Cargando…
Comparative and quantitative analysis of COVID-19 epidemic interventions in Chinese provinces
A mathematical model was developed to evaluate and compare the effects and intensity of the coronavirus disease 2019 prevention and control measures in Chinese provinces. The time course of the disease with government intervention was described using a dynamic model. The estimated government interve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104305 |
_version_ | 1783691601817632768 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Huan Rong, Zhiwei Qi, Xinye Fu, Jinming Huang, Hao Cao, Lei Shan, Linghan Zhao, Yashuang Li, Kang Hao, Yanhua Jiao, Mingli Wu, Qunhong Zhang, Xue |
author_facet | Liu, Huan Rong, Zhiwei Qi, Xinye Fu, Jinming Huang, Hao Cao, Lei Shan, Linghan Zhao, Yashuang Li, Kang Hao, Yanhua Jiao, Mingli Wu, Qunhong Zhang, Xue |
author_sort | Liu, Huan |
collection | PubMed |
description | A mathematical model was developed to evaluate and compare the effects and intensity of the coronavirus disease 2019 prevention and control measures in Chinese provinces. The time course of the disease with government intervention was described using a dynamic model. The estimated government intervention parameters and area difference between with and without intervention were considered as the intervention intensity and effect, respectively. The model of the disease time course without government intervention predicted that by April 30, 2020, about 3.08% of the population would have been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 in China. Guangdong Province averted the most cases. Comprehensive intervention measures, in which social distancing measures may have played a greater role than isolation measures, resulted in reduced infection cases. Shanghai had the highest intervention intensity. In the context of the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the prevention and control experience of some key areas in China (such as Shanghai and Guangdong) can provide references for outbreak control in many countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8117536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81175362021-05-13 Comparative and quantitative analysis of COVID-19 epidemic interventions in Chinese provinces Liu, Huan Rong, Zhiwei Qi, Xinye Fu, Jinming Huang, Hao Cao, Lei Shan, Linghan Zhao, Yashuang Li, Kang Hao, Yanhua Jiao, Mingli Wu, Qunhong Zhang, Xue Results Phys Article A mathematical model was developed to evaluate and compare the effects and intensity of the coronavirus disease 2019 prevention and control measures in Chinese provinces. The time course of the disease with government intervention was described using a dynamic model. The estimated government intervention parameters and area difference between with and without intervention were considered as the intervention intensity and effect, respectively. The model of the disease time course without government intervention predicted that by April 30, 2020, about 3.08% of the population would have been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 in China. Guangdong Province averted the most cases. Comprehensive intervention measures, in which social distancing measures may have played a greater role than isolation measures, resulted in reduced infection cases. Shanghai had the highest intervention intensity. In the context of the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the prevention and control experience of some key areas in China (such as Shanghai and Guangdong) can provide references for outbreak control in many countries. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021-06 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8117536/ /pubmed/34002128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104305 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Huan Rong, Zhiwei Qi, Xinye Fu, Jinming Huang, Hao Cao, Lei Shan, Linghan Zhao, Yashuang Li, Kang Hao, Yanhua Jiao, Mingli Wu, Qunhong Zhang, Xue Comparative and quantitative analysis of COVID-19 epidemic interventions in Chinese provinces |
title | Comparative and quantitative analysis of COVID-19 epidemic interventions in Chinese provinces |
title_full | Comparative and quantitative analysis of COVID-19 epidemic interventions in Chinese provinces |
title_fullStr | Comparative and quantitative analysis of COVID-19 epidemic interventions in Chinese provinces |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative and quantitative analysis of COVID-19 epidemic interventions in Chinese provinces |
title_short | Comparative and quantitative analysis of COVID-19 epidemic interventions in Chinese provinces |
title_sort | comparative and quantitative analysis of covid-19 epidemic interventions in chinese provinces |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuhuan comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT rongzhiwei comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT qixinye comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT fujinming comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT huanghao comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT caolei comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT shanlinghan comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT zhaoyashuang comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT likang comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT haoyanhua comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT jiaomingli comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT wuqunhong comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces AT zhangxue comparativeandquantitativeanalysisofcovid19epidemicinterventionsinchineseprovinces |