Cargando…
A 6-month inhalation toxicology study in Apoe(−/−) mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract
Cigarette smoking is the major cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Considerable attention has been paid to the reduced harm potential of nicotine-containing inhalable products such as electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). We investigated the effects of mainstream cigarette smoke (CS) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33963423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03020-4 |
_version_ | 1783690806253584384 |
---|---|
author | Wong, Ee Tsin Szostak, Justyna Titz, Bjoern Lee, Tom Wong, Sin Kei Lavrynenko, Oksana Merg, Celine Corciulo, Maica Simicevic, Jovan Auberson, Mehdi Peric, Dariusz Dulize, Remi Bornand, David Loh, Guo Jie Lee, Kyeonghee Monica Zhang, Jingjie Miller, John H. Schlage, Walter K. Guedj, Emmanuel Schneider, Thomas Phillips, Blaine Leroy, Patrice Choukrallah, Mohamed Amin Sierro, Nicolas Buettner, Ansgar Xiang, Yang Kuczaj, Arkadiusz Ivanov, Nikolai V. Luettich, Karsta Vanscheeuwijck, Patrick Peitsch, Manuel C. Hoeng, Julia |
author_facet | Wong, Ee Tsin Szostak, Justyna Titz, Bjoern Lee, Tom Wong, Sin Kei Lavrynenko, Oksana Merg, Celine Corciulo, Maica Simicevic, Jovan Auberson, Mehdi Peric, Dariusz Dulize, Remi Bornand, David Loh, Guo Jie Lee, Kyeonghee Monica Zhang, Jingjie Miller, John H. Schlage, Walter K. Guedj, Emmanuel Schneider, Thomas Phillips, Blaine Leroy, Patrice Choukrallah, Mohamed Amin Sierro, Nicolas Buettner, Ansgar Xiang, Yang Kuczaj, Arkadiusz Ivanov, Nikolai V. Luettich, Karsta Vanscheeuwijck, Patrick Peitsch, Manuel C. Hoeng, Julia |
author_sort | Wong, Ee Tsin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cigarette smoking is the major cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Considerable attention has been paid to the reduced harm potential of nicotine-containing inhalable products such as electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). We investigated the effects of mainstream cigarette smoke (CS) and e-vapor aerosols (containing nicotine and flavor) generated by a capillary aerosol generator on emphysematous changes, lung function, and molecular alterations in the respiratory system of female Apoe(−/−) mice. Mice were exposed daily (3 h/day, 5 days/week) for 6 months to aerosols from three different e-vapor formulations—(1) carrier (propylene glycol and vegetable glycerol), (2) base (carrier and nicotine), or (3) test (base and flavor)—or to CS from 3R4F reference cigarettes. The CS and base/test aerosol concentrations were matched at 35 µg nicotine/L. CS exposure, but not e-vapor exposure, led to impairment of lung function (pressure–volume loop area, A and K parameters, quasi-static elastance and compliance) and caused marked lung inflammation and emphysematous changes, which were confirmed histopathologically and morphometrically. CS exposure caused lung transcriptome (activation of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses), lipidome, and proteome dysregulation and changes in DNA methylation; in contrast, these effects were substantially reduced in response to the e-vapor aerosol exposure. Compared with sham, aerosol exposure (carrier, base, and test) caused a slight impact on lung inflammation and epithelia irritation. Our results demonstrated that, in comparison with CS, e-vapor aerosols induced substantially lower biological and pathological changes in the respiratory tract associated with chronic inflammation and emphysema. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00204-021-03020-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8113187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81131872021-05-13 A 6-month inhalation toxicology study in Apoe(−/−) mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract Wong, Ee Tsin Szostak, Justyna Titz, Bjoern Lee, Tom Wong, Sin Kei Lavrynenko, Oksana Merg, Celine Corciulo, Maica Simicevic, Jovan Auberson, Mehdi Peric, Dariusz Dulize, Remi Bornand, David Loh, Guo Jie Lee, Kyeonghee Monica Zhang, Jingjie Miller, John H. Schlage, Walter K. Guedj, Emmanuel Schneider, Thomas Phillips, Blaine Leroy, Patrice Choukrallah, Mohamed Amin Sierro, Nicolas Buettner, Ansgar Xiang, Yang Kuczaj, Arkadiusz Ivanov, Nikolai V. Luettich, Karsta Vanscheeuwijck, Patrick Peitsch, Manuel C. Hoeng, Julia Arch Toxicol Organ Toxicity and Mechanisms Cigarette smoking is the major cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Considerable attention has been paid to the reduced harm potential of nicotine-containing inhalable products such as electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). We investigated the effects of mainstream cigarette smoke (CS) and e-vapor aerosols (containing nicotine and flavor) generated by a capillary aerosol generator on emphysematous changes, lung function, and molecular alterations in the respiratory system of female Apoe(−/−) mice. Mice were exposed daily (3 h/day, 5 days/week) for 6 months to aerosols from three different e-vapor formulations—(1) carrier (propylene glycol and vegetable glycerol), (2) base (carrier and nicotine), or (3) test (base and flavor)—or to CS from 3R4F reference cigarettes. The CS and base/test aerosol concentrations were matched at 35 µg nicotine/L. CS exposure, but not e-vapor exposure, led to impairment of lung function (pressure–volume loop area, A and K parameters, quasi-static elastance and compliance) and caused marked lung inflammation and emphysematous changes, which were confirmed histopathologically and morphometrically. CS exposure caused lung transcriptome (activation of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses), lipidome, and proteome dysregulation and changes in DNA methylation; in contrast, these effects were substantially reduced in response to the e-vapor aerosol exposure. Compared with sham, aerosol exposure (carrier, base, and test) caused a slight impact on lung inflammation and epithelia irritation. Our results demonstrated that, in comparison with CS, e-vapor aerosols induced substantially lower biological and pathological changes in the respiratory tract associated with chronic inflammation and emphysema. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00204-021-03020-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8113187/ /pubmed/33963423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03020-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Organ Toxicity and Mechanisms Wong, Ee Tsin Szostak, Justyna Titz, Bjoern Lee, Tom Wong, Sin Kei Lavrynenko, Oksana Merg, Celine Corciulo, Maica Simicevic, Jovan Auberson, Mehdi Peric, Dariusz Dulize, Remi Bornand, David Loh, Guo Jie Lee, Kyeonghee Monica Zhang, Jingjie Miller, John H. Schlage, Walter K. Guedj, Emmanuel Schneider, Thomas Phillips, Blaine Leroy, Patrice Choukrallah, Mohamed Amin Sierro, Nicolas Buettner, Ansgar Xiang, Yang Kuczaj, Arkadiusz Ivanov, Nikolai V. Luettich, Karsta Vanscheeuwijck, Patrick Peitsch, Manuel C. Hoeng, Julia A 6-month inhalation toxicology study in Apoe(−/−) mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract |
title | A 6-month inhalation toxicology study in Apoe(−/−) mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract |
title_full | A 6-month inhalation toxicology study in Apoe(−/−) mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract |
title_fullStr | A 6-month inhalation toxicology study in Apoe(−/−) mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract |
title_full_unstemmed | A 6-month inhalation toxicology study in Apoe(−/−) mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract |
title_short | A 6-month inhalation toxicology study in Apoe(−/−) mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract |
title_sort | 6-month inhalation toxicology study in apoe(−/−) mice demonstrates substantially lower effects of e-vapor aerosol compared with cigarette smoke in the respiratory tract |
topic | Organ Toxicity and Mechanisms |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33963423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03020-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongeetsin a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT szostakjustyna a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT titzbjoern a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT leetom a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT wongsinkei a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT lavrynenkooksana a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT mergceline a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT corciulomaica a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT simicevicjovan a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT aubersonmehdi a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT pericdariusz a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT dulizeremi a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT bornanddavid a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT lohguojie a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT leekyeongheemonica a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT zhangjingjie a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT millerjohnh a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT schlagewalterk a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT guedjemmanuel a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT schneiderthomas a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT phillipsblaine a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT leroypatrice a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT choukrallahmohamedamin a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT sierronicolas a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT buettneransgar a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT xiangyang a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT kuczajarkadiusz a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT ivanovnikolaiv a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT luettichkarsta a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT vanscheeuwijckpatrick a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT peitschmanuelc a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT hoengjulia a6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT wongeetsin 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT szostakjustyna 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT titzbjoern 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT leetom 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT wongsinkei 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT lavrynenkooksana 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT mergceline 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT corciulomaica 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT simicevicjovan 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT aubersonmehdi 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT pericdariusz 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT dulizeremi 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT bornanddavid 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT lohguojie 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT leekyeongheemonica 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT zhangjingjie 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT millerjohnh 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT schlagewalterk 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT guedjemmanuel 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT schneiderthomas 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT phillipsblaine 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT leroypatrice 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT choukrallahmohamedamin 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT sierronicolas 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT buettneransgar 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT xiangyang 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT kuczajarkadiusz 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT ivanovnikolaiv 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT luettichkarsta 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT vanscheeuwijckpatrick 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT peitschmanuelc 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract AT hoengjulia 6monthinhalationtoxicologystudyinapoemicedemonstratessubstantiallylowereffectsofevaporaerosolcomparedwithcigarettesmokeintherespiratorytract |