Cargando…

Was King Ludwig II of Bavaria misdiagnosed by Gudden and his colleagues?

In 1886, Bernhard von Gudden and three other expert psychiatrists diagnosed the Bavarian King Ludwig II with “paranoia (madness),” a diagnosis that the Bavarian government used to justify removing Ludwig from power. Although Ludwig was not evaluated in detail by the psychiatrists, in their opinion,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinberg, Reinhard, Falkai, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8119274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-020-01161-8
_version_ 1783691839202656256
author Steinberg, Reinhard
Falkai, Peter
author_facet Steinberg, Reinhard
Falkai, Peter
author_sort Steinberg, Reinhard
collection PubMed
description In 1886, Bernhard von Gudden and three other expert psychiatrists diagnosed the Bavarian King Ludwig II with “paranoia (madness),” a diagnosis that the Bavarian government used to justify removing Ludwig from power. Although Ludwig was not evaluated in detail by the psychiatrists, in their opinion, sworn eyewitness accounts and general knowledge about Ludwig’s behavior provided sufficient grounds for the diagnosis. Ludwig was a great admirer of the musician, Richard Wagner, and shared some of his ideas of an idealistic society. At first, he identified with Wagner’s opera heroes, and he became Wagner’s patron sponsor for life. However, he grew increasingly interested in an absolutist state, envisioning himself as a monarch with a role similar to that of Louis XIV. His multiple building projects, for which he incurred much debt, his conviction that he was descended from the Bourbons through baptism, his increasingly abnormal behavior, and his hallucinations together formed the basis for the psychiatrists’ diagnosis. Although not mentioned in the expert opinion, Ludwig’s homophilic behavior—a scandal at the time—was probably also an important reason for his removal from office. A review of the psychiatric knowledge and societal philosophy of the time indicates that the psychiatrists were correct with their diagnosis in their time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8119274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81192742021-05-26 Was King Ludwig II of Bavaria misdiagnosed by Gudden and his colleagues? Steinberg, Reinhard Falkai, Peter Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Original Paper In 1886, Bernhard von Gudden and three other expert psychiatrists diagnosed the Bavarian King Ludwig II with “paranoia (madness),” a diagnosis that the Bavarian government used to justify removing Ludwig from power. Although Ludwig was not evaluated in detail by the psychiatrists, in their opinion, sworn eyewitness accounts and general knowledge about Ludwig’s behavior provided sufficient grounds for the diagnosis. Ludwig was a great admirer of the musician, Richard Wagner, and shared some of his ideas of an idealistic society. At first, he identified with Wagner’s opera heroes, and he became Wagner’s patron sponsor for life. However, he grew increasingly interested in an absolutist state, envisioning himself as a monarch with a role similar to that of Louis XIV. His multiple building projects, for which he incurred much debt, his conviction that he was descended from the Bourbons through baptism, his increasingly abnormal behavior, and his hallucinations together formed the basis for the psychiatrists’ diagnosis. Although not mentioned in the expert opinion, Ludwig’s homophilic behavior—a scandal at the time—was probably also an important reason for his removal from office. A review of the psychiatric knowledge and societal philosophy of the time indicates that the psychiatrists were correct with their diagnosis in their time. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8119274/ /pubmed/32696275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-020-01161-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Steinberg, Reinhard
Falkai, Peter
Was King Ludwig II of Bavaria misdiagnosed by Gudden and his colleagues?
title Was King Ludwig II of Bavaria misdiagnosed by Gudden and his colleagues?
title_full Was King Ludwig II of Bavaria misdiagnosed by Gudden and his colleagues?
title_fullStr Was King Ludwig II of Bavaria misdiagnosed by Gudden and his colleagues?
title_full_unstemmed Was King Ludwig II of Bavaria misdiagnosed by Gudden and his colleagues?
title_short Was King Ludwig II of Bavaria misdiagnosed by Gudden and his colleagues?
title_sort was king ludwig ii of bavaria misdiagnosed by gudden and his colleagues?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8119274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32696275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-020-01161-8
work_keys_str_mv AT steinbergreinhard waskingludwigiiofbavariamisdiagnosedbyguddenandhiscolleagues
AT falkaipeter waskingludwigiiofbavariamisdiagnosedbyguddenandhiscolleagues