Cargando…

The End of Liberty

Theorists treat liberty as a great equalizer. We can’t easily distribute equal welfare, but we can purport to distribute equal liberty. In fact, however, nothing about “equal liberty” is meaningfully equal. To demonstrate, I turn not to familiar cases of distributing positive goods but to the distri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kolber, Adam J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09568-7
_version_ 1783690783200641024
author Kolber, Adam J.
author_facet Kolber, Adam J.
author_sort Kolber, Adam J.
collection PubMed
description Theorists treat liberty as a great equalizer. We can’t easily distribute equal welfare, but we can purport to distribute equal liberty. In fact, however, nothing about “equal liberty” is meaningfully equal. To demonstrate, I turn not to familiar cases of distributing positive goods but to the distribution of a negative good, namely carceral punishment. Many theorists believe we should impose proportional punishment by depriving offenders of liberty in proportion to their blameworthiness. In this manner, equally blameworthy offenders are said to receive equal punishment when incarcerated for the same period of time. Equal periods of incarceration do not yield equal punishments, however, because liberty cannot serve as the great equalizer theorists hope for. Pretending it can prevents us from justifying the full harms of punishment or leads to such counterintuitive results that it makes proportional punishment an unattractive goal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8113001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81130012021-05-12 The End of Liberty Kolber, Adam J. Crim Law Philos Original Paper Theorists treat liberty as a great equalizer. We can’t easily distribute equal welfare, but we can purport to distribute equal liberty. In fact, however, nothing about “equal liberty” is meaningfully equal. To demonstrate, I turn not to familiar cases of distributing positive goods but to the distribution of a negative good, namely carceral punishment. Many theorists believe we should impose proportional punishment by depriving offenders of liberty in proportion to their blameworthiness. In this manner, equally blameworthy offenders are said to receive equal punishment when incarcerated for the same period of time. Equal periods of incarceration do not yield equal punishments, however, because liberty cannot serve as the great equalizer theorists hope for. Pretending it can prevents us from justifying the full harms of punishment or leads to such counterintuitive results that it makes proportional punishment an unattractive goal. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8113001/ /pubmed/33995689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09568-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kolber, Adam J.
The End of Liberty
title The End of Liberty
title_full The End of Liberty
title_fullStr The End of Liberty
title_full_unstemmed The End of Liberty
title_short The End of Liberty
title_sort end of liberty
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09568-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kolberadamj theendofliberty
AT kolberadamj endofliberty