Cargando…
Lox’d in translation: contradictions in the nomenclature surrounding common lox-site mutants and their implications in experiments
The Cre-Lox system is a highly versatile and powerful DNA recombinase mechanism, mainly used in genetic engineering to insert or remove desired DNA sequences. It is widely utilized across multiple fields of biology, with applications ranging from plants, to mammals, to microbes. A key feature of thi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Microbiology Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000997 |
_version_ | 1783691468543623168 |
---|---|
author | Shaw, Daniel Serrano, Luis Lluch-Senar, Maria |
author_facet | Shaw, Daniel Serrano, Luis Lluch-Senar, Maria |
author_sort | Shaw, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Cre-Lox system is a highly versatile and powerful DNA recombinase mechanism, mainly used in genetic engineering to insert or remove desired DNA sequences. It is widely utilized across multiple fields of biology, with applications ranging from plants, to mammals, to microbes. A key feature of this system is its ability to allow recombination between mutant lox sites. Two of the most commonly used mutant sites are named lox66 and lox71, which recombine to create a functionally inactive double mutant lox72 site. However, a large portion of the published literature has incorrectly annotated these mutant lox sites, which in turn can lead to difficulties in replication of methods, design of proper vectors and confusion over the proper nomenclature. Here, we demonstrate common errors in annotations, the impacts they can have on experimental viability, and a standardized naming convention. We also show an example of how this incorrect annotation can induce toxic effects in bacteria that lack optimal DNA repair systems, exemplified by Mycoplasma pneumoniae . |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8116776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Microbiology Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81167762021-05-14 Lox’d in translation: contradictions in the nomenclature surrounding common lox-site mutants and their implications in experiments Shaw, Daniel Serrano, Luis Lluch-Senar, Maria Microbiology (Reading) Research Article The Cre-Lox system is a highly versatile and powerful DNA recombinase mechanism, mainly used in genetic engineering to insert or remove desired DNA sequences. It is widely utilized across multiple fields of biology, with applications ranging from plants, to mammals, to microbes. A key feature of this system is its ability to allow recombination between mutant lox sites. Two of the most commonly used mutant sites are named lox66 and lox71, which recombine to create a functionally inactive double mutant lox72 site. However, a large portion of the published literature has incorrectly annotated these mutant lox sites, which in turn can lead to difficulties in replication of methods, design of proper vectors and confusion over the proper nomenclature. Here, we demonstrate common errors in annotations, the impacts they can have on experimental viability, and a standardized naming convention. We also show an example of how this incorrect annotation can induce toxic effects in bacteria that lack optimal DNA repair systems, exemplified by Mycoplasma pneumoniae . Microbiology Society 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8116776/ /pubmed/33284099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000997 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shaw, Daniel Serrano, Luis Lluch-Senar, Maria Lox’d in translation: contradictions in the nomenclature surrounding common lox-site mutants and their implications in experiments |
title | Lox’d in translation: contradictions in the nomenclature surrounding common lox-site mutants and their implications in experiments |
title_full | Lox’d in translation: contradictions in the nomenclature surrounding common lox-site mutants and their implications in experiments |
title_fullStr | Lox’d in translation: contradictions in the nomenclature surrounding common lox-site mutants and their implications in experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Lox’d in translation: contradictions in the nomenclature surrounding common lox-site mutants and their implications in experiments |
title_short | Lox’d in translation: contradictions in the nomenclature surrounding common lox-site mutants and their implications in experiments |
title_sort | lox’d in translation: contradictions in the nomenclature surrounding common lox-site mutants and their implications in experiments |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33284099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shawdaniel loxdintranslationcontradictionsinthenomenclaturesurroundingcommonloxsitemutantsandtheirimplicationsinexperiments AT serranoluis loxdintranslationcontradictionsinthenomenclaturesurroundingcommonloxsitemutantsandtheirimplicationsinexperiments AT lluchsenarmaria loxdintranslationcontradictionsinthenomenclaturesurroundingcommonloxsitemutantsandtheirimplicationsinexperiments |