Cargando…

Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The treatment for borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) has historically been arthroscopic surgery or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). As orthopaedic surgery is constantly evolving, a lack of comparison of outcomes for these 2 treatment methods could potentially be stalling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murata, Yoichi, Fukase, Naomasa, Martin, Maitland, Soares, Rui, Pierpoint, Lauren, Dornan, Grant J., Uchida, Soshi, Philippon, Marc J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211007401
_version_ 1783690975158206464
author Murata, Yoichi
Fukase, Naomasa
Martin, Maitland
Soares, Rui
Pierpoint, Lauren
Dornan, Grant J.
Uchida, Soshi
Philippon, Marc J.
author_facet Murata, Yoichi
Fukase, Naomasa
Martin, Maitland
Soares, Rui
Pierpoint, Lauren
Dornan, Grant J.
Uchida, Soshi
Philippon, Marc J.
author_sort Murata, Yoichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment for borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) has historically been arthroscopic surgery or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). As orthopaedic surgery is constantly evolving, a lack of comparison of outcomes for these 2 treatment methods could potentially be stalling the progression of treatment for patients with BDDH. PURPOSE: To evaluate the existing literature on patient characteristics, procedures, clinical outcomes, and failure rates for patients with BDDH and to determine whether PAO or hip arthroscopic surgery is a better treatment method for patients with BDDH. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Studies included were found using the following search words: “hip” and “borderline dysplasia,” “osteotomy” or “arthroscopy,” and “outcome” or “procedure.” Articles were included if they detailed participants of all sexes and ages, reported on isolated hips, and had patients diagnosed with BDDH. RESULTS: A search was conducted across 3 databases, resulting in 469 articles for consideration, from which 12 total studies (10 on arthroscopic surgery and 2 on PAO) were chosen for a review. There were 6 studies that included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 18° to 25°, while the remainder included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 20° to 25°. All the studies reviewing arthroscopic surgery reported concomitant/accessory procedures, while the articles on the topic of PAO did not. It was determined that, whether treated using arthroscopic surgery or PAO, outcomes improved across all patient-reported outcome measures. Revision surgery was also common in both procedures. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of consensus in the literature on the best treatment option for patients with BDDH. Preoperative patient characteristics and concomitant injuries should be considered when evaluating which surgical procedure will result in the most favorable outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8113971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81139712021-05-14 Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review Murata, Yoichi Fukase, Naomasa Martin, Maitland Soares, Rui Pierpoint, Lauren Dornan, Grant J. Uchida, Soshi Philippon, Marc J. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The treatment for borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip (BDDH) has historically been arthroscopic surgery or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). As orthopaedic surgery is constantly evolving, a lack of comparison of outcomes for these 2 treatment methods could potentially be stalling the progression of treatment for patients with BDDH. PURPOSE: To evaluate the existing literature on patient characteristics, procedures, clinical outcomes, and failure rates for patients with BDDH and to determine whether PAO or hip arthroscopic surgery is a better treatment method for patients with BDDH. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Studies included were found using the following search words: “hip” and “borderline dysplasia,” “osteotomy” or “arthroscopy,” and “outcome” or “procedure.” Articles were included if they detailed participants of all sexes and ages, reported on isolated hips, and had patients diagnosed with BDDH. RESULTS: A search was conducted across 3 databases, resulting in 469 articles for consideration, from which 12 total studies (10 on arthroscopic surgery and 2 on PAO) were chosen for a review. There were 6 studies that included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 18° to 25°, while the remainder included patients with a lateral center-edge angle of 20° to 25°. All the studies reviewing arthroscopic surgery reported concomitant/accessory procedures, while the articles on the topic of PAO did not. It was determined that, whether treated using arthroscopic surgery or PAO, outcomes improved across all patient-reported outcome measures. Revision surgery was also common in both procedures. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of consensus in the literature on the best treatment option for patients with BDDH. Preoperative patient characteristics and concomitant injuries should be considered when evaluating which surgical procedure will result in the most favorable outcomes. SAGE Publications 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8113971/ /pubmed/33997083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211007401 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Murata, Yoichi
Fukase, Naomasa
Martin, Maitland
Soares, Rui
Pierpoint, Lauren
Dornan, Grant J.
Uchida, Soshi
Philippon, Marc J.
Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review
title Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review
title_full Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review
title_short Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review
title_sort comparison between hip arthroscopic surgery and periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8113971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33997083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211007401
work_keys_str_mv AT muratayoichi comparisonbetweenhiparthroscopicsurgeryandperiacetabularosteotomyforthetreatmentofpatientswithborderlinedevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipasystematicreview
AT fukasenaomasa comparisonbetweenhiparthroscopicsurgeryandperiacetabularosteotomyforthetreatmentofpatientswithborderlinedevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipasystematicreview
AT martinmaitland comparisonbetweenhiparthroscopicsurgeryandperiacetabularosteotomyforthetreatmentofpatientswithborderlinedevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipasystematicreview
AT soaresrui comparisonbetweenhiparthroscopicsurgeryandperiacetabularosteotomyforthetreatmentofpatientswithborderlinedevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipasystematicreview
AT pierpointlauren comparisonbetweenhiparthroscopicsurgeryandperiacetabularosteotomyforthetreatmentofpatientswithborderlinedevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipasystematicreview
AT dornangrantj comparisonbetweenhiparthroscopicsurgeryandperiacetabularosteotomyforthetreatmentofpatientswithborderlinedevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipasystematicreview
AT uchidasoshi comparisonbetweenhiparthroscopicsurgeryandperiacetabularosteotomyforthetreatmentofpatientswithborderlinedevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipasystematicreview
AT philipponmarcj comparisonbetweenhiparthroscopicsurgeryandperiacetabularosteotomyforthetreatmentofpatientswithborderlinedevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehipasystematicreview