Cargando…

Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review

The authors conducted a scoping review to investigate the structure, content, and potential impact of post-residency medical education fellowships. The authors searched eight databases to identify English-language articles describing longitudinal, post-residency medical fellowships that both focused...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cataldi, Mariel L., Kelly-Hedrick, Margot, Nanavati, Julie, Chisolm, Margaret S., Anne L., Walsh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920084
_version_ 1783691750524583936
author Cataldi, Mariel L.
Kelly-Hedrick, Margot
Nanavati, Julie
Chisolm, Margaret S.
Anne L., Walsh
author_facet Cataldi, Mariel L.
Kelly-Hedrick, Margot
Nanavati, Julie
Chisolm, Margaret S.
Anne L., Walsh
author_sort Cataldi, Mariel L.
collection PubMed
description The authors conducted a scoping review to investigate the structure, content, and potential impact of post-residency medical education fellowships. The authors searched eight databases to identify English-language articles describing longitudinal, post-residency medical fellowships that both focused on medical education and described the structure and content of the curriculum. The authors summarized the findings of each article and, for those articles that included a program evaluation, assessed the potential impact of the program via the Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Training Evaluation Model and the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Nine articles, describing a total of ten post-residency medical education fellowships, met inclusion criteria. Half of the programs were dedicated medical education fellowships and half were medical education tracks within a subspecialty fellowship. The content and educational strategies varied, with no two programs having the same curriculum. Most programs most focused on teaching skills, adult learning theory, curricular development, and medical education research/scholarship. Most programs used project-based learning, workshops, and faculty mentorship as educational strategies. Six of the articles included an evaluation of their program(s), all of which suggested positive changes, at least at the level of fellow behavior (Kirkpatrick level 3), and designs limited the strength of any conclusions drawn. This scoping review highlights the variation among medical education fellowships and the need for common curricular components, as well as program evaluation, across and within these fellowships. Additional assessment at higher levels of trainee outcomes will help guide the creation and revision of medical education fellowships, and inform the development of a core curriculum shared across programs. Such a core curriculum could then serve as the foundation for a certification program, by which a medical educator’s expertise could be recognized, thus elevating medical education to the stature it deserves within the academic mission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8118440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81184402021-06-07 Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review Cataldi, Mariel L. Kelly-Hedrick, Margot Nanavati, Julie Chisolm, Margaret S. Anne L., Walsh Med Educ Online Review Article The authors conducted a scoping review to investigate the structure, content, and potential impact of post-residency medical education fellowships. The authors searched eight databases to identify English-language articles describing longitudinal, post-residency medical fellowships that both focused on medical education and described the structure and content of the curriculum. The authors summarized the findings of each article and, for those articles that included a program evaluation, assessed the potential impact of the program via the Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Training Evaluation Model and the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Nine articles, describing a total of ten post-residency medical education fellowships, met inclusion criteria. Half of the programs were dedicated medical education fellowships and half were medical education tracks within a subspecialty fellowship. The content and educational strategies varied, with no two programs having the same curriculum. Most programs most focused on teaching skills, adult learning theory, curricular development, and medical education research/scholarship. Most programs used project-based learning, workshops, and faculty mentorship as educational strategies. Six of the articles included an evaluation of their program(s), all of which suggested positive changes, at least at the level of fellow behavior (Kirkpatrick level 3), and designs limited the strength of any conclusions drawn. This scoping review highlights the variation among medical education fellowships and the need for common curricular components, as well as program evaluation, across and within these fellowships. Additional assessment at higher levels of trainee outcomes will help guide the creation and revision of medical education fellowships, and inform the development of a core curriculum shared across programs. Such a core curriculum could then serve as the foundation for a certification program, by which a medical educator’s expertise could be recognized, thus elevating medical education to the stature it deserves within the academic mission. Taylor & Francis 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8118440/ /pubmed/33970808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920084 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cataldi, Mariel L.
Kelly-Hedrick, Margot
Nanavati, Julie
Chisolm, Margaret S.
Anne L., Walsh
Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review
title Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review
title_full Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review
title_fullStr Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review
title_short Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review
title_sort post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920084
work_keys_str_mv AT cataldimariell postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview
AT kellyhedrickmargot postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview
AT nanavatijulie postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview
AT chisolmmargarets postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview
AT annelwalsh postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview