Cargando…
Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review
The authors conducted a scoping review to investigate the structure, content, and potential impact of post-residency medical education fellowships. The authors searched eight databases to identify English-language articles describing longitudinal, post-residency medical fellowships that both focused...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920084 |
_version_ | 1783691750524583936 |
---|---|
author | Cataldi, Mariel L. Kelly-Hedrick, Margot Nanavati, Julie Chisolm, Margaret S. Anne L., Walsh |
author_facet | Cataldi, Mariel L. Kelly-Hedrick, Margot Nanavati, Julie Chisolm, Margaret S. Anne L., Walsh |
author_sort | Cataldi, Mariel L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The authors conducted a scoping review to investigate the structure, content, and potential impact of post-residency medical education fellowships. The authors searched eight databases to identify English-language articles describing longitudinal, post-residency medical fellowships that both focused on medical education and described the structure and content of the curriculum. The authors summarized the findings of each article and, for those articles that included a program evaluation, assessed the potential impact of the program via the Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Training Evaluation Model and the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Nine articles, describing a total of ten post-residency medical education fellowships, met inclusion criteria. Half of the programs were dedicated medical education fellowships and half were medical education tracks within a subspecialty fellowship. The content and educational strategies varied, with no two programs having the same curriculum. Most programs most focused on teaching skills, adult learning theory, curricular development, and medical education research/scholarship. Most programs used project-based learning, workshops, and faculty mentorship as educational strategies. Six of the articles included an evaluation of their program(s), all of which suggested positive changes, at least at the level of fellow behavior (Kirkpatrick level 3), and designs limited the strength of any conclusions drawn. This scoping review highlights the variation among medical education fellowships and the need for common curricular components, as well as program evaluation, across and within these fellowships. Additional assessment at higher levels of trainee outcomes will help guide the creation and revision of medical education fellowships, and inform the development of a core curriculum shared across programs. Such a core curriculum could then serve as the foundation for a certification program, by which a medical educator’s expertise could be recognized, thus elevating medical education to the stature it deserves within the academic mission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8118440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81184402021-06-07 Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review Cataldi, Mariel L. Kelly-Hedrick, Margot Nanavati, Julie Chisolm, Margaret S. Anne L., Walsh Med Educ Online Review Article The authors conducted a scoping review to investigate the structure, content, and potential impact of post-residency medical education fellowships. The authors searched eight databases to identify English-language articles describing longitudinal, post-residency medical fellowships that both focused on medical education and described the structure and content of the curriculum. The authors summarized the findings of each article and, for those articles that included a program evaluation, assessed the potential impact of the program via the Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Training Evaluation Model and the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Nine articles, describing a total of ten post-residency medical education fellowships, met inclusion criteria. Half of the programs were dedicated medical education fellowships and half were medical education tracks within a subspecialty fellowship. The content and educational strategies varied, with no two programs having the same curriculum. Most programs most focused on teaching skills, adult learning theory, curricular development, and medical education research/scholarship. Most programs used project-based learning, workshops, and faculty mentorship as educational strategies. Six of the articles included an evaluation of their program(s), all of which suggested positive changes, at least at the level of fellow behavior (Kirkpatrick level 3), and designs limited the strength of any conclusions drawn. This scoping review highlights the variation among medical education fellowships and the need for common curricular components, as well as program evaluation, across and within these fellowships. Additional assessment at higher levels of trainee outcomes will help guide the creation and revision of medical education fellowships, and inform the development of a core curriculum shared across programs. Such a core curriculum could then serve as the foundation for a certification program, by which a medical educator’s expertise could be recognized, thus elevating medical education to the stature it deserves within the academic mission. Taylor & Francis 2021-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8118440/ /pubmed/33970808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920084 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Cataldi, Mariel L. Kelly-Hedrick, Margot Nanavati, Julie Chisolm, Margaret S. Anne L., Walsh Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review |
title | Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review |
title_full | Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review |
title_short | Post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review |
title_sort | post-residency medical education fellowships: a scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8118440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33970808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cataldimariell postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview AT kellyhedrickmargot postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview AT nanavatijulie postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview AT chisolmmargarets postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview AT annelwalsh postresidencymedicaleducationfellowshipsascopingreview |