Cargando…
Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and test an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to improve the quality of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images. METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained by using pairs of excellent (acquisitio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00788-5 |
_version_ | 1783690857843523584 |
---|---|
author | Ly, John Minarik, David Jögi, Jonas Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin |
author_facet | Ly, John Minarik, David Jögi, Jonas Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin |
author_sort | Ly, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and test an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to improve the quality of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images. METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained by using pairs of excellent (acquisition time of 6 min/bed position) and standard (acquisition time of 1.5 min/bed position) or sub-standard (acquisition time of 1 min/bed position) images from 72 patients. A test group of 25 patients was used to validate the CNN qualitatively and quantitatively with 5 different image sets per patient: 4 min/bed position, 1.5 min/bed position with and without CNN, and 1 min/bed position with and without CNN. RESULTS: Difference in hotspot maximum or peak standardized uptake value between the standard 1.5 min and 1.5 min CNN images fell short of significance. Coefficient of variation, the noise level, was lower in the CNN-enhanced images compared with standard 1 min and 1.5 min images. Physicians ranked the 1.5 min CNN and the 4 min images highest regarding image quality (noise and contrast) and the standard 1 min images lowest. CONCLUSIONS: AI can enhance [(18)F]FDG-PET images to reduce noise and increase contrast compared with standard images whilst keeping SUV(max/peak) stability. There were significant differences in scoring between the 1.5 min and 1.5 min CNN image sets in all comparisons, the latter had higher scores in noise and contrast. Furthermore, difference in SUV(max) and SUV(peak) fell short of significance for that pair. The improved image quality can potentially be used either to provide better images to the nuclear medicine physicians or to reduce acquisition time/administered activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8113431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81134312021-05-13 Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network Ly, John Minarik, David Jögi, Jonas Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and test an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to improve the quality of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images. METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained by using pairs of excellent (acquisition time of 6 min/bed position) and standard (acquisition time of 1.5 min/bed position) or sub-standard (acquisition time of 1 min/bed position) images from 72 patients. A test group of 25 patients was used to validate the CNN qualitatively and quantitatively with 5 different image sets per patient: 4 min/bed position, 1.5 min/bed position with and without CNN, and 1 min/bed position with and without CNN. RESULTS: Difference in hotspot maximum or peak standardized uptake value between the standard 1.5 min and 1.5 min CNN images fell short of significance. Coefficient of variation, the noise level, was lower in the CNN-enhanced images compared with standard 1 min and 1.5 min images. Physicians ranked the 1.5 min CNN and the 4 min images highest regarding image quality (noise and contrast) and the standard 1 min images lowest. CONCLUSIONS: AI can enhance [(18)F]FDG-PET images to reduce noise and increase contrast compared with standard images whilst keeping SUV(max/peak) stability. There were significant differences in scoring between the 1.5 min and 1.5 min CNN image sets in all comparisons, the latter had higher scores in noise and contrast. Furthermore, difference in SUV(max) and SUV(peak) fell short of significance for that pair. The improved image quality can potentially be used either to provide better images to the nuclear medicine physicians or to reduce acquisition time/administered activity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8113431/ /pubmed/33974171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00788-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ly, John Minarik, David Jögi, Jonas Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network |
title | Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network |
title_full | Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network |
title_fullStr | Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network |
title_short | Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network |
title_sort | post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)f]fdg pet images with a convolutional neural network |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00788-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lyjohn postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT minarikdavid postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT jogijonas postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT wollmerper postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork AT tragardhelin postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork |