Cargando…
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects
BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease is one of the major causes of alveolar bone loss. There are various ways of regenerating the lost bone, i.e. guided tissue regeneration, bone grafts, and growth factors. In this purview, it becomes immensely important for a clinician to decide the best modality of tre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013194 http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1718 |
_version_ | 1783691703938449408 |
---|---|
author | Vaid, Tithi Kumar, Santosh Mehta, Rupal Shah, Sujay Joshi, Surabhi Bhakkand, Susmita Hirani, Tanvi |
author_facet | Vaid, Tithi Kumar, Santosh Mehta, Rupal Shah, Sujay Joshi, Surabhi Bhakkand, Susmita Hirani, Tanvi |
author_sort | Vaid, Tithi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease is one of the major causes of alveolar bone loss. There are various ways of regenerating the lost bone, i.e. guided tissue regeneration, bone grafts, and growth factors. In this purview, it becomes immensely important for a clinician to decide the best modality of treatment. In this study, we compared the effect of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in combination with concentrated growth factors (CGF) verses CGF alone. METHODS: This double-blind, split-mouth study was conducted on ten patients with two comparable bilateral intrabony defects. Each pair of defects was randomly treated by DFDBA + CGF or CGF alone. Clinical parameters such as plaque index (PI), modified gingival index (MGI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment level (RAL) were recorded at baseline, three months, and six months. In addition, radiograph with grids was also taken at baseline and six months. The paired t-test was used to compare the pre- and post-treatment values and the unpaired t-test was used to compare the test and control group. RESULTS: The PI score decreased significantly from baseline to six months. Similarly, the mean MGI score decreased significantly from baseline to six months. The intragroup comparison showed that there was a significant reduction in PPD in both the test and control group. However, the intergroup comparison showed that the reduced pocket depth was not significant. The intragroup radiographic comparison showed that there was the significant formation of bone in both the test and control group but inter-group showed that the formation of bone among both the group were non-significant. CONCLUSION: Radiographic and clinical outcomes of this study concluded that post six months, both groups demonstrated significant improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters. However, the addition of DFDBA to CGFs did not give any additional benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8118214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81182142021-05-18 Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects Vaid, Tithi Kumar, Santosh Mehta, Rupal Shah, Sujay Joshi, Surabhi Bhakkand, Susmita Hirani, Tanvi Med Pharm Rep Original Research: Dental Medicine BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease is one of the major causes of alveolar bone loss. There are various ways of regenerating the lost bone, i.e. guided tissue regeneration, bone grafts, and growth factors. In this purview, it becomes immensely important for a clinician to decide the best modality of treatment. In this study, we compared the effect of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in combination with concentrated growth factors (CGF) verses CGF alone. METHODS: This double-blind, split-mouth study was conducted on ten patients with two comparable bilateral intrabony defects. Each pair of defects was randomly treated by DFDBA + CGF or CGF alone. Clinical parameters such as plaque index (PI), modified gingival index (MGI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment level (RAL) were recorded at baseline, three months, and six months. In addition, radiograph with grids was also taken at baseline and six months. The paired t-test was used to compare the pre- and post-treatment values and the unpaired t-test was used to compare the test and control group. RESULTS: The PI score decreased significantly from baseline to six months. Similarly, the mean MGI score decreased significantly from baseline to six months. The intragroup comparison showed that there was a significant reduction in PPD in both the test and control group. However, the intergroup comparison showed that the reduced pocket depth was not significant. The intragroup radiographic comparison showed that there was the significant formation of bone in both the test and control group but inter-group showed that the formation of bone among both the group were non-significant. CONCLUSION: Radiographic and clinical outcomes of this study concluded that post six months, both groups demonstrated significant improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters. However, the addition of DFDBA to CGFs did not give any additional benefits. Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy 2021-04 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8118214/ /pubmed/34013194 http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1718 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Research: Dental Medicine Vaid, Tithi Kumar, Santosh Mehta, Rupal Shah, Sujay Joshi, Surabhi Bhakkand, Susmita Hirani, Tanvi Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects |
title | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects |
title_full | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects |
title_fullStr | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects |
title_short | Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects |
title_sort | clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects |
topic | Original Research: Dental Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34013194 http://dx.doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1718 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaidtithi clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects AT kumarsantosh clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects AT mehtarupal clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects AT shahsujay clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects AT joshisurabhi clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects AT bhakkandsusmita clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects AT hiranitanvi clinicalandradiographicevaluationofdemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftwithconcentratedgrowthfactorversusconcentratedgrowthfactoraloneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefects |