Cargando…
Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses
Observational studies exploring whether there is a nonlinear effect of blood pressure on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are hindered by confounding. This limitation can be overcome by leveraging randomly allocated genetic variants in nonlinear Mendelian randomization analyses. Based on their asso...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8115430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33813844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16534 |
_version_ | 1783691220557496320 |
---|---|
author | Malik, Rainer Georgakis, Marios K. Vujkovic, Marijana Damrauer, Scott M. Elliott, Paul Karhunen, Ville Giontella, Alice Fava, Cristiano Hellwege, Jacklyn N. Shuey, Megan M. Edwards, Todd L. Rogne, Tormod Åsvold, Bjørn O. Brumpton, Ben M. Burgess, Stephen Dichgans, Martin Gill, Dipender |
author_facet | Malik, Rainer Georgakis, Marios K. Vujkovic, Marijana Damrauer, Scott M. Elliott, Paul Karhunen, Ville Giontella, Alice Fava, Cristiano Hellwege, Jacklyn N. Shuey, Megan M. Edwards, Todd L. Rogne, Tormod Åsvold, Bjørn O. Brumpton, Ben M. Burgess, Stephen Dichgans, Martin Gill, Dipender |
author_sort | Malik, Rainer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Observational studies exploring whether there is a nonlinear effect of blood pressure on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are hindered by confounding. This limitation can be overcome by leveraging randomly allocated genetic variants in nonlinear Mendelian randomization analyses. Based on their association with blood pressure traits in a genome-wide association study of 299 024 European ancestry individuals, we selected 253 genetic variants to proxy the effect of modifying systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Considering the outcomes of incident coronary artery disease, stroke and the combined outcome of CVD, linear and nonlinear Mendelian randomization analyses were performed on 255 714 European ancestry participants without a history of CVD or antihypertensive medication use. There was no evidence favoring nonlinear relationships of genetically proxied systolic and diastolic blood pressure with the cardiovascular outcomes over linear relationships. For every 10-mm Hg increase in genetically proxied systolic blood pressure, risk of incident CVD increased by 49% (hazard ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.38–1.61]), with similar estimates obtained for coronary artery disease (hazard ratio, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.38–1.63]) and stroke (hazard ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.22–1.70]). Genetically proxied blood pressure had a similar relationship with CVD in men and women. These findings provide evidence to support that even for individuals who do not have elevated blood pressure, public health interventions achieving persistent blood pressure reduction will be of considerable benefit in the primary prevention of CVD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8115430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81154302021-05-12 Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses Malik, Rainer Georgakis, Marios K. Vujkovic, Marijana Damrauer, Scott M. Elliott, Paul Karhunen, Ville Giontella, Alice Fava, Cristiano Hellwege, Jacklyn N. Shuey, Megan M. Edwards, Todd L. Rogne, Tormod Åsvold, Bjørn O. Brumpton, Ben M. Burgess, Stephen Dichgans, Martin Gill, Dipender Hypertension Original Articles Observational studies exploring whether there is a nonlinear effect of blood pressure on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are hindered by confounding. This limitation can be overcome by leveraging randomly allocated genetic variants in nonlinear Mendelian randomization analyses. Based on their association with blood pressure traits in a genome-wide association study of 299 024 European ancestry individuals, we selected 253 genetic variants to proxy the effect of modifying systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Considering the outcomes of incident coronary artery disease, stroke and the combined outcome of CVD, linear and nonlinear Mendelian randomization analyses were performed on 255 714 European ancestry participants without a history of CVD or antihypertensive medication use. There was no evidence favoring nonlinear relationships of genetically proxied systolic and diastolic blood pressure with the cardiovascular outcomes over linear relationships. For every 10-mm Hg increase in genetically proxied systolic blood pressure, risk of incident CVD increased by 49% (hazard ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.38–1.61]), with similar estimates obtained for coronary artery disease (hazard ratio, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.38–1.63]) and stroke (hazard ratio, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.22–1.70]). Genetically proxied blood pressure had a similar relationship with CVD in men and women. These findings provide evidence to support that even for individuals who do not have elevated blood pressure, public health interventions achieving persistent blood pressure reduction will be of considerable benefit in the primary prevention of CVD. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-05 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8115430/ /pubmed/33813844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16534 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Hypertension is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Malik, Rainer Georgakis, Marios K. Vujkovic, Marijana Damrauer, Scott M. Elliott, Paul Karhunen, Ville Giontella, Alice Fava, Cristiano Hellwege, Jacklyn N. Shuey, Megan M. Edwards, Todd L. Rogne, Tormod Åsvold, Bjørn O. Brumpton, Ben M. Burgess, Stephen Dichgans, Martin Gill, Dipender Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses |
title | Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses |
title_full | Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses |
title_fullStr | Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses |
title_short | Relationship Between Blood Pressure and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Linear and Nonlinear Mendelian Randomization Analyses |
title_sort | relationship between blood pressure and incident cardiovascular disease: linear and nonlinear mendelian randomization analyses |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8115430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33813844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16534 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malikrainer relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT georgakismariosk relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT vujkovicmarijana relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT damrauerscottm relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT elliottpaul relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT karhunenville relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT giontellaalice relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT favacristiano relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT hellwegejacklynn relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT shueymeganm relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT edwardstoddl relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT rognetormod relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT asvoldbjørno relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT brumptonbenm relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT burgessstephen relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT dichgansmartin relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses AT gilldipender relationshipbetweenbloodpressureandincidentcardiovasculardiseaselinearandnonlinearmendelianrandomizationanalyses |