Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship

OBJECTIVE: This study provides the first comprehensive meta-analysis of the relationship between executive function (EF) and performance of health behaviours in healthy populations. METHOD: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched, and forward and backward citat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gray-Burrows, Kara, Taylor, Natalie, O’Connor, Daryl, Sutherland, Ed, Stoet, Gijsbert, Conner, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2019.1637740
_version_ 1783691047461715968
author Gray-Burrows, Kara
Taylor, Natalie
O’Connor, Daryl
Sutherland, Ed
Stoet, Gijsbert
Conner, Mark
author_facet Gray-Burrows, Kara
Taylor, Natalie
O’Connor, Daryl
Sutherland, Ed
Stoet, Gijsbert
Conner, Mark
author_sort Gray-Burrows, Kara
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study provides the first comprehensive meta-analysis of the relationship between executive function (EF) and performance of health behaviours in healthy populations. METHOD: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched, and forward and backward citation tracking was undertaken to identify articles investigating the relationship between EF and health behaviour. Studies were eligible if they examined the direct correlational relationship between EF and health behaviour in healthy populations, were available in English and published in peer-reviewed journals in any year. RESULTS: Sixty-one articles covering 65 tests were included in a random effects meta-analysis. Several moderators were assessed, including: the type, and addictiveness of the health behaviour; the type of EF measure; study design, and sample characteristics. Overall EF had a significant, but small correlation with health behaviour; EF was significantly positively associated with health-protective behaviours and significantly negatively associated with health-damaging behaviours. There was considerable heterogeneity in the observed effect sizes, but this was not explained by the examined moderators. CONCLUSIONS: Although the meta-analysis indicates a significant effect for EF on health behaviour, effect size is small. Due to the complex nature of EF, more research is required to further elucidate the relationship between EF and health behaviour in its entire conceptualization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8114370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81143702021-05-25 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship Gray-Burrows, Kara Taylor, Natalie O’Connor, Daryl Sutherland, Ed Stoet, Gijsbert Conner, Mark Health Psychol Behav Med Meta-Analysis OBJECTIVE: This study provides the first comprehensive meta-analysis of the relationship between executive function (EF) and performance of health behaviours in healthy populations. METHOD: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched, and forward and backward citation tracking was undertaken to identify articles investigating the relationship between EF and health behaviour. Studies were eligible if they examined the direct correlational relationship between EF and health behaviour in healthy populations, were available in English and published in peer-reviewed journals in any year. RESULTS: Sixty-one articles covering 65 tests were included in a random effects meta-analysis. Several moderators were assessed, including: the type, and addictiveness of the health behaviour; the type of EF measure; study design, and sample characteristics. Overall EF had a significant, but small correlation with health behaviour; EF was significantly positively associated with health-protective behaviours and significantly negatively associated with health-damaging behaviours. There was considerable heterogeneity in the observed effect sizes, but this was not explained by the examined moderators. CONCLUSIONS: Although the meta-analysis indicates a significant effect for EF on health behaviour, effect size is small. Due to the complex nature of EF, more research is required to further elucidate the relationship between EF and health behaviour in its entire conceptualization. Routledge 2019-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8114370/ /pubmed/34040850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2019.1637740 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Gray-Burrows, Kara
Taylor, Natalie
O’Connor, Daryl
Sutherland, Ed
Stoet, Gijsbert
Conner, Mark
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of the executive function-health behaviour relationship
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2019.1637740
work_keys_str_mv AT grayburrowskara asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT taylornatalie asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT oconnordaryl asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT sutherlanded asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT stoetgijsbert asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT connermark asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT grayburrowskara systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT taylornatalie systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT oconnordaryl systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT sutherlanded systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT stoetgijsbert systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship
AT connermark systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheexecutivefunctionhealthbehaviourrelationship