Cargando…

Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework

The early detection of health disorders is a central goal in livestock production. Thus, a great demand for technologies enabling the automated detection of such issues exists. However, despite decades of research, precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies with sufficient accuracy and ready for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stachowicz, Joanna, Umstätter, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0190
_version_ 1783690960170909696
author Stachowicz, Joanna
Umstätter, Christina
author_facet Stachowicz, Joanna
Umstätter, Christina
author_sort Stachowicz, Joanna
collection PubMed
description The early detection of health disorders is a central goal in livestock production. Thus, a great demand for technologies enabling the automated detection of such issues exists. However, despite decades of research, precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies with sufficient accuracy and ready for implementation on commercial farms are rare. A central factor impeding technological development is likely the use of non-specific indicators for various issues. On commercial farms, where animals are exposed to changing environmental conditions, where they undergo different internal states and, most importantly, where they can be challenged by more than one issue at a time, such an approach leads inevitably to errors. To improve the accuracy of PLF technologies, the presented framework proposes a categorization of the aim of detection of issues related to general welfare, disease and distress and defined disease. Each decision level provides a different degree of information and therefore requires indicators varying in specificity. Based on these considerations, it becomes apparent that while most technologies aim to detect a defined health issue, they facilitate only the identification of issues related to general welfare. To achieve detection of specific issues, new indicators such as rhythmicity patterns of behaviour or physiological processes should be examined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8113903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81139032021-05-25 Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework Stachowicz, Joanna Umstätter, Christina Proc Biol Sci Evidence Synthesis The early detection of health disorders is a central goal in livestock production. Thus, a great demand for technologies enabling the automated detection of such issues exists. However, despite decades of research, precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies with sufficient accuracy and ready for implementation on commercial farms are rare. A central factor impeding technological development is likely the use of non-specific indicators for various issues. On commercial farms, where animals are exposed to changing environmental conditions, where they undergo different internal states and, most importantly, where they can be challenged by more than one issue at a time, such an approach leads inevitably to errors. To improve the accuracy of PLF technologies, the presented framework proposes a categorization of the aim of detection of issues related to general welfare, disease and distress and defined disease. Each decision level provides a different degree of information and therefore requires indicators varying in specificity. Based on these considerations, it becomes apparent that while most technologies aim to detect a defined health issue, they facilitate only the identification of issues related to general welfare. To achieve detection of specific issues, new indicators such as rhythmicity patterns of behaviour or physiological processes should be examined. The Royal Society 2021-05-12 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8113903/ /pubmed/33975474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0190 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Evidence Synthesis
Stachowicz, Joanna
Umstätter, Christina
Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework
title Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework
title_full Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework
title_fullStr Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework
title_full_unstemmed Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework
title_short Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework
title_sort do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? a framework
topic Evidence Synthesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0190
work_keys_str_mv AT stachowiczjoanna doweautomaticallydetecthealthorgeneralwelfarerelatedissuesaframework
AT umstatterchristina doweautomaticallydetecthealthorgeneralwelfarerelatedissuesaframework