The importance of trustworthy sources of scientific information in risk communication with the public

In the event of a nuclear accident or radiological emergency, effective communication with the public on radiation risks is important in order to contain and rein in damage to physical and mental health, and social and economic consequences. The purpose of this paper is to summarize features of trustworthy sources of scientific information, and to convey their importance in radiation risk communication by recalling other aspects influencing the effectiveness of that communication. This will draw on key references in the literature, augmented with some experience and insight gleaned from a professional career of more than 35 years at the national and international level, including contributing to the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) work on the consequences of the Chernobyl accident (1990–1995), heading its incident and emergency centre (1996–2005), and as the secretary (2005–2018) of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), which conducts scientific reviews on the levels and effects of radiation exposure. The paper highlights the necessity of sound science and trustworthy sources, and recapitulates the main elements needed both to ensure solid conclusions on radiation epidemiology and to foster trust. The paper concludes that, while sound science and trustworthy sources are necessary, they are in themselves to a greater or lesser degree insufficient to ensure fully effective risk communication. Some of the major problems in communicating this science are highlighted to help others charged with preparing for and conducting this onerous task in the future.