Cargando…

Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE: Common surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) include microvascular decompression (MVD) and percutaneous procedures (glycerol rhizolysis; thermocoagulation; and balloon compression). Although the efficacy of each procedure has been documented, direct comparisons of their relati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noorani, Imran, Lodge, Amanda, Durnford, Andrew, Vajramani, Girish, Sparrow, Owen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33751217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04793-4
_version_ 1783691366312706048
author Noorani, Imran
Lodge, Amanda
Durnford, Andrew
Vajramani, Girish
Sparrow, Owen
author_facet Noorani, Imran
Lodge, Amanda
Durnford, Andrew
Vajramani, Girish
Sparrow, Owen
author_sort Noorani, Imran
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Common surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) include microvascular decompression (MVD) and percutaneous procedures (glycerol rhizolysis; thermocoagulation; and balloon compression). Although the efficacy of each procedure has been documented, direct comparisons of their relative efficacies for TN are lacking. We aimed to directly compare long-term outcomes after first-time MVD with percutaneous surgery in primary (idiopathic and classical) TN and identify predictors of outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 185 patients undergoing MVD and 129 undergoing percutaneous surgery. Procedures were performed by one of two neurosurgeons in a single centre; an independent observer collected long-term follow-up data by interviews, using the same outcome measures for all procedures. RESULTS: MVD patients were younger than those undergoing percutaneous surgery (P <.001). MVD provided superior initial pain relief (P <.001): 87.0% had Barrow Neurological Institute class I or II pain scores after MVD compared with 67.2% after percutaneous surgery. The complication rate for percutaneous procedures was 35.7% and for MVDs was 24.9% (P =.04), including minor and transient complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that MVD provided longer pain relief than percutaneous procedures (P <.001); 25% of patients had recurrence at 96 months following MVD compared with 12 months after percutaneous surgery. Subgroup analysis showed that balloon compression provided more durable relief amongst percutaneous procedures. Multivariate analysis revealed that post-operative numbness and age were prognostic factors for percutaneous procedures (P =.03 and .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MVD provides better initial pain relief and longer durability of relief than percutaneous surgery, although carrying a small risk of major complications. Amongst percutaneous procedures, balloon compression gave the most durable relief from pain. Older age and post-operative numbness were predictors of good outcome from percutaneous surgery. These results can help clinicians to counsel patients with primary TN on neurosurgical treatment selection for pain relief. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-04793-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8116280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81162802021-05-26 Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors Noorani, Imran Lodge, Amanda Durnford, Andrew Vajramani, Girish Sparrow, Owen Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Functional Neurosurgery - Pain OBJECTIVE: Common surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) include microvascular decompression (MVD) and percutaneous procedures (glycerol rhizolysis; thermocoagulation; and balloon compression). Although the efficacy of each procedure has been documented, direct comparisons of their relative efficacies for TN are lacking. We aimed to directly compare long-term outcomes after first-time MVD with percutaneous surgery in primary (idiopathic and classical) TN and identify predictors of outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 185 patients undergoing MVD and 129 undergoing percutaneous surgery. Procedures were performed by one of two neurosurgeons in a single centre; an independent observer collected long-term follow-up data by interviews, using the same outcome measures for all procedures. RESULTS: MVD patients were younger than those undergoing percutaneous surgery (P <.001). MVD provided superior initial pain relief (P <.001): 87.0% had Barrow Neurological Institute class I or II pain scores after MVD compared with 67.2% after percutaneous surgery. The complication rate for percutaneous procedures was 35.7% and for MVDs was 24.9% (P =.04), including minor and transient complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that MVD provided longer pain relief than percutaneous procedures (P <.001); 25% of patients had recurrence at 96 months following MVD compared with 12 months after percutaneous surgery. Subgroup analysis showed that balloon compression provided more durable relief amongst percutaneous procedures. Multivariate analysis revealed that post-operative numbness and age were prognostic factors for percutaneous procedures (P =.03 and .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MVD provides better initial pain relief and longer durability of relief than percutaneous surgery, although carrying a small risk of major complications. Amongst percutaneous procedures, balloon compression gave the most durable relief from pain. Older age and post-operative numbness were predictors of good outcome from percutaneous surgery. These results can help clinicians to counsel patients with primary TN on neurosurgical treatment selection for pain relief. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-04793-4. Springer Vienna 2021-03-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8116280/ /pubmed/33751217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04793-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article - Functional Neurosurgery - Pain
Noorani, Imran
Lodge, Amanda
Durnford, Andrew
Vajramani, Girish
Sparrow, Owen
Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors
title Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors
title_full Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors
title_fullStr Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors
title_short Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors
title_sort comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors
topic Original Article - Functional Neurosurgery - Pain
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33751217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04793-4
work_keys_str_mv AT nooraniimran comparisonoffirsttimemicrovasculardecompressionwithpercutaneoussurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgialongtermoutcomesandprognosticfactors
AT lodgeamanda comparisonoffirsttimemicrovasculardecompressionwithpercutaneoussurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgialongtermoutcomesandprognosticfactors
AT durnfordandrew comparisonoffirsttimemicrovasculardecompressionwithpercutaneoussurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgialongtermoutcomesandprognosticfactors
AT vajramanigirish comparisonoffirsttimemicrovasculardecompressionwithpercutaneoussurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgialongtermoutcomesandprognosticfactors
AT sparrowowen comparisonoffirsttimemicrovasculardecompressionwithpercutaneoussurgeryfortrigeminalneuralgialongtermoutcomesandprognosticfactors