Cargando…
Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go?
BACKGROUND: Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) was introduced to minimise the risk of aspiration of gastric contents during emergency tracheal intubation. It consisted of induction with the use of thiopentone and suxamethonium with the application of cricoid pressure. This narrative review describes how...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00883-5 |
_version_ | 1783691479059791872 |
---|---|
author | Avery, Pascale Morton, Sarah Raitt, James Lossius, Hans Morten Lockey, David |
author_facet | Avery, Pascale Morton, Sarah Raitt, James Lossius, Hans Morten Lockey, David |
author_sort | Avery, Pascale |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) was introduced to minimise the risk of aspiration of gastric contents during emergency tracheal intubation. It consisted of induction with the use of thiopentone and suxamethonium with the application of cricoid pressure. This narrative review describes how traditional RSI has been modified in the UK and elsewhere, aiming to deliver safe and effective emergency anaesthesia outside the operating room environment. Most of the key aspects of traditional RSI – training, technique, drugs and equipment have been challenged and often significantly changed since the procedure was first described. Alterations have been made to improve the safety and quality of the intervention while retaining the principles of rapidly securing a definitive airway and avoiding gastric aspiration. RSI is no longer achieved by an anaesthetist alone and can be delivered safely in a variety of settings, including in the pre-hospital environment. CONCLUSION: The conduct of RSI in current emergency practice is far removed from the original descriptions of the procedure. Despite this, the principles – rapid delivery of a definitive airway and avoiding aspiration, are still highly relevant and the indications for RSI remain relatively unchanged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8116824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81168242021-05-13 Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go? Avery, Pascale Morton, Sarah Raitt, James Lossius, Hans Morten Lockey, David Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Review BACKGROUND: Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) was introduced to minimise the risk of aspiration of gastric contents during emergency tracheal intubation. It consisted of induction with the use of thiopentone and suxamethonium with the application of cricoid pressure. This narrative review describes how traditional RSI has been modified in the UK and elsewhere, aiming to deliver safe and effective emergency anaesthesia outside the operating room environment. Most of the key aspects of traditional RSI – training, technique, drugs and equipment have been challenged and often significantly changed since the procedure was first described. Alterations have been made to improve the safety and quality of the intervention while retaining the principles of rapidly securing a definitive airway and avoiding gastric aspiration. RSI is no longer achieved by an anaesthetist alone and can be delivered safely in a variety of settings, including in the pre-hospital environment. CONCLUSION: The conduct of RSI in current emergency practice is far removed from the original descriptions of the procedure. Despite this, the principles – rapid delivery of a definitive airway and avoiding aspiration, are still highly relevant and the indications for RSI remain relatively unchanged. BioMed Central 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8116824/ /pubmed/33985541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00883-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Avery, Pascale Morton, Sarah Raitt, James Lossius, Hans Morten Lockey, David Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go? |
title | Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go? |
title_full | Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go? |
title_fullStr | Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go? |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go? |
title_short | Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go? |
title_sort | rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00883-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT averypascale rapidsequenceinductionwheredidtheconsensusgo AT mortonsarah rapidsequenceinductionwheredidtheconsensusgo AT raittjames rapidsequenceinductionwheredidtheconsensusgo AT lossiushansmorten rapidsequenceinductionwheredidtheconsensusgo AT lockeydavid rapidsequenceinductionwheredidtheconsensusgo |