Cargando…
The End of Liberty
Theorists treat liberty as a great equalizer. We can’t easily distribute equal welfare, but we can purport to distribute equal liberty. In fact, however, nothing about “equal liberty” is meaningfully equal. To demonstrate, I turn not to familiar cases of distributing positive goods but to the distri...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09568-7 |
_version_ | 1783690783200641024 |
---|---|
author | Kolber, Adam J. |
author_facet | Kolber, Adam J. |
author_sort | Kolber, Adam J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Theorists treat liberty as a great equalizer. We can’t easily distribute equal welfare, but we can purport to distribute equal liberty. In fact, however, nothing about “equal liberty” is meaningfully equal. To demonstrate, I turn not to familiar cases of distributing positive goods but to the distribution of a negative good, namely carceral punishment. Many theorists believe we should impose proportional punishment by depriving offenders of liberty in proportion to their blameworthiness. In this manner, equally blameworthy offenders are said to receive equal punishment when incarcerated for the same period of time. Equal periods of incarceration do not yield equal punishments, however, because liberty cannot serve as the great equalizer theorists hope for. Pretending it can prevents us from justifying the full harms of punishment or leads to such counterintuitive results that it makes proportional punishment an unattractive goal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8113001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81130012021-05-12 The End of Liberty Kolber, Adam J. Crim Law Philos Original Paper Theorists treat liberty as a great equalizer. We can’t easily distribute equal welfare, but we can purport to distribute equal liberty. In fact, however, nothing about “equal liberty” is meaningfully equal. To demonstrate, I turn not to familiar cases of distributing positive goods but to the distribution of a negative good, namely carceral punishment. Many theorists believe we should impose proportional punishment by depriving offenders of liberty in proportion to their blameworthiness. In this manner, equally blameworthy offenders are said to receive equal punishment when incarcerated for the same period of time. Equal periods of incarceration do not yield equal punishments, however, because liberty cannot serve as the great equalizer theorists hope for. Pretending it can prevents us from justifying the full harms of punishment or leads to such counterintuitive results that it makes proportional punishment an unattractive goal. Springer Netherlands 2021-05-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8113001/ /pubmed/33995689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09568-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kolber, Adam J. The End of Liberty |
title | The End of Liberty |
title_full | The End of Liberty |
title_fullStr | The End of Liberty |
title_full_unstemmed | The End of Liberty |
title_short | The End of Liberty |
title_sort | end of liberty |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09568-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolberadamj theendofliberty AT kolberadamj endofliberty |