Cargando…

A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation

BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and vent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spraider, Patrick, Putzer, Gabriel, Breitkopf, Robert, Abram, Julia, Mathis, Simon, Glodny, Bernhard, Martini, Judith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01365-y
_version_ 1783690935444439040
author Spraider, Patrick
Putzer, Gabriel
Breitkopf, Robert
Abram, Julia
Mathis, Simon
Glodny, Bernhard
Martini, Judith
author_facet Spraider, Patrick
Putzer, Gabriel
Breitkopf, Robert
Abram, Julia
Mathis, Simon
Glodny, Bernhard
Martini, Judith
author_sort Spraider, Patrick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and ventilatory settings compared to conventional ventilation modes. In addition, the constant flow combined with direct intratracheal pressure measurement allows determination of dynamic compliance and ventilation settings can be adjusted accordingly, reflecting a personalized ventilation approach. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year old women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was admitted to a tertiary medical center. Initial ventilation occurred with best standard of care pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and was then switched to FCV, by adopting PCV ventilator settings. This led to an increase in oxygenation by 30 %. Subsequently, to reduce invasiveness of mechanical ventilation, FCV was individualized by dynamic compliance guided adjustment of both, positive end-expiratory pressure and peak pressure; this intervention reduced driving pressure from 18 to 12 cm H(2)O. However, after several hours, compliance further deteriorated which resulted in a tidal volume of only 4.7 ml/kg. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized FCV approach increased oxygenation parameters in a patient suffering from severe COVID-19 related ARDS. Direct intratracheal pressure measurements allow for determination of dynamic compliance and thus optimization of ventilator settings, thereby reducing applied and dissipated energy. However, although desirable, this personalized ventilation strategy may reach its limits when lung function is so severely impaired that patient’s oxygenation has to be ensured at the expense of lung protective ventilation concepts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8113787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81137872021-05-12 A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation Spraider, Patrick Putzer, Gabriel Breitkopf, Robert Abram, Julia Mathis, Simon Glodny, Bernhard Martini, Judith BMC Anesthesiol Case Report BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and ventilatory settings compared to conventional ventilation modes. In addition, the constant flow combined with direct intratracheal pressure measurement allows determination of dynamic compliance and ventilation settings can be adjusted accordingly, reflecting a personalized ventilation approach. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year old women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was admitted to a tertiary medical center. Initial ventilation occurred with best standard of care pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and was then switched to FCV, by adopting PCV ventilator settings. This led to an increase in oxygenation by 30 %. Subsequently, to reduce invasiveness of mechanical ventilation, FCV was individualized by dynamic compliance guided adjustment of both, positive end-expiratory pressure and peak pressure; this intervention reduced driving pressure from 18 to 12 cm H(2)O. However, after several hours, compliance further deteriorated which resulted in a tidal volume of only 4.7 ml/kg. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized FCV approach increased oxygenation parameters in a patient suffering from severe COVID-19 related ARDS. Direct intratracheal pressure measurements allow for determination of dynamic compliance and thus optimization of ventilator settings, thereby reducing applied and dissipated energy. However, although desirable, this personalized ventilation strategy may reach its limits when lung function is so severely impaired that patient’s oxygenation has to be ensured at the expense of lung protective ventilation concepts. BioMed Central 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8113787/ /pubmed/33980178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01365-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Case Report
Spraider, Patrick
Putzer, Gabriel
Breitkopf, Robert
Abram, Julia
Mathis, Simon
Glodny, Bernhard
Martini, Judith
A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation
title A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation
title_full A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation
title_fullStr A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation
title_full_unstemmed A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation
title_short A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation
title_sort case report of individualized ventilation in a covid-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01365-y
work_keys_str_mv AT spraiderpatrick acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT putzergabriel acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT breitkopfrobert acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT abramjulia acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT mathissimon acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT glodnybernhard acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT martinijudith acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT spraiderpatrick casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT putzergabriel casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT breitkopfrobert casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT abramjulia casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT mathissimon casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT glodnybernhard casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation
AT martinijudith casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation