Cargando…

Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (T.B) is one of the major infectious diseases in the developing countries. The diagnosis of extrapulmonary T.B (EPTB) remains problematic and emergence of resistant strains poses a significant threat. Improved diagnosis of tuberculosis is a global priority for proper control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elbrolosy, Asmaa Mohammed, El Helbawy, Rana H., Mansour, Osama M., Latif, Reda Abdel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02210-5
_version_ 1783691621975457792
author Elbrolosy, Asmaa Mohammed
El Helbawy, Rana H.
Mansour, Osama M.
Latif, Reda Abdel
author_facet Elbrolosy, Asmaa Mohammed
El Helbawy, Rana H.
Mansour, Osama M.
Latif, Reda Abdel
author_sort Elbrolosy, Asmaa Mohammed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (T.B) is one of the major infectious diseases in the developing countries. The diagnosis of extrapulmonary T.B (EPTB) remains problematic and emergence of resistant strains poses a significant threat. Improved diagnosis of tuberculosis is a global priority for proper control. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) and EPTB and to evaluate the performance of GeneXpert system for demonstrating rifampicin resistance among the studied patients. METHODS: A total of 582 clinical samples (449 pulmonary; 430 sputum and 19 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and 133 extra-pulmonary origins; 26 pleural fluid, 62 CSF, 19 ascetic fluid, 12 pus and 14 urine) were collected from patients under clinical and radiological assessment of either PTB or EPTB who were admitted to Menoufia Chest Hospital over a period of three years. Clinical samples were processed and investigated for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) by both Xpert assay and the conventional methods including Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN)/acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear microscopy and Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture. Patients′ demographic, clinical characteristics and risk factors for acquiring rifampicin resistance were analyzed. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, false- negative rate and total accuracy of AFB smear microscopy respectively were 72.1 %, 81.3 %, 27.9 and 78.8 % for PTB. However for EPTB, they were 63.2 %, 70.5 %, 36.8 and 68.4 % respectively in relation to LJ culture as the gold standard. GeneXpert MTB/RIF revealed better performance for PTB than EPTB. For PTB, it showed 90.2 % sensitivity, 86.9 % specificity, and 9.8 % false- negative rate. For EPTB, the assay showed a sensitivity of 81.6 %, specificity of 78.9 % and false- negative rate of 18.5 %. Multivariate regression analysis showed that presence of EPTB and contacts with known TB cases were independent risk factors for developing rifampicin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay is a rapid and highly sensitive technique for diagnosis of PTB or EPTB. Its simplicity and accuracy make this new method a very impressive tool for diagnosis of MTB and rifampicin resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8117635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81176352021-05-17 Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis Elbrolosy, Asmaa Mohammed El Helbawy, Rana H. Mansour, Osama M. Latif, Reda Abdel BMC Microbiol Research BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (T.B) is one of the major infectious diseases in the developing countries. The diagnosis of extrapulmonary T.B (EPTB) remains problematic and emergence of resistant strains poses a significant threat. Improved diagnosis of tuberculosis is a global priority for proper control. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) and EPTB and to evaluate the performance of GeneXpert system for demonstrating rifampicin resistance among the studied patients. METHODS: A total of 582 clinical samples (449 pulmonary; 430 sputum and 19 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and 133 extra-pulmonary origins; 26 pleural fluid, 62 CSF, 19 ascetic fluid, 12 pus and 14 urine) were collected from patients under clinical and radiological assessment of either PTB or EPTB who were admitted to Menoufia Chest Hospital over a period of three years. Clinical samples were processed and investigated for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) by both Xpert assay and the conventional methods including Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN)/acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear microscopy and Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture. Patients′ demographic, clinical characteristics and risk factors for acquiring rifampicin resistance were analyzed. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, false- negative rate and total accuracy of AFB smear microscopy respectively were 72.1 %, 81.3 %, 27.9 and 78.8 % for PTB. However for EPTB, they were 63.2 %, 70.5 %, 36.8 and 68.4 % respectively in relation to LJ culture as the gold standard. GeneXpert MTB/RIF revealed better performance for PTB than EPTB. For PTB, it showed 90.2 % sensitivity, 86.9 % specificity, and 9.8 % false- negative rate. For EPTB, the assay showed a sensitivity of 81.6 %, specificity of 78.9 % and false- negative rate of 18.5 %. Multivariate regression analysis showed that presence of EPTB and contacts with known TB cases were independent risk factors for developing rifampicin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay is a rapid and highly sensitive technique for diagnosis of PTB or EPTB. Its simplicity and accuracy make this new method a very impressive tool for diagnosis of MTB and rifampicin resistance. BioMed Central 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8117635/ /pubmed/33980173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02210-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Elbrolosy, Asmaa Mohammed
El Helbawy, Rana H.
Mansour, Osama M.
Latif, Reda Abdel
Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis
title Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis
title_full Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis
title_fullStr Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis
title_short Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis
title_sort diagnostic utility of genexpert mtb/rif assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02210-5
work_keys_str_mv AT elbrolosyasmaamohammed diagnosticutilityofgenexpertmtbrifassayversusconventionalmethodsfordiagnosisofpulmonaryandextrapulmonarytuberculosis
AT elhelbawyranah diagnosticutilityofgenexpertmtbrifassayversusconventionalmethodsfordiagnosisofpulmonaryandextrapulmonarytuberculosis
AT mansourosamam diagnosticutilityofgenexpertmtbrifassayversusconventionalmethodsfordiagnosisofpulmonaryandextrapulmonarytuberculosis
AT latifredaabdel diagnosticutilityofgenexpertmtbrifassayversusconventionalmethodsfordiagnosisofpulmonaryandextrapulmonarytuberculosis