Cargando…
A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block
Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anaesthetic with a rapid onset of action and an anaesthesia duration up to 60 min. In this pivotal study success rates, onset and remission of motor and sensory block and safety of chloroprocaine 2% was compared to ropivacaine 0.75% for short-duration distal up...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89483-y |
_version_ | 1783690815345786880 |
---|---|
author | Sulyok, Irene Camponovo, Claudio Zotti, Oliver Haslik, Werner Köstenberger, Markus Likar, Rudolf Leuratti, Chiara Donati, Elisabetta Kimberger, Oliver |
author_facet | Sulyok, Irene Camponovo, Claudio Zotti, Oliver Haslik, Werner Köstenberger, Markus Likar, Rudolf Leuratti, Chiara Donati, Elisabetta Kimberger, Oliver |
author_sort | Sulyok, Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anaesthetic with a rapid onset of action and an anaesthesia duration up to 60 min. In this pivotal study success rates, onset and remission of motor and sensory block and safety of chloroprocaine 2% was compared to ropivacaine 0.75% for short-duration distal upper limb surgery with successful block rates as primary outcome. The study was designed as a prospective, randomised, multi-centre, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, performed in 4 European hospitals with 211 patients scheduled for short duration distal upper limb surgery under axillary plexus block anaesthesia. Patients received either ultrasound guided axillary block with 20 ml chloroprocaine 2%, or with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75%. Successful block was defined as block without any supplementation in the first 45 min calculated from the time of readiness for surgery. 90.8% patients achieved a successful block with chloroprocaine 2% and 92.9% patients with Ropivacaine 0.75%, thus non-inferiority was demonstrated (10% non inferiority margin; 95% CI − 0.097, 0.039; p = 0.02). Time to onset of block was not significantly different between the groups. Median time to motor and sensory block regression was significantly shorter as was time to home discharge (164 [155–170] min for chloroprocaine versus 380 [209–450] for the ropivacaine group, p < 0.001). For short-duration surgical procedures, the short-acting Chloroprocaine 2% may be used, with success rates non-inferior to ropivacaine and a favourable safety profile. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT02385097 (March 11th, 2015) and European Clinical Trial Database with the EudraCT number 2014-002519-40 (July 7th, 2015, Austria—BASG). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8113228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81132282021-05-12 A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block Sulyok, Irene Camponovo, Claudio Zotti, Oliver Haslik, Werner Köstenberger, Markus Likar, Rudolf Leuratti, Chiara Donati, Elisabetta Kimberger, Oliver Sci Rep Article Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anaesthetic with a rapid onset of action and an anaesthesia duration up to 60 min. In this pivotal study success rates, onset and remission of motor and sensory block and safety of chloroprocaine 2% was compared to ropivacaine 0.75% for short-duration distal upper limb surgery with successful block rates as primary outcome. The study was designed as a prospective, randomised, multi-centre, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, performed in 4 European hospitals with 211 patients scheduled for short duration distal upper limb surgery under axillary plexus block anaesthesia. Patients received either ultrasound guided axillary block with 20 ml chloroprocaine 2%, or with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75%. Successful block was defined as block without any supplementation in the first 45 min calculated from the time of readiness for surgery. 90.8% patients achieved a successful block with chloroprocaine 2% and 92.9% patients with Ropivacaine 0.75%, thus non-inferiority was demonstrated (10% non inferiority margin; 95% CI − 0.097, 0.039; p = 0.02). Time to onset of block was not significantly different between the groups. Median time to motor and sensory block regression was significantly shorter as was time to home discharge (164 [155–170] min for chloroprocaine versus 380 [209–450] for the ropivacaine group, p < 0.001). For short-duration surgical procedures, the short-acting Chloroprocaine 2% may be used, with success rates non-inferior to ropivacaine and a favourable safety profile. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT02385097 (March 11th, 2015) and European Clinical Trial Database with the EudraCT number 2014-002519-40 (July 7th, 2015, Austria—BASG). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8113228/ /pubmed/33976374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89483-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Sulyok, Irene Camponovo, Claudio Zotti, Oliver Haslik, Werner Köstenberger, Markus Likar, Rudolf Leuratti, Chiara Donati, Elisabetta Kimberger, Oliver A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block |
title | A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block |
title_full | A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block |
title_fullStr | A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block |
title_short | A randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block |
title_sort | randomised, non-inferiority study of chloroprocaine 2% and ropivacaine 0.75% in ultrasound-guided axillary block |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89483-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sulyokirene arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT camponovoclaudio arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT zottioliver arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT haslikwerner arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT kostenbergermarkus arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT likarrudolf arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT leurattichiara arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT donatielisabetta arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT kimbergeroliver arandomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT sulyokirene randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT camponovoclaudio randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT zottioliver randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT haslikwerner randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT kostenbergermarkus randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT likarrudolf randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT leurattichiara randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT donatielisabetta randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock AT kimbergeroliver randomisednoninferioritystudyofchloroprocaine2andropivacaine075inultrasoundguidedaxillaryblock |