Cargando…
Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation
OBJECTIVES: The value of healthcare data is being increasingly recognised, including the need to improve health dataset utility. There is no established mechanism for evaluating healthcare dataset utility making it difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of activities improving the data. To describe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100303 |
_version_ | 1783691672201199616 |
---|---|
author | Gordon, Ben Barrett, Jake Fennessy, Clara Cake, Caroline Milward, Adam Irwin, Courtney Jones, Monica Sebire, Neil |
author_facet | Gordon, Ben Barrett, Jake Fennessy, Clara Cake, Caroline Milward, Adam Irwin, Courtney Jones, Monica Sebire, Neil |
author_sort | Gordon, Ben |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The value of healthcare data is being increasingly recognised, including the need to improve health dataset utility. There is no established mechanism for evaluating healthcare dataset utility making it difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of activities improving the data. To describe the method for generating and involving the user community in developing a proposed framework for evaluation and communication of healthcare dataset utility for given research areas. METHODS: An initial version of a matrix to review datasets across a range of dimensions was developed based on previous published findings regarding healthcare data. This was used to initiate a design process through interviews and surveys with data users representing a broad range of user types and use cases, to help develop a focused framework for characterising datasets. RESULTS: Following 21 interviews, 31 survey responses and testing on 43 datasets, five major categories and 13 subcategories were identified as useful for a dataset, including Data Model, Completeness and Linkage. Each sub-category was graded to facilitate rapid and reproducible evaluation of dataset utility for specific use-cases. Testing of applicability to >40 existing datasets demonstrated potential usefulness for subsequent evaluation in real-world practice. DISCUSSION: The research has developed an evidenced-based initial approach for a framework to understand the utility of a healthcare dataset. It is likely to require further refinement following wider application and additional categories may be required. CONCLUSION: The process has resulted in a user-centred designed framework for objectively evaluating the likely utility of specific healthcare datasets, and therefore, should be of value both for potential users of health data, and for data custodians to identify the areas to provide the optimal value for data curation investment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8117992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81179922021-05-26 Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation Gordon, Ben Barrett, Jake Fennessy, Clara Cake, Caroline Milward, Adam Irwin, Courtney Jones, Monica Sebire, Neil BMJ Health Care Inform Original Research OBJECTIVES: The value of healthcare data is being increasingly recognised, including the need to improve health dataset utility. There is no established mechanism for evaluating healthcare dataset utility making it difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of activities improving the data. To describe the method for generating and involving the user community in developing a proposed framework for evaluation and communication of healthcare dataset utility for given research areas. METHODS: An initial version of a matrix to review datasets across a range of dimensions was developed based on previous published findings regarding healthcare data. This was used to initiate a design process through interviews and surveys with data users representing a broad range of user types and use cases, to help develop a focused framework for characterising datasets. RESULTS: Following 21 interviews, 31 survey responses and testing on 43 datasets, five major categories and 13 subcategories were identified as useful for a dataset, including Data Model, Completeness and Linkage. Each sub-category was graded to facilitate rapid and reproducible evaluation of dataset utility for specific use-cases. Testing of applicability to >40 existing datasets demonstrated potential usefulness for subsequent evaluation in real-world practice. DISCUSSION: The research has developed an evidenced-based initial approach for a framework to understand the utility of a healthcare dataset. It is likely to require further refinement following wider application and additional categories may be required. CONCLUSION: The process has resulted in a user-centred designed framework for objectively evaluating the likely utility of specific healthcare datasets, and therefore, should be of value both for potential users of health data, and for data custodians to identify the areas to provide the optimal value for data curation investment. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8117992/ /pubmed/33980500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100303 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gordon, Ben Barrett, Jake Fennessy, Clara Cake, Caroline Milward, Adam Irwin, Courtney Jones, Monica Sebire, Neil Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation |
title | Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation |
title_full | Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation |
title_fullStr | Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation |
title_short | Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation |
title_sort | development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33980500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gordonben developmentofadatautilityframeworktosupporteffectivehealthdatacuration AT barrettjake developmentofadatautilityframeworktosupporteffectivehealthdatacuration AT fennessyclara developmentofadatautilityframeworktosupporteffectivehealthdatacuration AT cakecaroline developmentofadatautilityframeworktosupporteffectivehealthdatacuration AT milwardadam developmentofadatautilityframeworktosupporteffectivehealthdatacuration AT irwincourtney developmentofadatautilityframeworktosupporteffectivehealthdatacuration AT jonesmonica developmentofadatautilityframeworktosupporteffectivehealthdatacuration AT sebireneil developmentofadatautilityframeworktosupporteffectivehealthdatacuration |