Cargando…

Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)

Research with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) involves specific ethical challenges, which should be addressed in the informed consent process. Up to now, little concern has been paid to the practice of information in iPSC-clinical studies. In order to fill this research gap, we have searched...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orzechowski, Marcin, Schochow, Maximilian, Kühl, Michael, Steger, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33996790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.627816
_version_ 1783690928135864320
author Orzechowski, Marcin
Schochow, Maximilian
Kühl, Michael
Steger, Florian
author_facet Orzechowski, Marcin
Schochow, Maximilian
Kühl, Michael
Steger, Florian
author_sort Orzechowski, Marcin
collection PubMed
description Research with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) involves specific ethical challenges, which should be addressed in the informed consent process. Up to now, little concern has been paid to the practice of information in iPSC-clinical studies. In order to fill this research gap, we have searched the documentation of the Research Ethics Committee at Ulm University from the years 2007 to 2019. In our previous research, we have identified 11 items for evaluation of the process of information in iPSC research. We used these items to analyze content and form of information provided for participants in the iPSC studies conducted at Ulm University and Ulm University Hospital in Germany. All analyzed studies provide general information regarding the study’s aim, method, and collection of donor’s personal data and specimen. The information for participants in these studies adheres to general guidelines for research involving human subjects; however, in several areas fails to take into account the specific nature of research with iPSCs. The majority of analyzed studies fail to provide information about possible individual consequences connected with genetic research, such as the possibility of re-identification of the donor or incidental findings acquired during research. Missing is also information about the possibility of future studies involving reproductive research or transplantation of cells and organs. The donor information process in all analyzed studies is conducted in form of the information sheet and oral information. The results of our research show that the process of informed consent in iPSC research should be updated as new developments emerge in this area. However, comprehension of information should not be jeopardized through information overload. Effective communication of essential information requires improved information methods tailored to the needs of participants, such as video animations, interactive consent modules or social media instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8113756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81137562021-05-13 Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) Orzechowski, Marcin Schochow, Maximilian Kühl, Michael Steger, Florian Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Research with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) involves specific ethical challenges, which should be addressed in the informed consent process. Up to now, little concern has been paid to the practice of information in iPSC-clinical studies. In order to fill this research gap, we have searched the documentation of the Research Ethics Committee at Ulm University from the years 2007 to 2019. In our previous research, we have identified 11 items for evaluation of the process of information in iPSC research. We used these items to analyze content and form of information provided for participants in the iPSC studies conducted at Ulm University and Ulm University Hospital in Germany. All analyzed studies provide general information regarding the study’s aim, method, and collection of donor’s personal data and specimen. The information for participants in these studies adheres to general guidelines for research involving human subjects; however, in several areas fails to take into account the specific nature of research with iPSCs. The majority of analyzed studies fail to provide information about possible individual consequences connected with genetic research, such as the possibility of re-identification of the donor or incidental findings acquired during research. Missing is also information about the possibility of future studies involving reproductive research or transplantation of cells and organs. The donor information process in all analyzed studies is conducted in form of the information sheet and oral information. The results of our research show that the process of informed consent in iPSC research should be updated as new developments emerge in this area. However, comprehension of information should not be jeopardized through information overload. Effective communication of essential information requires improved information methods tailored to the needs of participants, such as video animations, interactive consent modules or social media instruments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8113756/ /pubmed/33996790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.627816 Text en Copyright © 2021 Orzechowski, Schochow, Kühl and Steger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Orzechowski, Marcin
Schochow, Maximilian
Kühl, Michael
Steger, Florian
Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)
title Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)
title_full Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)
title_fullStr Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)
title_full_unstemmed Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)
title_short Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)
title_sort content and method of information for participants in clinical studies with induced pluripotent stem cells (ipscs)
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33996790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.627816
work_keys_str_mv AT orzechowskimarcin contentandmethodofinformationforparticipantsinclinicalstudieswithinducedpluripotentstemcellsipscs
AT schochowmaximilian contentandmethodofinformationforparticipantsinclinicalstudieswithinducedpluripotentstemcellsipscs
AT kuhlmichael contentandmethodofinformationforparticipantsinclinicalstudieswithinducedpluripotentstemcellsipscs
AT stegerflorian contentandmethodofinformationforparticipantsinclinicalstudieswithinducedpluripotentstemcellsipscs