Cargando…

Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769 × MON 89788

The European Commission mandated EFSA to complement its original scientific opinion on soybean MON 87769 ×  MON 89788 (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) considering additional information on the human nutritional assessment of refined bleached deodorised oil produced from the two‐event stack soybean (RBD GM‐oil)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Bresson, Jean Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michelle M, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Mullins, Ewen, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Frenzel, Thomas, Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012490
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6589
_version_ 1783691013132386304
author Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Frenzel, Thomas
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
author_facet Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Frenzel, Thomas
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
collection PubMed
description The European Commission mandated EFSA to complement its original scientific opinion on soybean MON 87769 ×  MON 89788 (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) considering additional information on the human nutritional assessment of refined bleached deodorised oil produced from the two‐event stack soybean (RBD GM‐oil). The assessment was mainly based on a replacement scenario with a list of target foods where RBD GM‐oil is intended to be added. Intake estimations for several fatty acids present in the RBD GM‐oil, in particular γ‐linolenic acid (GLA), stearidonic acid (SDA) and linoleic acid (LA) were based on the consumption of the corresponding foods that are likely to be displaced. The assessment of LA considered the established adequate intake of 4% of total energy intake (E%) and that LA deficiency has not been observed with intakes > 1 E%. The assessment of GLA and SDA was conducted using maximum doses without adverse effects from intervention human studies as reference (4.2 grams/day for SDA and 2.8 grams/day for GLA) since no tolerable upper intake levels are set for these fatty acids. The decrease observed in the levels of LA in RBD GM‐oil as compared to oil from conventional soybean does not represent a nutritional concern as intakes were in all cases above 1 E%. For GLA, all intake estimations were below the reference dose indicating no safety concern. SDA intake estimations do not pose any safety concerns based on the overly conservative nature of the estimates, the absence of toxicological hazards and the rapid metabolism of SDA in humans. The GMO Panel concluded that the consumption of soybean MON 87769 ×  MON 89788 and their derived products, in particular its RBD oil, does not represent a nutritional concern in humans. A post‐market monitoring plan is recommended to confirm the predicted consumption and the application of conditions of uses considered during the pre‐market risk assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8114199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81141992021-05-18 Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769 × MON 89788 Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Frenzel, Thomas Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel EFSA J Scientific Opinion The European Commission mandated EFSA to complement its original scientific opinion on soybean MON 87769 ×  MON 89788 (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) considering additional information on the human nutritional assessment of refined bleached deodorised oil produced from the two‐event stack soybean (RBD GM‐oil). The assessment was mainly based on a replacement scenario with a list of target foods where RBD GM‐oil is intended to be added. Intake estimations for several fatty acids present in the RBD GM‐oil, in particular γ‐linolenic acid (GLA), stearidonic acid (SDA) and linoleic acid (LA) were based on the consumption of the corresponding foods that are likely to be displaced. The assessment of LA considered the established adequate intake of 4% of total energy intake (E%) and that LA deficiency has not been observed with intakes > 1 E%. The assessment of GLA and SDA was conducted using maximum doses without adverse effects from intervention human studies as reference (4.2 grams/day for SDA and 2.8 grams/day for GLA) since no tolerable upper intake levels are set for these fatty acids. The decrease observed in the levels of LA in RBD GM‐oil as compared to oil from conventional soybean does not represent a nutritional concern as intakes were in all cases above 1 E%. For GLA, all intake estimations were below the reference dose indicating no safety concern. SDA intake estimations do not pose any safety concerns based on the overly conservative nature of the estimates, the absence of toxicological hazards and the rapid metabolism of SDA in humans. The GMO Panel concluded that the consumption of soybean MON 87769 ×  MON 89788 and their derived products, in particular its RBD oil, does not represent a nutritional concern in humans. A post‐market monitoring plan is recommended to confirm the predicted consumption and the application of conditions of uses considered during the pre‐market risk assessment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8114199/ /pubmed/34012490 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6589 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Frenzel, Thomas
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769 × MON 89788
title Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769 × MON 89788
title_full Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769 × MON 89788
title_fullStr Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769 × MON 89788
title_full_unstemmed Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769 × MON 89788
title_short Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2010‐85) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769 × MON 89788
title_sort statement complementing the efsa scientific opinion on application (efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2010‐85) for authorisation of food and feed containing, consisting of and produced from genetically modified soybean mon 87769 × mon 89788
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34012490
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6589
work_keys_str_mv AT statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT naegelihanspeter statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT bressonjeanlouis statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT dalmaytamas statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT dewhurstiancrawford statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT epsteinmichellem statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT firbanklesliegeorge statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT guerchephilippe statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT hejatkojan statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT morenofranciscojavier statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT mullinsewen statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT noguefabien statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT rostoksnils statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT sanchezserranojosejuan statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT savoinigiovanni statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT veromanneve statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT veronesifabio statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT frenzelthomas statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788
AT gomezruizjoseangel statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopiniononapplicationefsagmonl201085forauthorisationoffoodandfeedcontainingconsistingofandproducedfromgeneticallymodifiedsoybeanmon87769mon89788