Cargando…

A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block

Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anaesthetic with a rapid onset of action and an anaesthesia duration up to 60 min. In this pivotal study success rates, onset and remission of motor and sensory block and safety of chloroprocaine 2% was compared to ropivacaine 0.75% for short-duration distal up...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sulyok, Irene, Camponovo, Claudio, Zotti, Oliver, Haslik, Werner, Köstenberger, Markus, Likar, Rudolf, Leuratti, Chiara, Donati, Elisabetta, Kimberger, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89483-y
_version_ 1783690815345786880
author Sulyok, Irene
Camponovo, Claudio
Zotti, Oliver
Haslik, Werner
Köstenberger, Markus
Likar, Rudolf
Leuratti, Chiara
Donati, Elisabetta
Kimberger, Oliver
author_facet Sulyok, Irene
Camponovo, Claudio
Zotti, Oliver
Haslik, Werner
Köstenberger, Markus
Likar, Rudolf
Leuratti, Chiara
Donati, Elisabetta
Kimberger, Oliver
author_sort Sulyok, Irene
collection PubMed
description Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anaesthetic with a rapid onset of action and an anaesthesia duration up to 60 min. In this pivotal study success rates, onset and remission of motor and sensory block and safety of chloroprocaine 2% was compared to ropivacaine 0.75% for short-duration distal upper limb surgery with successful block rates as primary outcome. The study was designed as a prospective, randomised, multi-centre, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, performed in 4 European hospitals with 211 patients scheduled for short duration distal upper limb surgery under axillary plexus block anaesthesia. Patients received either ultrasound guided axillary block with 20 ml chloroprocaine 2%, or with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75%. Successful block was defined as block without any supplementation in the first 45 min calculated from the time of readiness for surgery. 90.8% patients achieved a successful block with chloroprocaine 2% and 92.9% patients with Ropivacaine 0.75%, thus non-inferiority was demonstrated (10% non inferiority margin; 95% CI − 0.097, 0.039; p = 0.02). Time to onset of block was not significantly different between the groups. Median time to motor and sensory block regression was significantly shorter as was time to home discharge (164 [155–170] min for chloroprocaine versus 380 [209–450] for the ropivacaine group, p < 0.001). For short-duration surgical procedures, the short-acting Chloroprocaine 2% may be used, with success rates non-inferior to ropivacaine and a favourable safety profile. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT02385097 (March 11th, 2015) and European Clinical Trial Database with the EudraCT number 2014-002519-40 (July 7th, 2015, Austria—BASG).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8113228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81132282021-05-12 A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block Sulyok, Irene Camponovo, Claudio Zotti, Oliver Haslik, Werner Köstenberger, Markus Likar, Rudolf Leuratti, Chiara Donati, Elisabetta Kimberger, Oliver Sci Rep Article Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anaesthetic with a rapid onset of action and an anaesthesia duration up to 60 min. In this pivotal study success rates, onset and remission of motor and sensory block and safety of chloroprocaine 2% was compared to ropivacaine 0.75% for short-duration distal upper limb surgery with successful block rates as primary outcome. The study was designed as a prospective, randomised, multi-centre, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, performed in 4 European hospitals with 211 patients scheduled for short duration distal upper limb surgery under axillary plexus block anaesthesia. Patients received either ultrasound guided axillary block with 20 ml chloroprocaine 2%, or with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75%. Successful block was defined as block without any supplementation in the first 45 min calculated from the time of readiness for surgery. 90.8% patients achieved a successful block with chloroprocaine 2% and 92.9% patients with Ropivacaine 0.75%, thus non-inferiority was demonstrated (10% non inferiority margin; 95% CI − 0.097, 0.039; p = 0.02). Time to onset of block was not significantly different between the groups. Median time to motor and sensory block regression was significantly shorter as was time to home discharge (164 [155–170] min for chloroprocaine versus 380 [209–450] for the ropivacaine group, p < 0.001). For short-duration surgical procedures, the short-acting Chloroprocaine 2% may be used, with success rates non-inferior to ropivacaine and a favourable safety profile. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT02385097 (March 11th, 2015) and European Clinical Trial Database with the EudraCT number 2014-002519-40 (July 7th, 2015, Austria—BASG). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8113228/ /pubmed/33976374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89483-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sulyok, Irene
Camponovo, Claudio
Zotti, Oliver
Haslik, Werner
Köstenberger, Markus
Likar, Rudolf
Leuratti, Chiara
Donati, Elisabetta
Kimberger, Oliver
A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
title A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
title_full A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
title_fullStr A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
title_full_unstemmed A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
title_short A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
title_sort randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89483-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sulyokirene arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT camponovoclaudio arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT zottioliver arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT haslikwerner arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT kostenbergermarkus arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT likarrudolf arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT leurattichiara arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT donatielisabetta arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT kimbergeroliver arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT sulyokirene randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT camponovoclaudio randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT zottioliver randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT haslikwerner randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT kostenbergermarkus randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT likarrudolf randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT leurattichiara randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT donatielisabetta randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock
AT kimbergeroliver randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock