Cargando…

The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation

As digital health technologies (DHT) have been embraced as a ‘panacea’ for health care systems, they have evolved from a buzzword into a high priority objective for health policy across the globe. In the realm of quality and safety standards for medical devices, the US Food and Drug Administration (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lievevrouw, Elisa, Marelli, Luca, Van Hoyweghen, Ine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00232-w
_version_ 1783691479802183680
author Lievevrouw, Elisa
Marelli, Luca
Van Hoyweghen, Ine
author_facet Lievevrouw, Elisa
Marelli, Luca
Van Hoyweghen, Ine
author_sort Lievevrouw, Elisa
collection PubMed
description As digital health technologies (DHT) have been embraced as a ‘panacea’ for health care systems, they have evolved from a buzzword into a high priority objective for health policy across the globe. In the realm of quality and safety standards for medical devices, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been a frontrunner in adapting its regulatory framework to DHT. However, despite the utmost relevance of quality and safety standards and their role for sustaining the innovation pathway of DHT, their actual making has not yet been subjected to in-depth social-science scrutiny. Drawing on the conceptual repertoires of Science and Technology Studies (STS), this article investigates how digital health evolved from a buzzword into an ‘object of government’, or gained material meaning and transformed into a regulatable object, by charting the standard-making process of FDA’s medical digital health policy between 2008 and 2018. From this, we reflect on the mutually sustaining dynamics between technological and organizational innovation, as the FDA’s attempts to standardize medical DHT not only shaped the lifestyle/medical boundary for DHT. It also led to significant reconfigurations within the FDA itself, while fostering a broader shift toward the uptake of alternative forms of evidence in regulatory science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8116827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Palgrave Macmillan UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81168272021-05-13 The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation Lievevrouw, Elisa Marelli, Luca Van Hoyweghen, Ine Biosocieties Original Article As digital health technologies (DHT) have been embraced as a ‘panacea’ for health care systems, they have evolved from a buzzword into a high priority objective for health policy across the globe. In the realm of quality and safety standards for medical devices, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been a frontrunner in adapting its regulatory framework to DHT. However, despite the utmost relevance of quality and safety standards and their role for sustaining the innovation pathway of DHT, their actual making has not yet been subjected to in-depth social-science scrutiny. Drawing on the conceptual repertoires of Science and Technology Studies (STS), this article investigates how digital health evolved from a buzzword into an ‘object of government’, or gained material meaning and transformed into a regulatable object, by charting the standard-making process of FDA’s medical digital health policy between 2008 and 2018. From this, we reflect on the mutually sustaining dynamics between technological and organizational innovation, as the FDA’s attempts to standardize medical DHT not only shaped the lifestyle/medical boundary for DHT. It also led to significant reconfigurations within the FDA itself, while fostering a broader shift toward the uptake of alternative forms of evidence in regulatory science. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2021-05-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8116827/ /pubmed/34002115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00232-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lievevrouw, Elisa
Marelli, Luca
Van Hoyweghen, Ine
The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation
title The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation
title_full The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation
title_fullStr The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation
title_full_unstemmed The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation
title_short The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation
title_sort fda’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies: co-producing technological and organizational innovation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00232-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lievevrouwelisa thefdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation
AT marelliluca thefdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation
AT vanhoyweghenine thefdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation
AT lievevrouwelisa fdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation
AT marelliluca fdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation
AT vanhoyweghenine fdasstandardmakingprocessformedicaldigitalhealthtechnologiescoproducingtechnologicalandorganizationalinnovation