Cargando…

Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period

Neuronal and psychophysical responses to a visual stimulus are known to depend on the preceding history of visual stimulation, but the effect of stimulation history on reflexive eye movements has received less attention. Here, we quantify these effects using short-latency ocular following responses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheliga, Boris M., Quaia, Christian, FitzGibbon, Edmond J., Cumming, Bruce G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.5.8
_version_ 1783690983187152896
author Sheliga, Boris M.
Quaia, Christian
FitzGibbon, Edmond J.
Cumming, Bruce G.
author_facet Sheliga, Boris M.
Quaia, Christian
FitzGibbon, Edmond J.
Cumming, Bruce G.
author_sort Sheliga, Boris M.
collection PubMed
description Neuronal and psychophysical responses to a visual stimulus are known to depend on the preceding history of visual stimulation, but the effect of stimulation history on reflexive eye movements has received less attention. Here, we quantify these effects using short-latency ocular following responses (OFRs), a valuable tool for studying early motion processing. We recorded, in human subjects, the horizontal OFRs induced by drifting vertical 1D pink noise. The stimulus was preceded by 600 to 1000 ms of maintained fixation (on a visible cross), and we explored the effect of different stimuli (“fixation patterns”) presented during the fixation period. We found that any temporal modulation present during the fixation period reduced the magnitude of the subsequent OFRs. Even changes in the overall luminance during the fixation period induced significant suppression. The magnitude of the effect was a function of both spatial and temporal structure of the fixation pattern. Suppression that was selective for both relative orientation and relative spatial frequency accounted for a considerable fraction of total suppression. Finally, changes in stimulus temporal structure alone (i.e. “flicker” versus “transparent motion”) led to changes in the spatial frequency tuning of suppression. In the time domain, the suppression developed quickly: 100 ms of temporal modulation in the fixation pattern produced up to 80% of maximal suppression. Recovery from suppression was instead more gradual, taking up to several seconds. By presenting transparent motion during the fixation period, with opposite motion signals having different spatial frequency content, we also discovered a direction-selective component of suppression, which depended on both the frequency and the direction of the moving stimulus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8114009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81140092021-05-19 Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period Sheliga, Boris M. Quaia, Christian FitzGibbon, Edmond J. Cumming, Bruce G. J Vis Article Neuronal and psychophysical responses to a visual stimulus are known to depend on the preceding history of visual stimulation, but the effect of stimulation history on reflexive eye movements has received less attention. Here, we quantify these effects using short-latency ocular following responses (OFRs), a valuable tool for studying early motion processing. We recorded, in human subjects, the horizontal OFRs induced by drifting vertical 1D pink noise. The stimulus was preceded by 600 to 1000 ms of maintained fixation (on a visible cross), and we explored the effect of different stimuli (“fixation patterns”) presented during the fixation period. We found that any temporal modulation present during the fixation period reduced the magnitude of the subsequent OFRs. Even changes in the overall luminance during the fixation period induced significant suppression. The magnitude of the effect was a function of both spatial and temporal structure of the fixation pattern. Suppression that was selective for both relative orientation and relative spatial frequency accounted for a considerable fraction of total suppression. Finally, changes in stimulus temporal structure alone (i.e. “flicker” versus “transparent motion”) led to changes in the spatial frequency tuning of suppression. In the time domain, the suppression developed quickly: 100 ms of temporal modulation in the fixation pattern produced up to 80% of maximal suppression. Recovery from suppression was instead more gradual, taking up to several seconds. By presenting transparent motion during the fixation period, with opposite motion signals having different spatial frequency content, we also discovered a direction-selective component of suppression, which depended on both the frequency and the direction of the moving stimulus. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8114009/ /pubmed/33970195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.5.8 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Sheliga, Boris M.
Quaia, Christian
FitzGibbon, Edmond J.
Cumming, Bruce G.
Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period
title Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period
title_full Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period
title_fullStr Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period
title_full_unstemmed Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period
title_short Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period
title_sort short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.5.8
work_keys_str_mv AT sheligaborism shortlatencyocularfollowingresponsestomotionstimuliarestronglyaffectedbytemporalmodulationsofthevisualcontentduringtheinitialfixationperiod
AT quaiachristian shortlatencyocularfollowingresponsestomotionstimuliarestronglyaffectedbytemporalmodulationsofthevisualcontentduringtheinitialfixationperiod
AT fitzgibbonedmondj shortlatencyocularfollowingresponsestomotionstimuliarestronglyaffectedbytemporalmodulationsofthevisualcontentduringtheinitialfixationperiod
AT cummingbruceg shortlatencyocularfollowingresponsestomotionstimuliarestronglyaffectedbytemporalmodulationsofthevisualcontentduringtheinitialfixationperiod