Cargando…
Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework
The early detection of health disorders is a central goal in livestock production. Thus, a great demand for technologies enabling the automated detection of such issues exists. However, despite decades of research, precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies with sufficient accuracy and ready for...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0190 |
_version_ | 1783690960170909696 |
---|---|
author | Stachowicz, Joanna Umstätter, Christina |
author_facet | Stachowicz, Joanna Umstätter, Christina |
author_sort | Stachowicz, Joanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | The early detection of health disorders is a central goal in livestock production. Thus, a great demand for technologies enabling the automated detection of such issues exists. However, despite decades of research, precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies with sufficient accuracy and ready for implementation on commercial farms are rare. A central factor impeding technological development is likely the use of non-specific indicators for various issues. On commercial farms, where animals are exposed to changing environmental conditions, where they undergo different internal states and, most importantly, where they can be challenged by more than one issue at a time, such an approach leads inevitably to errors. To improve the accuracy of PLF technologies, the presented framework proposes a categorization of the aim of detection of issues related to general welfare, disease and distress and defined disease. Each decision level provides a different degree of information and therefore requires indicators varying in specificity. Based on these considerations, it becomes apparent that while most technologies aim to detect a defined health issue, they facilitate only the identification of issues related to general welfare. To achieve detection of specific issues, new indicators such as rhythmicity patterns of behaviour or physiological processes should be examined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8113903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81139032021-05-25 Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework Stachowicz, Joanna Umstätter, Christina Proc Biol Sci Evidence Synthesis The early detection of health disorders is a central goal in livestock production. Thus, a great demand for technologies enabling the automated detection of such issues exists. However, despite decades of research, precision livestock farming (PLF) technologies with sufficient accuracy and ready for implementation on commercial farms are rare. A central factor impeding technological development is likely the use of non-specific indicators for various issues. On commercial farms, where animals are exposed to changing environmental conditions, where they undergo different internal states and, most importantly, where they can be challenged by more than one issue at a time, such an approach leads inevitably to errors. To improve the accuracy of PLF technologies, the presented framework proposes a categorization of the aim of detection of issues related to general welfare, disease and distress and defined disease. Each decision level provides a different degree of information and therefore requires indicators varying in specificity. Based on these considerations, it becomes apparent that while most technologies aim to detect a defined health issue, they facilitate only the identification of issues related to general welfare. To achieve detection of specific issues, new indicators such as rhythmicity patterns of behaviour or physiological processes should be examined. The Royal Society 2021-05-12 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8113903/ /pubmed/33975474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0190 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Evidence Synthesis Stachowicz, Joanna Umstätter, Christina Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework |
title | Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework |
title_full | Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework |
title_fullStr | Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework |
title_short | Do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? A framework |
title_sort | do we automatically detect health- or general welfare-related issues? a framework |
topic | Evidence Synthesis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stachowiczjoanna doweautomaticallydetecthealthorgeneralwelfarerelatedissuesaframework AT umstatterchristina doweautomaticallydetecthealthorgeneralwelfarerelatedissuesaframework |