Cargando…

Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses

Collection of biological samples for DNA is necessary in a variety of disciplines including disease epidemiology, landscape genetics, and forensics. Quantity and quality of DNA varies depending on the method of collection or media available for collection (e.g., blood, tissue, fecal). Blood is the m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edson, Jessie, Brown, Justin, Miller, William L., Walter, W. David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89390-2
_version_ 1783690863026634752
author Edson, Jessie
Brown, Justin
Miller, William L.
Walter, W. David
author_facet Edson, Jessie
Brown, Justin
Miller, William L.
Walter, W. David
author_sort Edson, Jessie
collection PubMed
description Collection of biological samples for DNA is necessary in a variety of disciplines including disease epidemiology, landscape genetics, and forensics. Quantity and quality of DNA varies depending on the method of collection or media available for collection (e.g., blood, tissue, fecal). Blood is the most common sample collected in vials or on Whatman Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards with short- and long-term storage providing adequate DNA for study objectives. The focus of this study was to determine if biological samples stored on Whatman FTA Elute cards were a reasonable alternative to traditional DNA sample collection, storage, and extraction. Tissue, nasal swabs, and ocular fluid were collected from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Tissue samples and nasal swabs acted as a control to compare extraction and DNA suitability for microsatellite analysis for nasal swabs and ocular fluid extracted from FTA Elute cards. We determined that FTA Elute cards improved the extraction time and storage of samples and that nasal swabs and ocular fluid containing pigmented fluid were reasonable alternatives to traditional tissue DNA extractions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8113455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81134552021-05-12 Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses Edson, Jessie Brown, Justin Miller, William L. Walter, W. David Sci Rep Article Collection of biological samples for DNA is necessary in a variety of disciplines including disease epidemiology, landscape genetics, and forensics. Quantity and quality of DNA varies depending on the method of collection or media available for collection (e.g., blood, tissue, fecal). Blood is the most common sample collected in vials or on Whatman Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards with short- and long-term storage providing adequate DNA for study objectives. The focus of this study was to determine if biological samples stored on Whatman FTA Elute cards were a reasonable alternative to traditional DNA sample collection, storage, and extraction. Tissue, nasal swabs, and ocular fluid were collected from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Tissue samples and nasal swabs acted as a control to compare extraction and DNA suitability for microsatellite analysis for nasal swabs and ocular fluid extracted from FTA Elute cards. We determined that FTA Elute cards improved the extraction time and storage of samples and that nasal swabs and ocular fluid containing pigmented fluid were reasonable alternatives to traditional tissue DNA extractions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8113455/ /pubmed/33976279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89390-2 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Edson, Jessie
Brown, Justin
Miller, William L.
Walter, W. David
Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses
title Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses
title_full Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses
title_fullStr Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses
title_short Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses
title_sort comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (odocoileus virginianus) for dna extraction and analyses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976279
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89390-2
work_keys_str_mv AT edsonjessie comparisonofsampletypesfromwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusfordnaextractionandanalyses
AT brownjustin comparisonofsampletypesfromwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusfordnaextractionandanalyses
AT millerwilliaml comparisonofsampletypesfromwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusfordnaextractionandanalyses
AT walterwdavid comparisonofsampletypesfromwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusfordnaextractionandanalyses