Cargando…
Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs)
Research with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) involves specific ethical challenges, which should be addressed in the informed consent process. Up to now, little concern has been paid to the practice of information in iPSC-clinical studies. In order to fill this research gap, we have searched...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33996790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.627816 |
_version_ | 1783690928135864320 |
---|---|
author | Orzechowski, Marcin Schochow, Maximilian Kühl, Michael Steger, Florian |
author_facet | Orzechowski, Marcin Schochow, Maximilian Kühl, Michael Steger, Florian |
author_sort | Orzechowski, Marcin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) involves specific ethical challenges, which should be addressed in the informed consent process. Up to now, little concern has been paid to the practice of information in iPSC-clinical studies. In order to fill this research gap, we have searched the documentation of the Research Ethics Committee at Ulm University from the years 2007 to 2019. In our previous research, we have identified 11 items for evaluation of the process of information in iPSC research. We used these items to analyze content and form of information provided for participants in the iPSC studies conducted at Ulm University and Ulm University Hospital in Germany. All analyzed studies provide general information regarding the study’s aim, method, and collection of donor’s personal data and specimen. The information for participants in these studies adheres to general guidelines for research involving human subjects; however, in several areas fails to take into account the specific nature of research with iPSCs. The majority of analyzed studies fail to provide information about possible individual consequences connected with genetic research, such as the possibility of re-identification of the donor or incidental findings acquired during research. Missing is also information about the possibility of future studies involving reproductive research or transplantation of cells and organs. The donor information process in all analyzed studies is conducted in form of the information sheet and oral information. The results of our research show that the process of informed consent in iPSC research should be updated as new developments emerge in this area. However, comprehension of information should not be jeopardized through information overload. Effective communication of essential information requires improved information methods tailored to the needs of participants, such as video animations, interactive consent modules or social media instruments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8113756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81137562021-05-13 Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) Orzechowski, Marcin Schochow, Maximilian Kühl, Michael Steger, Florian Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Research with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) involves specific ethical challenges, which should be addressed in the informed consent process. Up to now, little concern has been paid to the practice of information in iPSC-clinical studies. In order to fill this research gap, we have searched the documentation of the Research Ethics Committee at Ulm University from the years 2007 to 2019. In our previous research, we have identified 11 items for evaluation of the process of information in iPSC research. We used these items to analyze content and form of information provided for participants in the iPSC studies conducted at Ulm University and Ulm University Hospital in Germany. All analyzed studies provide general information regarding the study’s aim, method, and collection of donor’s personal data and specimen. The information for participants in these studies adheres to general guidelines for research involving human subjects; however, in several areas fails to take into account the specific nature of research with iPSCs. The majority of analyzed studies fail to provide information about possible individual consequences connected with genetic research, such as the possibility of re-identification of the donor or incidental findings acquired during research. Missing is also information about the possibility of future studies involving reproductive research or transplantation of cells and organs. The donor information process in all analyzed studies is conducted in form of the information sheet and oral information. The results of our research show that the process of informed consent in iPSC research should be updated as new developments emerge in this area. However, comprehension of information should not be jeopardized through information overload. Effective communication of essential information requires improved information methods tailored to the needs of participants, such as video animations, interactive consent modules or social media instruments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8113756/ /pubmed/33996790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.627816 Text en Copyright © 2021 Orzechowski, Schochow, Kühl and Steger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cell and Developmental Biology Orzechowski, Marcin Schochow, Maximilian Kühl, Michael Steger, Florian Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) |
title | Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) |
title_full | Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) |
title_fullStr | Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) |
title_full_unstemmed | Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) |
title_short | Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) |
title_sort | content and method of information for participants in clinical studies with induced pluripotent stem cells (ipscs) |
topic | Cell and Developmental Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33996790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.627816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orzechowskimarcin contentandmethodofinformationforparticipantsinclinicalstudieswithinducedpluripotentstemcellsipscs AT schochowmaximilian contentandmethodofinformationforparticipantsinclinicalstudieswithinducedpluripotentstemcellsipscs AT kuhlmichael contentandmethodofinformationforparticipantsinclinicalstudieswithinducedpluripotentstemcellsipscs AT stegerflorian contentandmethodofinformationforparticipantsinclinicalstudieswithinducedpluripotentstemcellsipscs |