Cargando…

Visuomotor Activation of Inhibition-Processing in Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Magnetoencephalography Study

Background: Response inhibition engages the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuit, which has been implicated in children, and youth with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). This study explored whether CSTC engagement during response inhibition, measured using magnetoencephalography (MEG),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishat, Eman, Dockstader, Colleen, Wheeler, Anne L., Tan, Thomas, Anderson, John A. E., Mendlowitz, Sandra, Mabbott, Donald J., Arnold, Paul D., Ameis, Stephanie H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995145
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.632736
_version_ 1783691413590900736
author Nishat, Eman
Dockstader, Colleen
Wheeler, Anne L.
Tan, Thomas
Anderson, John A. E.
Mendlowitz, Sandra
Mabbott, Donald J.
Arnold, Paul D.
Ameis, Stephanie H.
author_facet Nishat, Eman
Dockstader, Colleen
Wheeler, Anne L.
Tan, Thomas
Anderson, John A. E.
Mendlowitz, Sandra
Mabbott, Donald J.
Arnold, Paul D.
Ameis, Stephanie H.
author_sort Nishat, Eman
collection PubMed
description Background: Response inhibition engages the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuit, which has been implicated in children, and youth with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). This study explored whether CSTC engagement during response inhibition, measured using magnetoencephalography (MEG), differed in a sample of medication-naïve youth with OCD, compared to typically developing controls (TDC). Methods: Data was analyzed in 17 medication-naïve children and youth with OCD (11.7 ± 2.2 SD years) and 13 TDC (12.6 ± 2.2 SD years). MEG was used to localize and characterize neural activity during a Go/No-Go task. Task performance on Go/No-Go conditions and regional differences in amplitude of activity during Go and No-Go condition between OCD vs. TDC were examined using two-sample t-tests. Post-hoc analysis with Bayesian t-tests was used to estimate the certainty of outcomes. Results: No differences in Go/No-Go performance were found between OCD and TDC groups. In response to the visual cue presented during the Go condition, participants with OCD showed significantly increased amplitude of activity in the primary motor (MI) cortex compared to TDC. In addition, significantly reduced amplitude of PCu was found following successful stopping to No-Go cues in OCD vs. TDC during No-Go task performance. Bayesian t-tests indicated high probability and large effect sizes for the differences in MI and PCu amplitude found between groups. Conclusion: Our preliminary study in a small medication-naïve sample extends previous work indicating intact response inhibition in pediatric OCD. While altered neural response in the current study was found during response inhibition performance in OCD, differences localized to regions outside of the CSTC. Our findings suggest that additional imaging research in medication-naïve samples is needed to clarify regional differences associated with OCD vs. influenced by medication effects, and suggest that MEG may be sensitive to detecting such differences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8116532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81165322021-05-14 Visuomotor Activation of Inhibition-Processing in Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Magnetoencephalography Study Nishat, Eman Dockstader, Colleen Wheeler, Anne L. Tan, Thomas Anderson, John A. E. Mendlowitz, Sandra Mabbott, Donald J. Arnold, Paul D. Ameis, Stephanie H. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Response inhibition engages the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuit, which has been implicated in children, and youth with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). This study explored whether CSTC engagement during response inhibition, measured using magnetoencephalography (MEG), differed in a sample of medication-naïve youth with OCD, compared to typically developing controls (TDC). Methods: Data was analyzed in 17 medication-naïve children and youth with OCD (11.7 ± 2.2 SD years) and 13 TDC (12.6 ± 2.2 SD years). MEG was used to localize and characterize neural activity during a Go/No-Go task. Task performance on Go/No-Go conditions and regional differences in amplitude of activity during Go and No-Go condition between OCD vs. TDC were examined using two-sample t-tests. Post-hoc analysis with Bayesian t-tests was used to estimate the certainty of outcomes. Results: No differences in Go/No-Go performance were found between OCD and TDC groups. In response to the visual cue presented during the Go condition, participants with OCD showed significantly increased amplitude of activity in the primary motor (MI) cortex compared to TDC. In addition, significantly reduced amplitude of PCu was found following successful stopping to No-Go cues in OCD vs. TDC during No-Go task performance. Bayesian t-tests indicated high probability and large effect sizes for the differences in MI and PCu amplitude found between groups. Conclusion: Our preliminary study in a small medication-naïve sample extends previous work indicating intact response inhibition in pediatric OCD. While altered neural response in the current study was found during response inhibition performance in OCD, differences localized to regions outside of the CSTC. Our findings suggest that additional imaging research in medication-naïve samples is needed to clarify regional differences associated with OCD vs. influenced by medication effects, and suggest that MEG may be sensitive to detecting such differences. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8116532/ /pubmed/33995145 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.632736 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nishat, Dockstader, Wheeler, Tan, Anderson, Mendlowitz, Mabbott, Arnold and Ameis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Nishat, Eman
Dockstader, Colleen
Wheeler, Anne L.
Tan, Thomas
Anderson, John A. E.
Mendlowitz, Sandra
Mabbott, Donald J.
Arnold, Paul D.
Ameis, Stephanie H.
Visuomotor Activation of Inhibition-Processing in Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title Visuomotor Activation of Inhibition-Processing in Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_full Visuomotor Activation of Inhibition-Processing in Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_fullStr Visuomotor Activation of Inhibition-Processing in Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_full_unstemmed Visuomotor Activation of Inhibition-Processing in Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_short Visuomotor Activation of Inhibition-Processing in Pediatric Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Magnetoencephalography Study
title_sort visuomotor activation of inhibition-processing in pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder: a magnetoencephalography study
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33995145
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.632736
work_keys_str_mv AT nishateman visuomotoractivationofinhibitionprocessinginpediatricobsessivecompulsivedisorderamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT dockstadercolleen visuomotoractivationofinhibitionprocessinginpediatricobsessivecompulsivedisorderamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT wheelerannel visuomotoractivationofinhibitionprocessinginpediatricobsessivecompulsivedisorderamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT tanthomas visuomotoractivationofinhibitionprocessinginpediatricobsessivecompulsivedisorderamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT andersonjohnae visuomotoractivationofinhibitionprocessinginpediatricobsessivecompulsivedisorderamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT mendlowitzsandra visuomotoractivationofinhibitionprocessinginpediatricobsessivecompulsivedisorderamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT mabbottdonaldj visuomotoractivationofinhibitionprocessinginpediatricobsessivecompulsivedisorderamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT arnoldpauld visuomotoractivationofinhibitionprocessinginpediatricobsessivecompulsivedisorderamagnetoencephalographystudy
AT ameisstephanieh visuomotoractivationofinhibitionprocessinginpediatricobsessivecompulsivedisorderamagnetoencephalographystudy