Cargando…
Open‐access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split‐dose bowel preparation
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Open‐access (OA) colonoscopies are defined as those scheduled without a gastrointestinal (GI) office visit. Past research has not focused on split preparation use and patient perception within OA. We aim to identify differences in bowel preparation (BP) adequacy, adenoma detectio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12532 |
_version_ | 1783691153883791360 |
---|---|
author | Manem, Nihita Donovan, Katherine Miller, David Yodice, Michael Wang, Katie Balogun, Khadijat Kabbach, Ghassan Feustel, Paul Tadros, Micheal |
author_facet | Manem, Nihita Donovan, Katherine Miller, David Yodice, Michael Wang, Katie Balogun, Khadijat Kabbach, Ghassan Feustel, Paul Tadros, Micheal |
author_sort | Manem, Nihita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Open‐access (OA) colonoscopies are defined as those scheduled without a gastrointestinal (GI) office visit. Past research has not focused on split preparation use and patient perception within OA. We aim to identify differences in bowel preparation (BP) adequacy, adenoma detection rate (ADR), self‐reported compliance, and patient perception between OA and GI providers using split prep. METHODS: This was a cross‐sectional study using split BP for colonoscopies. Patients completed a survey, and demographics, BP adequacy, and ADR were recorded. BP compliance was self‐reported. Patients were asked three questions qualifying the BP instructions. Data were analyzed using chi square and Mann–Whitney tests by SPSS. RESULTS: BP adequacy was reported for 56 of 60 patients. Twenty‐one participants (38%) were scheduled on OA, and 35 participants (62%) were scheduled after a GI office visit. Adequate BP was more frequent in 86% (18/21) of OA patients compared to 60% (21/35) in the GI group (P = 0.043). OA patients reported better review and explanation of the BP instructions compared to GI patients. There was no statistical difference between the demographics of the OA and GI groups or self‐reported compliance and patient understanding of instructions. CONCLUSION: OA scheduled colonoscopies were associated with more adequate BP. This could be explained by patients' self‐motivation or an explanation of the importance of completing BP. This study supports the use of OA procedures as a standard of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8114982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81149822021-05-18 Open‐access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split‐dose bowel preparation Manem, Nihita Donovan, Katherine Miller, David Yodice, Michael Wang, Katie Balogun, Khadijat Kabbach, Ghassan Feustel, Paul Tadros, Micheal JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Open‐access (OA) colonoscopies are defined as those scheduled without a gastrointestinal (GI) office visit. Past research has not focused on split preparation use and patient perception within OA. We aim to identify differences in bowel preparation (BP) adequacy, adenoma detection rate (ADR), self‐reported compliance, and patient perception between OA and GI providers using split prep. METHODS: This was a cross‐sectional study using split BP for colonoscopies. Patients completed a survey, and demographics, BP adequacy, and ADR were recorded. BP compliance was self‐reported. Patients were asked three questions qualifying the BP instructions. Data were analyzed using chi square and Mann–Whitney tests by SPSS. RESULTS: BP adequacy was reported for 56 of 60 patients. Twenty‐one participants (38%) were scheduled on OA, and 35 participants (62%) were scheduled after a GI office visit. Adequate BP was more frequent in 86% (18/21) of OA patients compared to 60% (21/35) in the GI group (P = 0.043). OA patients reported better review and explanation of the BP instructions compared to GI patients. There was no statistical difference between the demographics of the OA and GI groups or self‐reported compliance and patient understanding of instructions. CONCLUSION: OA scheduled colonoscopies were associated with more adequate BP. This could be explained by patients' self‐motivation or an explanation of the importance of completing BP. This study supports the use of OA procedures as a standard of care. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2021-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8114982/ /pubmed/34013055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12532 Text en © 2021 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Manem, Nihita Donovan, Katherine Miller, David Yodice, Michael Wang, Katie Balogun, Khadijat Kabbach, Ghassan Feustel, Paul Tadros, Micheal Open‐access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split‐dose bowel preparation |
title | Open‐access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split‐dose bowel preparation |
title_full | Open‐access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split‐dose bowel preparation |
title_fullStr | Open‐access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split‐dose bowel preparation |
title_full_unstemmed | Open‐access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split‐dose bowel preparation |
title_short | Open‐access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split‐dose bowel preparation |
title_sort | open‐access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split‐dose bowel preparation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8114982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12532 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manemnihita openaccesscolonoscopyqualityindicatorsandpatientperceptionusingsplitdosebowelpreparation AT donovankatherine openaccesscolonoscopyqualityindicatorsandpatientperceptionusingsplitdosebowelpreparation AT millerdavid openaccesscolonoscopyqualityindicatorsandpatientperceptionusingsplitdosebowelpreparation AT yodicemichael openaccesscolonoscopyqualityindicatorsandpatientperceptionusingsplitdosebowelpreparation AT wangkatie openaccesscolonoscopyqualityindicatorsandpatientperceptionusingsplitdosebowelpreparation AT balogunkhadijat openaccesscolonoscopyqualityindicatorsandpatientperceptionusingsplitdosebowelpreparation AT kabbachghassan openaccesscolonoscopyqualityindicatorsandpatientperceptionusingsplitdosebowelpreparation AT feustelpaul openaccesscolonoscopyqualityindicatorsandpatientperceptionusingsplitdosebowelpreparation AT tadrosmicheal openaccesscolonoscopyqualityindicatorsandpatientperceptionusingsplitdosebowelpreparation |