Cargando…

Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of collagen-sensitive maps derived from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of lumbar disk pathologies in a feasibility setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schömig, Friederike, Pumberger, Matthias, Palmowski, Yannick, Ditges, Ann-Kathrin, Diekhoff, Torsten, Göhler, Friedemann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8119261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03685-5
_version_ 1783691836354723840
author Schömig, Friederike
Pumberger, Matthias
Palmowski, Yannick
Ditges, Ann-Kathrin
Diekhoff, Torsten
Göhler, Friedemann
author_facet Schömig, Friederike
Pumberger, Matthias
Palmowski, Yannick
Ditges, Ann-Kathrin
Diekhoff, Torsten
Göhler, Friedemann
author_sort Schömig, Friederike
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of collagen-sensitive maps derived from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of lumbar disk pathologies in a feasibility setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and DECT datasets acquired in patients who underwent periradicular therapy of the lumbar spine from June to December 2019. Three readers scored DECT collagen maps, conventional CT, and MRI for presence, type, and extent of disk pathology. Contingency table analyses were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy using MRI as standard of reference. Interrater agreement within and between imaging modalities was evaluated by computing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Cohen’s kappa. Correlation between sum scores of anteroposterior disk displacement was determined by calculation of a paired t test. RESULTS: In 21 disks in 13 patients, DECT had a sensitivity of 0.87 (0.60–0.98) and specificity of 1.00 (0.54–1.00) for the detection of disk pathology. Intermodality agreement for anteroposterior disk displacement was excellent for DECT (ICC 0.963 [0.909–0.985]) and superior to CT (ICC 0.876 [0.691–0.95]). For anteroposterior disk displacement, DECT also showed greater within-modality interrater agreement (ICC 0.820 [0.666–0.916]) compared with CT (ICC 0.624 [0.39–0.808]). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that collagen-sensitive imaging has an added benefit, allowing more accurate evaluation of the extent of disk displacement with higher interrater reliability. Thus, DECT could provide useful diagnostic information in patients undergoing CT for other indications or with contraindications to MRI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00256-020-03685-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8119261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81192612021-05-26 Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography Schömig, Friederike Pumberger, Matthias Palmowski, Yannick Ditges, Ann-Kathrin Diekhoff, Torsten Göhler, Friedemann Skeletal Radiol Scientific Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of collagen-sensitive maps derived from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of lumbar disk pathologies in a feasibility setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and DECT datasets acquired in patients who underwent periradicular therapy of the lumbar spine from June to December 2019. Three readers scored DECT collagen maps, conventional CT, and MRI for presence, type, and extent of disk pathology. Contingency table analyses were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy using MRI as standard of reference. Interrater agreement within and between imaging modalities was evaluated by computing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Cohen’s kappa. Correlation between sum scores of anteroposterior disk displacement was determined by calculation of a paired t test. RESULTS: In 21 disks in 13 patients, DECT had a sensitivity of 0.87 (0.60–0.98) and specificity of 1.00 (0.54–1.00) for the detection of disk pathology. Intermodality agreement for anteroposterior disk displacement was excellent for DECT (ICC 0.963 [0.909–0.985]) and superior to CT (ICC 0.876 [0.691–0.95]). For anteroposterior disk displacement, DECT also showed greater within-modality interrater agreement (ICC 0.820 [0.666–0.916]) compared with CT (ICC 0.624 [0.39–0.808]). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that collagen-sensitive imaging has an added benefit, allowing more accurate evaluation of the extent of disk displacement with higher interrater reliability. Thus, DECT could provide useful diagnostic information in patients undergoing CT for other indications or with contraindications to MRI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00256-020-03685-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8119261/ /pubmed/33277674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03685-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Schömig, Friederike
Pumberger, Matthias
Palmowski, Yannick
Ditges, Ann-Kathrin
Diekhoff, Torsten
Göhler, Friedemann
Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography
title Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography
title_full Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography
title_fullStr Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography
title_short Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography
title_sort vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8119261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03685-5
work_keys_str_mv AT schomigfriederike vertebraldiskmorphologyofthelumbarspinearetrospectiveanalysisofcollagensensitivemappingusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT pumbergermatthias vertebraldiskmorphologyofthelumbarspinearetrospectiveanalysisofcollagensensitivemappingusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT palmowskiyannick vertebraldiskmorphologyofthelumbarspinearetrospectiveanalysisofcollagensensitivemappingusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT ditgesannkathrin vertebraldiskmorphologyofthelumbarspinearetrospectiveanalysisofcollagensensitivemappingusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT diekhofftorsten vertebraldiskmorphologyofthelumbarspinearetrospectiveanalysisofcollagensensitivemappingusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT gohlerfriedemann vertebraldiskmorphologyofthelumbarspinearetrospectiveanalysisofcollagensensitivemappingusingdualenergycomputedtomography