Cargando…

From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies

Objective: This invited paper offers an innovative framework for mixed methods research design. Method: We propose the adoption of the Model of Disciplined Inquiry, a five-component model that focuses on the research question(s) rather than the type(s) of data collected. This pluralist model firmly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, Rachel L., Hiles, David R., West, Karen, Holland, Carol, Gwyther, Holly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Routledge 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2018.1515016
_version_ 1783691051970592768
author Shaw, Rachel L.
Hiles, David R.
West, Karen
Holland, Carol
Gwyther, Holly
author_facet Shaw, Rachel L.
Hiles, David R.
West, Karen
Holland, Carol
Gwyther, Holly
author_sort Shaw, Rachel L.
collection PubMed
description Objective: This invited paper offers an innovative framework for mixed methods research design. Method: We propose the adoption of the Model of Disciplined Inquiry, a five-component model that focuses on the research question(s) rather than the type(s) of data collected. This pluralist model firmly anchors the research design and paradigm assumptions in the research question(s). Decisions about an appropriate research strategy are made in line with those assumptions. We propose three logics of inquiry to help articulate the processes involved in making sense of findings and their relationship to theory. Results: The Model of Disciplined Inquiry is demonstrated by applying it to the framework to a longitudinal study and describe our decision-making processes at each component stage. The results support the arguement in favour of shifting the focus away from the types of data generated (i.e. qualitative or quantitative) and relatedly a move away from mixed methods research to mixed design research. Conclusion: We conclude the paper with some challenges experienced in the example study and some challenges yet to be resolved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8114392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Routledge
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81143922021-05-25 From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies Shaw, Rachel L. Hiles, David R. West, Karen Holland, Carol Gwyther, Holly Health Psychol Behav Med Advanced Methods in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine Objective: This invited paper offers an innovative framework for mixed methods research design. Method: We propose the adoption of the Model of Disciplined Inquiry, a five-component model that focuses on the research question(s) rather than the type(s) of data collected. This pluralist model firmly anchors the research design and paradigm assumptions in the research question(s). Decisions about an appropriate research strategy are made in line with those assumptions. We propose three logics of inquiry to help articulate the processes involved in making sense of findings and their relationship to theory. Results: The Model of Disciplined Inquiry is demonstrated by applying it to the framework to a longitudinal study and describe our decision-making processes at each component stage. The results support the arguement in favour of shifting the focus away from the types of data generated (i.e. qualitative or quantitative) and relatedly a move away from mixed methods research to mixed design research. Conclusion: We conclude the paper with some challenges experienced in the example study and some challenges yet to be resolved. Routledge 2018-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8114392/ /pubmed/34040830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2018.1515016 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Advanced Methods in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
Shaw, Rachel L.
Hiles, David R.
West, Karen
Holland, Carol
Gwyther, Holly
From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies
title From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies
title_full From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies
title_fullStr From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies
title_full_unstemmed From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies
title_short From Mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies
title_sort from mixing methods to the logic(s) of inquiry: taking a fresh look at developing mixed design studies
topic Advanced Methods in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34040830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2018.1515016
work_keys_str_mv AT shawrachell frommixingmethodstothelogicsofinquirytakingafreshlookatdevelopingmixeddesignstudies
AT hilesdavidr frommixingmethodstothelogicsofinquirytakingafreshlookatdevelopingmixeddesignstudies
AT westkaren frommixingmethodstothelogicsofinquirytakingafreshlookatdevelopingmixeddesignstudies
AT hollandcarol frommixingmethodstothelogicsofinquirytakingafreshlookatdevelopingmixeddesignstudies
AT gwytherholly frommixingmethodstothelogicsofinquirytakingafreshlookatdevelopingmixeddesignstudies