Cargando…
A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation
BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and vent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01365-y |
_version_ | 1783690935444439040 |
---|---|
author | Spraider, Patrick Putzer, Gabriel Breitkopf, Robert Abram, Julia Mathis, Simon Glodny, Bernhard Martini, Judith |
author_facet | Spraider, Patrick Putzer, Gabriel Breitkopf, Robert Abram, Julia Mathis, Simon Glodny, Bernhard Martini, Judith |
author_sort | Spraider, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and ventilatory settings compared to conventional ventilation modes. In addition, the constant flow combined with direct intratracheal pressure measurement allows determination of dynamic compliance and ventilation settings can be adjusted accordingly, reflecting a personalized ventilation approach. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year old women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was admitted to a tertiary medical center. Initial ventilation occurred with best standard of care pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and was then switched to FCV, by adopting PCV ventilator settings. This led to an increase in oxygenation by 30 %. Subsequently, to reduce invasiveness of mechanical ventilation, FCV was individualized by dynamic compliance guided adjustment of both, positive end-expiratory pressure and peak pressure; this intervention reduced driving pressure from 18 to 12 cm H(2)O. However, after several hours, compliance further deteriorated which resulted in a tidal volume of only 4.7 ml/kg. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized FCV approach increased oxygenation parameters in a patient suffering from severe COVID-19 related ARDS. Direct intratracheal pressure measurements allow for determination of dynamic compliance and thus optimization of ventilator settings, thereby reducing applied and dissipated energy. However, although desirable, this personalized ventilation strategy may reach its limits when lung function is so severely impaired that patient’s oxygenation has to be ensured at the expense of lung protective ventilation concepts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8113787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81137872021-05-12 A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation Spraider, Patrick Putzer, Gabriel Breitkopf, Robert Abram, Julia Mathis, Simon Glodny, Bernhard Martini, Judith BMC Anesthesiol Case Report BACKGROUND: Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and ventilatory settings compared to conventional ventilation modes. In addition, the constant flow combined with direct intratracheal pressure measurement allows determination of dynamic compliance and ventilation settings can be adjusted accordingly, reflecting a personalized ventilation approach. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year old women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was admitted to a tertiary medical center. Initial ventilation occurred with best standard of care pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and was then switched to FCV, by adopting PCV ventilator settings. This led to an increase in oxygenation by 30 %. Subsequently, to reduce invasiveness of mechanical ventilation, FCV was individualized by dynamic compliance guided adjustment of both, positive end-expiratory pressure and peak pressure; this intervention reduced driving pressure from 18 to 12 cm H(2)O. However, after several hours, compliance further deteriorated which resulted in a tidal volume of only 4.7 ml/kg. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized FCV approach increased oxygenation parameters in a patient suffering from severe COVID-19 related ARDS. Direct intratracheal pressure measurements allow for determination of dynamic compliance and thus optimization of ventilator settings, thereby reducing applied and dissipated energy. However, although desirable, this personalized ventilation strategy may reach its limits when lung function is so severely impaired that patient’s oxygenation has to be ensured at the expense of lung protective ventilation concepts. BioMed Central 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8113787/ /pubmed/33980178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01365-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Spraider, Patrick Putzer, Gabriel Breitkopf, Robert Abram, Julia Mathis, Simon Glodny, Bernhard Martini, Judith A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation |
title | A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation |
title_full | A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation |
title_fullStr | A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation |
title_full_unstemmed | A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation |
title_short | A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation |
title_sort | case report of individualized ventilation in a covid-19 patient – new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01365-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spraiderpatrick acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT putzergabriel acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT breitkopfrobert acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT abramjulia acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT mathissimon acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT glodnybernhard acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT martinijudith acasereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT spraiderpatrick casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT putzergabriel casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT breitkopfrobert casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT abramjulia casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT mathissimon casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT glodnybernhard casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation AT martinijudith casereportofindividualizedventilationinacovid19patientnewpossibilitiesandcaveatstoconsiderwithflowcontrolledventilation |