Cargando…

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects

BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease is one of the major causes of alveolar bone loss. There are various ways of regenerating the lost bone, i.e. guided tissue regeneration, bone grafts, and growth factors. In this purview, it becomes immensely important for a clinician to decide the best modality of tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaid, Tithi, Kumar, Santosh, Mehta, Rupal, Shah, Sujay, Joshi, Surabhi, Bhakkand, Susmita, Hirani, Tanvi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013194
http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1718
_version_ 1783691703938449408
author Vaid, Tithi
Kumar, Santosh
Mehta, Rupal
Shah, Sujay
Joshi, Surabhi
Bhakkand, Susmita
Hirani, Tanvi
author_facet Vaid, Tithi
Kumar, Santosh
Mehta, Rupal
Shah, Sujay
Joshi, Surabhi
Bhakkand, Susmita
Hirani, Tanvi
author_sort Vaid, Tithi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease is one of the major causes of alveolar bone loss. There are various ways of regenerating the lost bone, i.e. guided tissue regeneration, bone grafts, and growth factors. In this purview, it becomes immensely important for a clinician to decide the best modality of treatment. In this study, we compared the effect of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in combination with concentrated growth factors (CGF) verses CGF alone. METHODS: This double-blind, split-mouth study was conducted on ten patients with two comparable bilateral intrabony defects. Each pair of defects was randomly treated by DFDBA + CGF or CGF alone. Clinical parameters such as plaque index (PI), modified gingival index (MGI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment level (RAL) were recorded at baseline, three months, and six months. In addition, radiograph with grids was also taken at baseline and six months. The paired t-test was used to compare the pre- and post-treatment values and the unpaired t-test was used to compare the test and control group. RESULTS: The PI score decreased significantly from baseline to six months. Similarly, the mean MGI score decreased significantly from baseline to six months. The intragroup comparison showed that there was a significant reduction in PPD in both the test and control group. However, the intergroup comparison showed that the reduced pocket depth was not significant. The intragroup radiographic comparison showed that there was the significant formation of bone in both the test and control group but inter-group showed that the formation of bone among both the group were non-significant. CONCLUSION: Radiographic and clinical outcomes of this study concluded that post six months, both groups demonstrated significant improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters. However, the addition of DFDBA to CGFs did not give any additional benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8118214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81182142021-05-18 Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects Vaid, Tithi Kumar, Santosh Mehta, Rupal Shah, Sujay Joshi, Surabhi Bhakkand, Susmita Hirani, Tanvi Med Pharm Rep Original Research: Dental Medicine BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease is one of the major causes of alveolar bone loss. There are various ways of regenerating the lost bone, i.e. guided tissue regeneration, bone grafts, and growth factors. In this purview, it becomes immensely important for a clinician to decide the best modality of treatment. In this study, we compared the effect of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in combination with concentrated growth factors (CGF) verses CGF alone. METHODS: This double-blind, split-mouth study was conducted on ten patients with two comparable bilateral intrabony defects. Each pair of defects was randomly treated by DFDBA + CGF or CGF alone. Clinical parameters such as plaque index (PI), modified gingival index (MGI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment level (RAL) were recorded at baseline, three months, and six months. In addition, radiograph with grids was also taken at baseline and six months. The paired t-test was used to compare the pre- and post-treatment values and the unpaired t-test was used to compare the test and control group. RESULTS: The PI score decreased significantly from baseline to six months. Similarly, the mean MGI score decreased significantly from baseline to six months. The intragroup comparison showed that there was a significant reduction in PPD in both the test and control group. However, the intergroup comparison showed that the reduced pocket depth was not significant. The intragroup radiographic comparison showed that there was the significant formation of bone in both the test and control group but inter-group showed that the formation of bone among both the group were non-significant. CONCLUSION: Radiographic and clinical outcomes of this study concluded that post six months, both groups demonstrated significant improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters. However, the addition of DFDBA to CGFs did not give any additional benefits. Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy 2021-04 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8118214/ /pubmed/34013194 http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1718 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research: Dental Medicine
Vaid, Tithi
Kumar, Santosh
Mehta, Rupal
Shah, Sujay
Joshi, Surabhi
Bhakkand, Susmita
Hirani, Tanvi
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects
title Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects
title_full Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects
title_fullStr Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects
title_short Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects
title_sort clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects
topic Original Research: Dental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013194
http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1718
work_keys_str_mv AT vaidtithi clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects
AT kumarsantosh clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects
AT mehtarupal clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects
AT shahsujay clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects
AT joshisurabhi clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects
AT bhakkandsusmita clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects
AT hiranitanvi clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects