Cargando…
Which Is a Better Skeletal Muscle Mass Index for the Evaluation of Physical Abilities: The Present Height or Maximum Height?
OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia and osteoporosis often coexist in older adults. Sarcopenia is diagnosed using the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), which is calculated as the appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM)/(present height)(2), although patients with osteoporosis frequently have a loss of body height....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33229805 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5792-20 |
_version_ | 1783690776799084544 |
---|---|
author | Tanaka, Ken-ichiro Morisato, Yuki Nakajima, Hirofumi Kanasaki, Keizo Sugimoto, Toshitsugu Kanazawa, Ippei |
author_facet | Tanaka, Ken-ichiro Morisato, Yuki Nakajima, Hirofumi Kanasaki, Keizo Sugimoto, Toshitsugu Kanazawa, Ippei |
author_sort | Tanaka, Ken-ichiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia and osteoporosis often coexist in older adults. Sarcopenia is diagnosed using the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), which is calculated as the appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM)/(present height)(2), although patients with osteoporosis frequently have a loss of body height. We therefore investigated whether the present height or maximum height is more useful for calculating the SMI in the evaluation of physical abilities. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association of the SMI with physical abilities, such as the grip strength and gait speed, in 587 postmenopausal women. The SMI was evaluated using whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The SMI [(ASM)/(present height)(2)], modified SMI (mSMI) [(ASM)/(maximum height)(2)], and SMI difference (ΔSMI) (mSMI-SMI) were calculated. RESULTS: Age and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted regression analyses showed that the SMI (β=0.30, p<0.001 and β=0.14, p=0.034) and mSMI (β=0.40, p<0.001 and β=0.29, p<0.001) were positively associated while the ΔSMI was negatively associated with the grip strength and gait speed (β=-0.15, p<0.001 and β=-0.24, p<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the age, BMI, and presence of osteoporotic fractures-adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that a low mSMI (<5.4 kg/m(2)) was significantly associated with a low grip strength (<18 kg) and slow gait speed (1.0 m/s) [odds ratio (OR)=2.45, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.52-3.95 per SD increase, p<0.001; and OR=1.73, 95% CI=1.01-2.96, p=0.042, respectively], although a low SMI showed no such relationship (p=0.052 and p=0.813, respectively). CONCLUSION: The mSMI using the maximum height is more useful for evaluating physical abilities than conventional SMI estimation in postmenopausal women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8112974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81129742021-05-18 Which Is a Better Skeletal Muscle Mass Index for the Evaluation of Physical Abilities: The Present Height or Maximum Height? Tanaka, Ken-ichiro Morisato, Yuki Nakajima, Hirofumi Kanasaki, Keizo Sugimoto, Toshitsugu Kanazawa, Ippei Intern Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia and osteoporosis often coexist in older adults. Sarcopenia is diagnosed using the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), which is calculated as the appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM)/(present height)(2), although patients with osteoporosis frequently have a loss of body height. We therefore investigated whether the present height or maximum height is more useful for calculating the SMI in the evaluation of physical abilities. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association of the SMI with physical abilities, such as the grip strength and gait speed, in 587 postmenopausal women. The SMI was evaluated using whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The SMI [(ASM)/(present height)(2)], modified SMI (mSMI) [(ASM)/(maximum height)(2)], and SMI difference (ΔSMI) (mSMI-SMI) were calculated. RESULTS: Age and body mass index (BMI)-adjusted regression analyses showed that the SMI (β=0.30, p<0.001 and β=0.14, p=0.034) and mSMI (β=0.40, p<0.001 and β=0.29, p<0.001) were positively associated while the ΔSMI was negatively associated with the grip strength and gait speed (β=-0.15, p<0.001 and β=-0.24, p<0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the age, BMI, and presence of osteoporotic fractures-adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that a low mSMI (<5.4 kg/m(2)) was significantly associated with a low grip strength (<18 kg) and slow gait speed (1.0 m/s) [odds ratio (OR)=2.45, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.52-3.95 per SD increase, p<0.001; and OR=1.73, 95% CI=1.01-2.96, p=0.042, respectively], although a low SMI showed no such relationship (p=0.052 and p=0.813, respectively). CONCLUSION: The mSMI using the maximum height is more useful for evaluating physical abilities than conventional SMI estimation in postmenopausal women. The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 2020-11-23 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8112974/ /pubmed/33229805 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5792-20 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/The Internal Medicine is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tanaka, Ken-ichiro Morisato, Yuki Nakajima, Hirofumi Kanasaki, Keizo Sugimoto, Toshitsugu Kanazawa, Ippei Which Is a Better Skeletal Muscle Mass Index for the Evaluation of Physical Abilities: The Present Height or Maximum Height? |
title | Which Is a Better Skeletal Muscle Mass Index for the Evaluation of Physical Abilities: The Present Height or Maximum Height? |
title_full | Which Is a Better Skeletal Muscle Mass Index for the Evaluation of Physical Abilities: The Present Height or Maximum Height? |
title_fullStr | Which Is a Better Skeletal Muscle Mass Index for the Evaluation of Physical Abilities: The Present Height or Maximum Height? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which Is a Better Skeletal Muscle Mass Index for the Evaluation of Physical Abilities: The Present Height or Maximum Height? |
title_short | Which Is a Better Skeletal Muscle Mass Index for the Evaluation of Physical Abilities: The Present Height or Maximum Height? |
title_sort | which is a better skeletal muscle mass index for the evaluation of physical abilities: the present height or maximum height? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33229805 http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5792-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanakakenichiro whichisabetterskeletalmusclemassindexfortheevaluationofphysicalabilitiesthepresentheightormaximumheight AT morisatoyuki whichisabetterskeletalmusclemassindexfortheevaluationofphysicalabilitiesthepresentheightormaximumheight AT nakajimahirofumi whichisabetterskeletalmusclemassindexfortheevaluationofphysicalabilitiesthepresentheightormaximumheight AT kanasakikeizo whichisabetterskeletalmusclemassindexfortheevaluationofphysicalabilitiesthepresentheightormaximumheight AT sugimototoshitsugu whichisabetterskeletalmusclemassindexfortheevaluationofphysicalabilitiesthepresentheightormaximumheight AT kanazawaippei whichisabetterskeletalmusclemassindexfortheevaluationofphysicalabilitiesthepresentheightormaximumheight |