Cargando…
Arm activity measure (ArmA): psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version
BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Outcomes Measure (PROM) are commonly used in research and essential to understand the patient experience when receiving treatment. Arm Activity Measure (ArmA) is a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire for assessing passive (section A) and active (section B) real-...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33982227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00310-4 |
_version_ | 1783691401232384000 |
---|---|
author | Ramström, Therese Bunketorp-Käll, Lina Wangdell, Johanna |
author_facet | Ramström, Therese Bunketorp-Käll, Lina Wangdell, Johanna |
author_sort | Ramström, Therese |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Outcomes Measure (PROM) are commonly used in research and essential to understand the patient experience when receiving treatment. Arm Activity Measure (ArmA) is a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire for assessing passive (section A) and active (section B) real-life arm function in patients with disabling spasticity. The original English version of ArmA has been psychometrically tested and translated into Thai. AIMS: Translate and cross-culturally adapt ArmA to Swedish language and context. Further, to evaluate the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the Swedish version of the questionnaire (ArmA-S) in patients with disabling upper limb spasticity caused by injuries to the central nervous system (CNS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: ArmA was translated and cross-culturally adapted according to established guidelines. Validity and reliability were evaluated in 61 patients with disabling spasticity. Face and content validity was evaluated by expert opinions from clinicians and feedback from patients with upper limb spasticity. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability was assessed using the quadratic weighted kappa. RESULTS: ArmA-S was shown to be clinically feasible, with good face and content validity and no floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency of ArmA-S was high and equivalent to ArmA; with Chronbach´s alpha coefficients values of 0.94 and 0.93 for section A and B, respectively. Test-retest reliability was good, with kappa values of 0.86 and 0.83 for section A and B, respectively. Some layout modifications of ArmA-S were made to further increase the user-friendliness, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. CONCLUSION: ArmA-S was shown to be a reliable and valid self-report questionnaire for use in clinical practice and research to assess improvements in passive and active upper limb function in patients with disabling spasticity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00310-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8116475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81164752021-05-14 Arm activity measure (ArmA): psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version Ramström, Therese Bunketorp-Käll, Lina Wangdell, Johanna J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Outcomes Measure (PROM) are commonly used in research and essential to understand the patient experience when receiving treatment. Arm Activity Measure (ArmA) is a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire for assessing passive (section A) and active (section B) real-life arm function in patients with disabling spasticity. The original English version of ArmA has been psychometrically tested and translated into Thai. AIMS: Translate and cross-culturally adapt ArmA to Swedish language and context. Further, to evaluate the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the Swedish version of the questionnaire (ArmA-S) in patients with disabling upper limb spasticity caused by injuries to the central nervous system (CNS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: ArmA was translated and cross-culturally adapted according to established guidelines. Validity and reliability were evaluated in 61 patients with disabling spasticity. Face and content validity was evaluated by expert opinions from clinicians and feedback from patients with upper limb spasticity. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability was assessed using the quadratic weighted kappa. RESULTS: ArmA-S was shown to be clinically feasible, with good face and content validity and no floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency of ArmA-S was high and equivalent to ArmA; with Chronbach´s alpha coefficients values of 0.94 and 0.93 for section A and B, respectively. Test-retest reliability was good, with kappa values of 0.86 and 0.83 for section A and B, respectively. Some layout modifications of ArmA-S were made to further increase the user-friendliness, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. CONCLUSION: ArmA-S was shown to be a reliable and valid self-report questionnaire for use in clinical practice and research to assess improvements in passive and active upper limb function in patients with disabling spasticity. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00310-4. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8116475/ /pubmed/33982227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00310-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Ramström, Therese Bunketorp-Käll, Lina Wangdell, Johanna Arm activity measure (ArmA): psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version |
title | Arm activity measure (ArmA): psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version |
title_full | Arm activity measure (ArmA): psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version |
title_fullStr | Arm activity measure (ArmA): psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version |
title_full_unstemmed | Arm activity measure (ArmA): psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version |
title_short | Arm activity measure (ArmA): psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version |
title_sort | arm activity measure (arma): psychometric evaluation of the swedish version |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33982227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00310-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramstromtherese armactivitymeasurearmapsychometricevaluationoftheswedishversion AT bunketorpkalllina armactivitymeasurearmapsychometricevaluationoftheswedishversion AT wangdelljohanna armactivitymeasurearmapsychometricevaluationoftheswedishversion |