Cargando…
‘Life communication’ after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster: what experts need to learn from residential non-scientific rationality
After chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or explosive (CBRNE) disasters, trepidation and infodemics about invisible hazards may cause indirect casualties in the affected society. Effective communication regarding technical issues between disaster experts and the residents is key to averting...
Autor principal: | Ochi, Sae |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33978175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rraa135 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Communicating with residents about 10 years of scientific progress in understanding thyroid cancer risk in children after the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station accident
por: Suzuki, Gen
Publicado: (2021) -
Trajectories of peer relationship problems and emotional symptoms in children 5 years after a nuclear disaster: Fukushima Health Management Survey
por: Itagaki, Shuntaro, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Experiences of crisis communication during radiation emergency and risk communication for recovery of the community in Fukushima
por: Takamura, Noboru, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Intention to return in residents of Okuma and its characteristics: the evacuation order was lifted eight years after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident
por: Matsunaga, Hitomi, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The importance of trustworthy sources of scientific information in risk communication with the public
por: Crick, Malcolm J
Publicado: (2021)