Cargando…

Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond

The behavior and performance of steers on pasture regarding water availability in troughs or in ponds were compared. Eight paddocks were randomly allocated to one treatment: POND (~30 m of diameter) or TROUGH (water trough, 120 cm diameter and 60 cm high and 500 L capacity). Eight groups of six beef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bica, Gabriela Schenato, Pinheiro Machado Filho, Luiz Carlos, Teixeira, Dayane Lemos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33996957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.616904
_version_ 1783691505865588736
author Bica, Gabriela Schenato
Pinheiro Machado Filho, Luiz Carlos
Teixeira, Dayane Lemos
author_facet Bica, Gabriela Schenato
Pinheiro Machado Filho, Luiz Carlos
Teixeira, Dayane Lemos
author_sort Bica, Gabriela Schenato
collection PubMed
description The behavior and performance of steers on pasture regarding water availability in troughs or in ponds were compared. Eight paddocks were randomly allocated to one treatment: POND (~30 m of diameter) or TROUGH (water trough, 120 cm diameter and 60 cm high and 500 L capacity). Eight groups of six beef steers were randomly assigned to one of the paddocks. The first 10 days were considered for animal habituation. Animals were individually weighed (days 0, 30, 60, and 90). Beginning in the day after each weighing on days 30 (Month 1), 60 (Month 2), and 90 (Month 3), behavior and animal distribution in the paddock were recorded by direct visual observation in three periods of 4 consecutive days. Water temperature and fecal and herbage DM were also recorded in these periods. Water intake was measured during 16 random days in the troughs. Data were analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed Models, with treatment and period as fixed effects. TROUGH steers gained more weight (0.44 vs. 0.34 kg/day/animal; P ≤ 0.007) during the experiment and were heavier than the others at the end of the study (P ≤ 0.05). POND steers spent more time drinking water, but TROUGH steers increased the number of drinking events throughout the study (P ≤ 0.05), suggesting an adaptation for the new type of water source. Both treatments increased grazing time throughout the study, but not ruminating time (P ≤ 0.05). Walking time differed between treatments in all periods of behavior observation (P ≤ 0.05). Events of animal licking and ingesting salt of POND steers reduced throughout the study (P ≤ 0.05). The number of drinking events of TROUGH steers increased throughout the study, and drinking events were longer for POND steers than TROUGH steers (P ≤ 0.05). TROUGH steers spent more time on pasture on Month 2 (P ≤ 0.05). Period collection did not affect the water intake of TROUGH treatment (P > 0.05). This study demonstrates that water available in troughs rather than ponds for steers on pasture has positive effects on their weight gain and affects cattle behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8116948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81169482021-05-14 Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond Bica, Gabriela Schenato Pinheiro Machado Filho, Luiz Carlos Teixeira, Dayane Lemos Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The behavior and performance of steers on pasture regarding water availability in troughs or in ponds were compared. Eight paddocks were randomly allocated to one treatment: POND (~30 m of diameter) or TROUGH (water trough, 120 cm diameter and 60 cm high and 500 L capacity). Eight groups of six beef steers were randomly assigned to one of the paddocks. The first 10 days were considered for animal habituation. Animals were individually weighed (days 0, 30, 60, and 90). Beginning in the day after each weighing on days 30 (Month 1), 60 (Month 2), and 90 (Month 3), behavior and animal distribution in the paddock were recorded by direct visual observation in three periods of 4 consecutive days. Water temperature and fecal and herbage DM were also recorded in these periods. Water intake was measured during 16 random days in the troughs. Data were analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed Models, with treatment and period as fixed effects. TROUGH steers gained more weight (0.44 vs. 0.34 kg/day/animal; P ≤ 0.007) during the experiment and were heavier than the others at the end of the study (P ≤ 0.05). POND steers spent more time drinking water, but TROUGH steers increased the number of drinking events throughout the study (P ≤ 0.05), suggesting an adaptation for the new type of water source. Both treatments increased grazing time throughout the study, but not ruminating time (P ≤ 0.05). Walking time differed between treatments in all periods of behavior observation (P ≤ 0.05). Events of animal licking and ingesting salt of POND steers reduced throughout the study (P ≤ 0.05). The number of drinking events of TROUGH steers increased throughout the study, and drinking events were longer for POND steers than TROUGH steers (P ≤ 0.05). TROUGH steers spent more time on pasture on Month 2 (P ≤ 0.05). Period collection did not affect the water intake of TROUGH treatment (P > 0.05). This study demonstrates that water available in troughs rather than ponds for steers on pasture has positive effects on their weight gain and affects cattle behavior. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8116948/ /pubmed/33996957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.616904 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bica, Pinheiro Machado Filho and Teixeira. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Bica, Gabriela Schenato
Pinheiro Machado Filho, Luiz Carlos
Teixeira, Dayane Lemos
Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond
title Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond
title_full Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond
title_fullStr Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond
title_full_unstemmed Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond
title_short Beef Cattle on Pasture Have Better Performance When Supplied With Water Trough Than Pond
title_sort beef cattle on pasture have better performance when supplied with water trough than pond
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8116948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33996957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.616904
work_keys_str_mv AT bicagabrielaschenato beefcattleonpasturehavebetterperformancewhensuppliedwithwatertroughthanpond
AT pinheiromachadofilholuizcarlos beefcattleonpasturehavebetterperformancewhensuppliedwithwatertroughthanpond
AT teixeiradayanelemos beefcattleonpasturehavebetterperformancewhensuppliedwithwatertroughthanpond