Cargando…
Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring
AIMS: Perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) has emerged as a novel coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)–based biomarker predicting cardiovascular outcomes by capturing early coronary inflammation. It is currently unknown whether FAI adds prognostic value beyond that provided by single-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33200300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05106-0 |
_version_ | 1783690834490687488 |
---|---|
author | Bengs, Susan Haider, Ahmed Warnock, Geoffrey I. Fiechter, Michael Pargaetzi, Yves Rampidis, Georgios Etter, Dominik Wijnen, Winandus J. Portmann, Angela Osto, Elena Treyer, Valerie Benz, Dominik C. Meisel, Alexander Fuchs, Tobias A. Gräni, Christoph Buechel, Ronny R. Kaufmann, Philipp A. Pazhenkottil, Aju P. Gebhard, Catherine |
author_facet | Bengs, Susan Haider, Ahmed Warnock, Geoffrey I. Fiechter, Michael Pargaetzi, Yves Rampidis, Georgios Etter, Dominik Wijnen, Winandus J. Portmann, Angela Osto, Elena Treyer, Valerie Benz, Dominik C. Meisel, Alexander Fuchs, Tobias A. Gräni, Christoph Buechel, Ronny R. Kaufmann, Philipp A. Pazhenkottil, Aju P. Gebhard, Catherine |
author_sort | Bengs, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) has emerged as a novel coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)–based biomarker predicting cardiovascular outcomes by capturing early coronary inflammation. It is currently unknown whether FAI adds prognostic value beyond that provided by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) and CCTA findings including coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 492 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 10.8 years) underwent clinically indicated multimodality CCTA and electrocardiography (ECG)-gated (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT-MPI between May 2005 and December 2008 at our institution, and follow-up data on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was obtained for 314 patients. FAI was obtained from CCTA images and was measured around the right coronary artery (FAI[RCA]), the left anterior descending artery (FAI[LAD]), and the left main coronary artery (FAI[LMCA]). During a median follow-up of 2.7 years, FAI[RCA] > − 70.1 was associated with an increased rate of MACE (log rank p = 0.049), while no such association was seen for FAI[LAD] or FAI[LMCA] (p = NS). A multivariate Cox regression model accounting for cardiovascular risk factors, CCTA and SPECT-MPI findings identified FAI[RCA] as an independent predictor of MACE (HR 2.733, 95% CI: 1.220–6.123, p = 0.015). However, FAI[RCA] was no longer a significant predictor of MACE after adding CACS (p = 0.279). A first-order interaction term consisting of sex and FAI[RCA] was significant in both models (HR 2.119, 95% CI: 1.218–3.686, p = 0.008; and HR 2.071, 95% CI: 1.111–3.861, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: FAI does not add incremental prognostic value beyond multimodality MPI/CCTA findings including CACS. The diagnostic value of FAI[RCA] is significantly biased by sex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8113311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81133112021-05-13 Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring Bengs, Susan Haider, Ahmed Warnock, Geoffrey I. Fiechter, Michael Pargaetzi, Yves Rampidis, Georgios Etter, Dominik Wijnen, Winandus J. Portmann, Angela Osto, Elena Treyer, Valerie Benz, Dominik C. Meisel, Alexander Fuchs, Tobias A. Gräni, Christoph Buechel, Ronny R. Kaufmann, Philipp A. Pazhenkottil, Aju P. Gebhard, Catherine Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Short Communication AIMS: Perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) has emerged as a novel coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)–based biomarker predicting cardiovascular outcomes by capturing early coronary inflammation. It is currently unknown whether FAI adds prognostic value beyond that provided by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) and CCTA findings including coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 492 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 10.8 years) underwent clinically indicated multimodality CCTA and electrocardiography (ECG)-gated (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT-MPI between May 2005 and December 2008 at our institution, and follow-up data on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was obtained for 314 patients. FAI was obtained from CCTA images and was measured around the right coronary artery (FAI[RCA]), the left anterior descending artery (FAI[LAD]), and the left main coronary artery (FAI[LMCA]). During a median follow-up of 2.7 years, FAI[RCA] > − 70.1 was associated with an increased rate of MACE (log rank p = 0.049), while no such association was seen for FAI[LAD] or FAI[LMCA] (p = NS). A multivariate Cox regression model accounting for cardiovascular risk factors, CCTA and SPECT-MPI findings identified FAI[RCA] as an independent predictor of MACE (HR 2.733, 95% CI: 1.220–6.123, p = 0.015). However, FAI[RCA] was no longer a significant predictor of MACE after adding CACS (p = 0.279). A first-order interaction term consisting of sex and FAI[RCA] was significant in both models (HR 2.119, 95% CI: 1.218–3.686, p = 0.008; and HR 2.071, 95% CI: 1.111–3.861, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: FAI does not add incremental prognostic value beyond multimodality MPI/CCTA findings including CACS. The diagnostic value of FAI[RCA] is significantly biased by sex. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8113311/ /pubmed/33200300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05106-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Bengs, Susan Haider, Ahmed Warnock, Geoffrey I. Fiechter, Michael Pargaetzi, Yves Rampidis, Georgios Etter, Dominik Wijnen, Winandus J. Portmann, Angela Osto, Elena Treyer, Valerie Benz, Dominik C. Meisel, Alexander Fuchs, Tobias A. Gräni, Christoph Buechel, Ronny R. Kaufmann, Philipp A. Pazhenkottil, Aju P. Gebhard, Catherine Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring |
title | Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring |
title_full | Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring |
title_fullStr | Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring |
title_short | Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring |
title_sort | quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33200300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05106-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bengssusan quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT haiderahmed quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT warnockgeoffreyi quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT fiechtermichael quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT pargaetziyves quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT rampidisgeorgios quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT etterdominik quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT wijnenwinandusj quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT portmannangela quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT ostoelena quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT treyervalerie quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT benzdominikc quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT meiselalexander quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT fuchstobiasa quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT granichristoph quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT buechelronnyr quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT kaufmannphilippa quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT pazhenkottilajup quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring AT gebhardcatherine quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring |