Cargando…

Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience

BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiotherapy is emerging practice, however with no randomized evidence so far to support it’s use. Additionally, patients with persistent PSA after prostatectomy may have aggressive disease and respond less well on standard salvage treatment. Herein we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murgic, Jure, Jaksic, Blanka, Prpic, Marin, Kust, Davor, Bahl, Amit, Budanec, Mirjana, Prgomet Secan, Angela, Franco, Pierfrancesco, Kruljac, Ivan, Spajic, Borislav, Babic, Nenad, Kruslin, Bozo, Zovak, Mario, Zubizarreta, Eduardo, Rosenblatt, Eduardo, Fröbe, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8115388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01808-3
_version_ 1783691212881920000
author Murgic, Jure
Jaksic, Blanka
Prpic, Marin
Kust, Davor
Bahl, Amit
Budanec, Mirjana
Prgomet Secan, Angela
Franco, Pierfrancesco
Kruljac, Ivan
Spajic, Borislav
Babic, Nenad
Kruslin, Bozo
Zovak, Mario
Zubizarreta, Eduardo
Rosenblatt, Eduardo
Fröbe, Ana
author_facet Murgic, Jure
Jaksic, Blanka
Prpic, Marin
Kust, Davor
Bahl, Amit
Budanec, Mirjana
Prgomet Secan, Angela
Franco, Pierfrancesco
Kruljac, Ivan
Spajic, Borislav
Babic, Nenad
Kruslin, Bozo
Zovak, Mario
Zubizarreta, Eduardo
Rosenblatt, Eduardo
Fröbe, Ana
author_sort Murgic, Jure
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiotherapy is emerging practice, however with no randomized evidence so far to support it’s use. Additionally, patients with persistent PSA after prostatectomy may have aggressive disease and respond less well on standard salvage treatment. Herein we report outcomes for conventionally fractionated (CFR) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFR) in patients with persistent postprostatectomy PSA who received salvage radiotherapy to prostate bed. METHODS: Single institution retrospective chart review was performed after Institutional Review Board approval. Between May 2012 and December 2016, 147 patients received salvage postprostatectomy radiotherapy. PSA failure-free and metastasis-free survival were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to test association of fractionation regimen and other clinical factors with treatment outcomes. Early and late toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients who had persistent PSA (≥ 0.1 ng/mL) after prostatectomy were identified. Median follow-up was 67 months (95% CI 58–106 months, range, 8–106 months). Thirty-six patients (52.2%) received CFR, 66 Gy in 33 fractions, 2 Gy per fraction, and 33 patients (47.8%) received HFR, 52.5 Gy in 20 fractions, 2.63 Gy per fraction. Forty-seven (68%) patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). 5-year PSA failure- and metastasis-free survival rate was 56.9% and 76.9%, respectively. Thirty patients (43%) experienced biochemical failure after salvage radiotherapy and 16 patients (23%) experienced metastatic relapse. Nine patients (13%) developed metastatic castration-resistant disease and died of advanced prostate cancer. Median PSA failure-free survival was 72 months (95% CI; 41–72 months), while median metastasis-free survival was not reached. Patients in HFR group were more likely to experience shorter PSA failure-free survival when compared to CFR group (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.0–4.6, p = 0.04). On univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with PSA failure-free survival were radiotherapy schedule (CFR vs HFR, HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0–4.6, p = 0.04), first postoperative PSA (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.0–1.04, p = 0.03), and concomitant ADT (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2–8.6, p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with PSA failure-free survival were radiotherapy schedule (HR 3.04, 95% CI 1.37–6.74, p = 0.006) and concomitant ADT (HR 4.41, 95% CI 1.6–12.12, p = 0.004). On univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with metastasis-free survival were the first postoperative PSA (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03–1.12, p = 0.002), seminal vesicle involvement (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.26–9.6,p = 0.02), extracapsular extension (HR 7.02, 95% CI 1.96–25.07, p = 0.003), and surgical margin status (HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.03–7.97, p = 0.04). The first postoperative PSA (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00–1.08, p = 0.02) and extracapsular extension (HR 4.24, 95% CI 1.08–16.55, p = 0.04) remained significantly associated with metastasis-free survival on multivariate analysis. Three patients in CFR arm (8%) experienced late genitourinary grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, commonly used hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen was associated with lower biochemical control compared to standard fractionation in patients with persistent PSA receiving salvage radiotherapy. Reason for this might be lower biological dose in HFR compared to CFR group. However, this observation is limited due to baseline imbalances in ADT use, ADT duration and Grade Group distribution between two radiotherapy cohorts. In patients with persistent PSA post-prostatectomy, the first postoperative PSA is an independent risk factor for treatment failure. Additional studies are needed to corroborate our observations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8115388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81153882021-05-13 Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience Murgic, Jure Jaksic, Blanka Prpic, Marin Kust, Davor Bahl, Amit Budanec, Mirjana Prgomet Secan, Angela Franco, Pierfrancesco Kruljac, Ivan Spajic, Borislav Babic, Nenad Kruslin, Bozo Zovak, Mario Zubizarreta, Eduardo Rosenblatt, Eduardo Fröbe, Ana Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiotherapy is emerging practice, however with no randomized evidence so far to support it’s use. Additionally, patients with persistent PSA after prostatectomy may have aggressive disease and respond less well on standard salvage treatment. Herein we report outcomes for conventionally fractionated (CFR) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFR) in patients with persistent postprostatectomy PSA who received salvage radiotherapy to prostate bed. METHODS: Single institution retrospective chart review was performed after Institutional Review Board approval. Between May 2012 and December 2016, 147 patients received salvage postprostatectomy radiotherapy. PSA failure-free and metastasis-free survival were calculated using Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to test association of fractionation regimen and other clinical factors with treatment outcomes. Early and late toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients who had persistent PSA (≥ 0.1 ng/mL) after prostatectomy were identified. Median follow-up was 67 months (95% CI 58–106 months, range, 8–106 months). Thirty-six patients (52.2%) received CFR, 66 Gy in 33 fractions, 2 Gy per fraction, and 33 patients (47.8%) received HFR, 52.5 Gy in 20 fractions, 2.63 Gy per fraction. Forty-seven (68%) patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). 5-year PSA failure- and metastasis-free survival rate was 56.9% and 76.9%, respectively. Thirty patients (43%) experienced biochemical failure after salvage radiotherapy and 16 patients (23%) experienced metastatic relapse. Nine patients (13%) developed metastatic castration-resistant disease and died of advanced prostate cancer. Median PSA failure-free survival was 72 months (95% CI; 41–72 months), while median metastasis-free survival was not reached. Patients in HFR group were more likely to experience shorter PSA failure-free survival when compared to CFR group (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.0–4.6, p = 0.04). On univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with PSA failure-free survival were radiotherapy schedule (CFR vs HFR, HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0–4.6, p = 0.04), first postoperative PSA (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.0–1.04, p = 0.03), and concomitant ADT (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2–8.6, p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with PSA failure-free survival were radiotherapy schedule (HR 3.04, 95% CI 1.37–6.74, p = 0.006) and concomitant ADT (HR 4.41, 95% CI 1.6–12.12, p = 0.004). On univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with metastasis-free survival were the first postoperative PSA (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03–1.12, p = 0.002), seminal vesicle involvement (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.26–9.6,p = 0.02), extracapsular extension (HR 7.02, 95% CI 1.96–25.07, p = 0.003), and surgical margin status (HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.03–7.97, p = 0.04). The first postoperative PSA (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00–1.08, p = 0.02) and extracapsular extension (HR 4.24, 95% CI 1.08–16.55, p = 0.04) remained significantly associated with metastasis-free survival on multivariate analysis. Three patients in CFR arm (8%) experienced late genitourinary grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, commonly used hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen was associated with lower biochemical control compared to standard fractionation in patients with persistent PSA receiving salvage radiotherapy. Reason for this might be lower biological dose in HFR compared to CFR group. However, this observation is limited due to baseline imbalances in ADT use, ADT duration and Grade Group distribution between two radiotherapy cohorts. In patients with persistent PSA post-prostatectomy, the first postoperative PSA is an independent risk factor for treatment failure. Additional studies are needed to corroborate our observations. BioMed Central 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8115388/ /pubmed/33980277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01808-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Murgic, Jure
Jaksic, Blanka
Prpic, Marin
Kust, Davor
Bahl, Amit
Budanec, Mirjana
Prgomet Secan, Angela
Franco, Pierfrancesco
Kruljac, Ivan
Spajic, Borislav
Babic, Nenad
Kruslin, Bozo
Zovak, Mario
Zubizarreta, Eduardo
Rosenblatt, Eduardo
Fröbe, Ana
Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience
title Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience
title_full Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience
title_fullStr Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience
title_short Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience
title_sort comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent psa: single institution experience
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8115388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01808-3
work_keys_str_mv AT murgicjure comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT jaksicblanka comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT prpicmarin comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT kustdavor comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT bahlamit comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT budanecmirjana comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT prgometsecanangela comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT francopierfrancesco comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT kruljacivan comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT spajicborislav comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT babicnenad comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT kruslinbozo comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT zovakmario comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT zubizarretaeduardo comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT rosenblatteduardo comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience
AT frobeana comparisonofhypofractionationandstandardfractionationforpostprostatectomysalvageradiotherapyinpatientswithpersistentpsasingleinstitutionexperience