Cargando…
Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses
Collection of biological samples for DNA is necessary in a variety of disciplines including disease epidemiology, landscape genetics, and forensics. Quantity and quality of DNA varies depending on the method of collection or media available for collection (e.g., blood, tissue, fecal). Blood is the m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89390-2 |
_version_ | 1783690863026634752 |
---|---|
author | Edson, Jessie Brown, Justin Miller, William L. Walter, W. David |
author_facet | Edson, Jessie Brown, Justin Miller, William L. Walter, W. David |
author_sort | Edson, Jessie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Collection of biological samples for DNA is necessary in a variety of disciplines including disease epidemiology, landscape genetics, and forensics. Quantity and quality of DNA varies depending on the method of collection or media available for collection (e.g., blood, tissue, fecal). Blood is the most common sample collected in vials or on Whatman Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards with short- and long-term storage providing adequate DNA for study objectives. The focus of this study was to determine if biological samples stored on Whatman FTA Elute cards were a reasonable alternative to traditional DNA sample collection, storage, and extraction. Tissue, nasal swabs, and ocular fluid were collected from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Tissue samples and nasal swabs acted as a control to compare extraction and DNA suitability for microsatellite analysis for nasal swabs and ocular fluid extracted from FTA Elute cards. We determined that FTA Elute cards improved the extraction time and storage of samples and that nasal swabs and ocular fluid containing pigmented fluid were reasonable alternatives to traditional tissue DNA extractions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8113455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81134552021-05-12 Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses Edson, Jessie Brown, Justin Miller, William L. Walter, W. David Sci Rep Article Collection of biological samples for DNA is necessary in a variety of disciplines including disease epidemiology, landscape genetics, and forensics. Quantity and quality of DNA varies depending on the method of collection or media available for collection (e.g., blood, tissue, fecal). Blood is the most common sample collected in vials or on Whatman Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards with short- and long-term storage providing adequate DNA for study objectives. The focus of this study was to determine if biological samples stored on Whatman FTA Elute cards were a reasonable alternative to traditional DNA sample collection, storage, and extraction. Tissue, nasal swabs, and ocular fluid were collected from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Tissue samples and nasal swabs acted as a control to compare extraction and DNA suitability for microsatellite analysis for nasal swabs and ocular fluid extracted from FTA Elute cards. We determined that FTA Elute cards improved the extraction time and storage of samples and that nasal swabs and ocular fluid containing pigmented fluid were reasonable alternatives to traditional tissue DNA extractions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8113455/ /pubmed/33976279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89390-2 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Edson, Jessie Brown, Justin Miller, William L. Walter, W. David Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses |
title | Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses |
title_full | Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses |
title_fullStr | Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses |
title_short | Comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) for DNA extraction and analyses |
title_sort | comparison of sample types from white-tailed deer (odocoileus virginianus) for dna extraction and analyses |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33976279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89390-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edsonjessie comparisonofsampletypesfromwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusfordnaextractionandanalyses AT brownjustin comparisonofsampletypesfromwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusfordnaextractionandanalyses AT millerwilliaml comparisonofsampletypesfromwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusfordnaextractionandanalyses AT walterwdavid comparisonofsampletypesfromwhitetaileddeerodocoileusvirginianusfordnaextractionandanalyses |