Cargando…

Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring

AIMS: Perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) has emerged as a novel coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)–based biomarker predicting cardiovascular outcomes by capturing early coronary inflammation. It is currently unknown whether FAI adds prognostic value beyond that provided by single-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bengs, Susan, Haider, Ahmed, Warnock, Geoffrey I., Fiechter, Michael, Pargaetzi, Yves, Rampidis, Georgios, Etter, Dominik, Wijnen, Winandus J., Portmann, Angela, Osto, Elena, Treyer, Valerie, Benz, Dominik C., Meisel, Alexander, Fuchs, Tobias A., Gräni, Christoph, Buechel, Ronny R., Kaufmann, Philipp A., Pazhenkottil, Aju P., Gebhard, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33200300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05106-0
_version_ 1783690834490687488
author Bengs, Susan
Haider, Ahmed
Warnock, Geoffrey I.
Fiechter, Michael
Pargaetzi, Yves
Rampidis, Georgios
Etter, Dominik
Wijnen, Winandus J.
Portmann, Angela
Osto, Elena
Treyer, Valerie
Benz, Dominik C.
Meisel, Alexander
Fuchs, Tobias A.
Gräni, Christoph
Buechel, Ronny R.
Kaufmann, Philipp A.
Pazhenkottil, Aju P.
Gebhard, Catherine
author_facet Bengs, Susan
Haider, Ahmed
Warnock, Geoffrey I.
Fiechter, Michael
Pargaetzi, Yves
Rampidis, Georgios
Etter, Dominik
Wijnen, Winandus J.
Portmann, Angela
Osto, Elena
Treyer, Valerie
Benz, Dominik C.
Meisel, Alexander
Fuchs, Tobias A.
Gräni, Christoph
Buechel, Ronny R.
Kaufmann, Philipp A.
Pazhenkottil, Aju P.
Gebhard, Catherine
author_sort Bengs, Susan
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) has emerged as a novel coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)–based biomarker predicting cardiovascular outcomes by capturing early coronary inflammation. It is currently unknown whether FAI adds prognostic value beyond that provided by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) and CCTA findings including coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 492 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 10.8 years) underwent clinically indicated multimodality CCTA and electrocardiography (ECG)-gated (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT-MPI between May 2005 and December 2008 at our institution, and follow-up data on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was obtained for 314 patients. FAI was obtained from CCTA images and was measured around the right coronary artery (FAI[RCA]), the left anterior descending artery (FAI[LAD]), and the left main coronary artery (FAI[LMCA]). During a median follow-up of 2.7 years, FAI[RCA] > − 70.1 was associated with an increased rate of MACE (log rank p = 0.049), while no such association was seen for FAI[LAD] or FAI[LMCA] (p = NS). A multivariate Cox regression model accounting for cardiovascular risk factors, CCTA and SPECT-MPI findings identified FAI[RCA] as an independent predictor of MACE (HR 2.733, 95% CI: 1.220–6.123, p = 0.015). However, FAI[RCA] was no longer a significant predictor of MACE after adding CACS (p = 0.279). A first-order interaction term consisting of sex and FAI[RCA] was significant in both models (HR 2.119, 95% CI: 1.218–3.686, p = 0.008; and HR 2.071, 95% CI: 1.111–3.861, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: FAI does not add incremental prognostic value beyond multimodality MPI/CCTA findings including CACS. The diagnostic value of FAI[RCA] is significantly biased by sex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8113311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81133112021-05-13 Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring Bengs, Susan Haider, Ahmed Warnock, Geoffrey I. Fiechter, Michael Pargaetzi, Yves Rampidis, Georgios Etter, Dominik Wijnen, Winandus J. Portmann, Angela Osto, Elena Treyer, Valerie Benz, Dominik C. Meisel, Alexander Fuchs, Tobias A. Gräni, Christoph Buechel, Ronny R. Kaufmann, Philipp A. Pazhenkottil, Aju P. Gebhard, Catherine Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Short Communication AIMS: Perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) has emerged as a novel coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)–based biomarker predicting cardiovascular outcomes by capturing early coronary inflammation. It is currently unknown whether FAI adds prognostic value beyond that provided by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) and CCTA findings including coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 492 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 10.8 years) underwent clinically indicated multimodality CCTA and electrocardiography (ECG)-gated (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT-MPI between May 2005 and December 2008 at our institution, and follow-up data on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was obtained for 314 patients. FAI was obtained from CCTA images and was measured around the right coronary artery (FAI[RCA]), the left anterior descending artery (FAI[LAD]), and the left main coronary artery (FAI[LMCA]). During a median follow-up of 2.7 years, FAI[RCA] > − 70.1 was associated with an increased rate of MACE (log rank p = 0.049), while no such association was seen for FAI[LAD] or FAI[LMCA] (p = NS). A multivariate Cox regression model accounting for cardiovascular risk factors, CCTA and SPECT-MPI findings identified FAI[RCA] as an independent predictor of MACE (HR 2.733, 95% CI: 1.220–6.123, p = 0.015). However, FAI[RCA] was no longer a significant predictor of MACE after adding CACS (p = 0.279). A first-order interaction term consisting of sex and FAI[RCA] was significant in both models (HR 2.119, 95% CI: 1.218–3.686, p = 0.008; and HR 2.071, 95% CI: 1.111–3.861, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: FAI does not add incremental prognostic value beyond multimodality MPI/CCTA findings including CACS. The diagnostic value of FAI[RCA] is significantly biased by sex. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-11-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8113311/ /pubmed/33200300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05106-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Short Communication
Bengs, Susan
Haider, Ahmed
Warnock, Geoffrey I.
Fiechter, Michael
Pargaetzi, Yves
Rampidis, Georgios
Etter, Dominik
Wijnen, Winandus J.
Portmann, Angela
Osto, Elena
Treyer, Valerie
Benz, Dominik C.
Meisel, Alexander
Fuchs, Tobias A.
Gräni, Christoph
Buechel, Ronny R.
Kaufmann, Philipp A.
Pazhenkottil, Aju P.
Gebhard, Catherine
Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring
title Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring
title_full Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring
title_fullStr Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring
title_short Quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring
title_sort quantification of perivascular inflammation does not provide incremental prognostic value over myocardial perfusion imaging and calcium scoring
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33200300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05106-0
work_keys_str_mv AT bengssusan quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT haiderahmed quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT warnockgeoffreyi quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT fiechtermichael quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT pargaetziyves quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT rampidisgeorgios quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT etterdominik quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT wijnenwinandusj quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT portmannangela quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT ostoelena quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT treyervalerie quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT benzdominikc quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT meiselalexander quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT fuchstobiasa quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT granichristoph quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT buechelronnyr quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT kaufmannphilippa quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT pazhenkottilajup quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring
AT gebhardcatherine quantificationofperivascularinflammationdoesnotprovideincrementalprognosticvalueovermyocardialperfusionimagingandcalciumscoring