Cargando…
The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation
As digital health technologies (DHT) have been embraced as a ‘panacea’ for health care systems, they have evolved from a buzzword into a high priority objective for health policy across the globe. In the realm of quality and safety standards for medical devices, the US Food and Drug Administration (...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Palgrave Macmillan UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00232-w |
_version_ | 1783691479802183680 |
---|---|
author | Lievevrouw, Elisa Marelli, Luca Van Hoyweghen, Ine |
author_facet | Lievevrouw, Elisa Marelli, Luca Van Hoyweghen, Ine |
author_sort | Lievevrouw, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | As digital health technologies (DHT) have been embraced as a ‘panacea’ for health care systems, they have evolved from a buzzword into a high priority objective for health policy across the globe. In the realm of quality and safety standards for medical devices, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been a frontrunner in adapting its regulatory framework to DHT. However, despite the utmost relevance of quality and safety standards and their role for sustaining the innovation pathway of DHT, their actual making has not yet been subjected to in-depth social-science scrutiny. Drawing on the conceptual repertoires of Science and Technology Studies (STS), this article investigates how digital health evolved from a buzzword into an ‘object of government’, or gained material meaning and transformed into a regulatable object, by charting the standard-making process of FDA’s medical digital health policy between 2008 and 2018. From this, we reflect on the mutually sustaining dynamics between technological and organizational innovation, as the FDA’s attempts to standardize medical DHT not only shaped the lifestyle/medical boundary for DHT. It also led to significant reconfigurations within the FDA itself, while fostering a broader shift toward the uptake of alternative forms of evidence in regulatory science. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8116827 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81168272021-05-13 The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation Lievevrouw, Elisa Marelli, Luca Van Hoyweghen, Ine Biosocieties Original Article As digital health technologies (DHT) have been embraced as a ‘panacea’ for health care systems, they have evolved from a buzzword into a high priority objective for health policy across the globe. In the realm of quality and safety standards for medical devices, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been a frontrunner in adapting its regulatory framework to DHT. However, despite the utmost relevance of quality and safety standards and their role for sustaining the innovation pathway of DHT, their actual making has not yet been subjected to in-depth social-science scrutiny. Drawing on the conceptual repertoires of Science and Technology Studies (STS), this article investigates how digital health evolved from a buzzword into an ‘object of government’, or gained material meaning and transformed into a regulatable object, by charting the standard-making process of FDA’s medical digital health policy between 2008 and 2018. From this, we reflect on the mutually sustaining dynamics between technological and organizational innovation, as the FDA’s attempts to standardize medical DHT not only shaped the lifestyle/medical boundary for DHT. It also led to significant reconfigurations within the FDA itself, while fostering a broader shift toward the uptake of alternative forms of evidence in regulatory science. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2021-05-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8116827/ /pubmed/34002115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00232-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lievevrouw, Elisa Marelli, Luca Van Hoyweghen, Ine The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation |
title | The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation |
title_full | The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation |
title_fullStr | The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation |
title_full_unstemmed | The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation |
title_short | The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation |
title_sort | fda’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116827/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00232-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lievevrouwelisa thefdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation AT marelliluca thefdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation AT vanhoyweghenine thefdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation AT lievevrouwelisa fdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation AT marelliluca fdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation AT vanhoyweghenine fdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation |