomy specimens were standardly processed for histopathological and immunohistochemical exams. The OPN and OPG expression was semi-quantitatively assessed. Our results sustained the relationship between histological American Heart Association (AHA) type and ultrasonographic classification (echogenic versus echolucent) (p<0.001). The semi-quantitative analysis showed that in most cases (31 plaques) OPG and OPN had opposite expressions, whereas in the remaining cases (18 plaques) the expression was similar. There were no correlations between low versus high expression of intra-plaque OPN and OPG (p=0.335). We found significant correlation for OPN and plaque echogenicity (p=0.011), but not for OPG (p=0.079). OPN expression (low versus high) was correlated with plaque type (stable versus unstable) (p=0.036), plaque ulceration (p=0.009) and inflammation (p<0.001). OPG expression (low versus high) did not reveal statistically significant differences with plaque type (stable versus unstable) and vulnerability plaque parameters, respectively. OPG and OPN co-exist in carotid atherosclerotic plaque demonstrating a modulatory role in inflammatory and calcification processes. OPG is strongly expressed in stable, calcified plaques, while OPN is poorly expressed in calcified plaques and in plaques without hemorrhage, ulceration, inflammation, or necrosis. Starting from the molecular mechanisms, further studies of biomarkers are important to identify new therapeutic resources meant to prevent and treat vascular calcification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8112796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academy of Medical Sciences, Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81127962021-06-01 Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque – are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability? Strobescu-Ciobanu, Cristina Giuşcă, Simona Eliza Căruntu, Irina-Draga Amălinei, Cornelia Rusu, Andreea Cojocaru, Elena Popa, Radu Florin Lupaşcu, Cristian Dumitru Rom J Morphol Embryol Original Paper Atherosclerosis (ATS) is still considered as a major, global health problem. For a deeper understanding of its pathogenesis, in the last years the research was translated from tissue visible events to molecular mechanisms. Osteopontin (OPN) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) are two molecules that have been associated with the initiation and progression of ATS lesions. The aim of our study was to assess the OPN and OPG expression in advanced stages of carotid ATS, to analyze the correlation between these markers and the ultrasonographic plaque properties, pointing out the identification of possible patterns that can predict plaque vulnerability and risks of restenosis. The study group comprised 49 consecutive patients (38 males and 11 females) diagnosed with carotid stenotic lesions by using ultrasonography. The carotid endarterectomy specimens were standardly processed for histopathological and immunohistochemical exams. The OPN and OPG expression was semi-quantitatively assessed. Our results sustained the relationship between histological American Heart Association (AHA) type and ultrasonographic classification (echogenic versus echolucent) (p<0.001). The semi-quantitative analysis showed that in most cases (31 plaques) OPG and OPN had opposite expressions, whereas in the remaining cases (18 plaques) the expression was similar. There were no correlations between low versus high expression of intra-plaque OPN and OPG (p=0.335). We found significant correlation for OPN and plaque echogenicity (p=0.011), but not for OPG (p=0.079). OPN expression (low versus high) was correlated with plaque type (stable versus unstable) (p=0.036), plaque ulceration (p=0.009) and inflammation (p<0.001). OPG expression (low versus high) did not reveal statistically significant differences with plaque type (stable versus unstable) and vulnerability plaque parameters, respectively. OPG and OPN co-exist in carotid atherosclerotic plaque demonstrating a modulatory role in inflammatory and calcification processes. OPG is strongly expressed in stable, calcified plaques, while OPN is poorly expressed in calcified plaques and in plaques without hemorrhage, ulceration, inflammation, or necrosis. Starting from the molecular mechanisms, further studies of biomarkers are important to identify new therapeutic resources meant to prevent and treat vascular calcification. Academy of Medical Sciences, Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest 2020 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8112796/ /pubmed/33817720 http://dx.doi.org/10.47162/RJME.61.3.17 Text en Copyright © 2020, Academy of Medical Sciences, Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License, which permits unrestricted use, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium, non-commercially, provided the new creations are licensed under identical terms as the original work and the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Strobescu-Ciobanu, Cristina
Giuşcă, Simona Eliza
Căruntu, Irina-Draga
Amălinei, Cornelia
Rusu, Andreea
Cojocaru, Elena
Popa, Radu Florin
Lupaşcu, Cristian Dumitru
Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque – are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability?
title Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque – are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability?
title_full Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque – are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability?
title_fullStr Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque – are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability?
title_full_unstemmed Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque – are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability?
title_short Osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque – are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability?
title_sort osteopontin and osteoprotegerin in atherosclerotic plaque – are they significant markers of plaque vulnerability?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33817720
http://dx.doi.org/10.47162/RJME.61.3.17
work_keys_str_mv AT strobescuciobanucristina osteopontinandosteoprotegerininatheroscleroticplaquearetheysignificantmarkersofplaquevulnerability
AT giuscasimonaeliza osteopontinandosteoprotegerininatheroscleroticplaquearetheysignificantmarkersofplaquevulnerability
AT caruntuirinadraga osteopontinandosteoprotegerininatheroscleroticplaquearetheysignificantmarkersofplaquevulnerability
AT amalineicornelia osteopontinandosteoprotegerininatheroscleroticplaquearetheysignificantmarkersofplaquevulnerability
AT rusuandreea osteopontinandosteoprotegerininatheroscleroticplaquearetheysignificantmarkersofplaquevulnerability
AT cojocaruelena osteopontinandosteoprotegerininatheroscleroticplaquearetheysignificantmarkersofplaquevulnerability
AT poparaduflorin osteopontinandosteoprotegerininatheroscleroticplaquearetheysignificantmarkersofplaquevulnerability
AT lupascucristiandumitru osteopontinandosteoprotegerininatheroscleroticplaquearetheysignificantmarkersofplaquevulnerability