Cargando…

Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and test an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to improve the quality of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images. METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained by using pairs of excellent (acquisitio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ly, John, Minarik, David, Jögi, Jonas, Wollmer, Per, Trägårdh, Elin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00788-5
_version_ 1783690857843523584
author Ly, John
Minarik, David
Jögi, Jonas
Wollmer, Per
Trägårdh, Elin
author_facet Ly, John
Minarik, David
Jögi, Jonas
Wollmer, Per
Trägårdh, Elin
author_sort Ly, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and test an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to improve the quality of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images. METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained by using pairs of excellent (acquisition time of 6 min/bed position) and standard (acquisition time of 1.5 min/bed position) or sub-standard (acquisition time of 1 min/bed position) images from 72 patients. A test group of 25 patients was used to validate the CNN qualitatively and quantitatively with 5 different image sets per patient: 4 min/bed position, 1.5 min/bed position with and without CNN, and 1 min/bed position with and without CNN. RESULTS: Difference in hotspot maximum or peak standardized uptake value between the standard 1.5 min and 1.5 min CNN images fell short of significance. Coefficient of variation, the noise level, was lower in the CNN-enhanced images compared with standard 1 min and 1.5 min images. Physicians ranked the 1.5 min CNN and the 4 min images highest regarding image quality (noise and contrast) and the standard 1 min images lowest. CONCLUSIONS: AI can enhance [(18)F]FDG-PET images to reduce noise and increase contrast compared with standard images whilst keeping SUV(max/peak) stability. There were significant differences in scoring between the 1.5 min and 1.5 min CNN image sets in all comparisons, the latter had higher scores in noise and contrast. Furthermore, difference in SUV(max) and SUV(peak) fell short of significance for that pair. The improved image quality can potentially be used either to provide better images to the nuclear medicine physicians or to reduce acquisition time/administered activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8113431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81134312021-05-13 Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network Ly, John Minarik, David Jögi, Jonas Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to develop and test an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method to improve the quality of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images. METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained by using pairs of excellent (acquisition time of 6 min/bed position) and standard (acquisition time of 1.5 min/bed position) or sub-standard (acquisition time of 1 min/bed position) images from 72 patients. A test group of 25 patients was used to validate the CNN qualitatively and quantitatively with 5 different image sets per patient: 4 min/bed position, 1.5 min/bed position with and without CNN, and 1 min/bed position with and without CNN. RESULTS: Difference in hotspot maximum or peak standardized uptake value between the standard 1.5 min and 1.5 min CNN images fell short of significance. Coefficient of variation, the noise level, was lower in the CNN-enhanced images compared with standard 1 min and 1.5 min images. Physicians ranked the 1.5 min CNN and the 4 min images highest regarding image quality (noise and contrast) and the standard 1 min images lowest. CONCLUSIONS: AI can enhance [(18)F]FDG-PET images to reduce noise and increase contrast compared with standard images whilst keeping SUV(max/peak) stability. There were significant differences in scoring between the 1.5 min and 1.5 min CNN image sets in all comparisons, the latter had higher scores in noise and contrast. Furthermore, difference in SUV(max) and SUV(peak) fell short of significance for that pair. The improved image quality can potentially be used either to provide better images to the nuclear medicine physicians or to reduce acquisition time/administered activity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8113431/ /pubmed/33974171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00788-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Ly, John
Minarik, David
Jögi, Jonas
Wollmer, Per
Trägårdh, Elin
Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network
title Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network
title_full Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network
title_fullStr Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network
title_full_unstemmed Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network
title_short Post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)F]FDG PET images with a convolutional neural network
title_sort post-reconstruction enhancement of [(18)f]fdg pet images with a convolutional neural network
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00788-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lyjohn postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT minarikdavid postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT jogijonas postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT wollmerper postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork
AT tragardhelin postreconstructionenhancementof18ffdgpetimageswithaconvolutionalneuralnetwork